I have decided that manginas are worse than Feminists. I used to believe the opposite but a recent comment on feministing has turned me towards believing that manginas are actually even more obnoxious.
Okay, here's the deal: Feministing had a post complaining about this company that was offering a set of "brands" for meat products reading "Dad" and "Son". The idea is that I guess if a father and son are cooking out that they can use the branding irons to mark which piece of steak is theirs.
Now, granted, this is an incredibly stupid idea for a product but that wasn't Feministing's problem with it. No, they found it sexist because it implied that eating meat was manly and by not having an identical mother/daughter pair of brands the makers of the product were saying that women didn't really like steak and generally preferred vegetables.
But anyway, the real problem was in the comments section where this one mangina who never shuts up about his now 2 year old daughter said something like this, "I can imagine my daughter coming home from Brazillian Ju Jitsu practice when she is 13, wiping her sweat off with her Gi and saying, 'Give me the piece that's still bleeding'"
Here are the issues I have with his statement:
1. The phrase is "still breathing" you fucking dumbass. Not "still bleeding". You say you want your meat still breathing to indicate that it is so rare, you haven't even cooked it yet. What the hell could "still bleeding" possibly mean? Frickin' idiot. Only a total pussy mangina could make a mistake like that.
2. I don't give a shit how much BJJ your whore daughter takes, my skinny, couch potato ass will still be able to kick the living shit out of her and 99.9% of all women with one hand tied behind my back. This guy clearly wants his daughter to take BJJ so she can hold her own physically with guys but that will never happen. It's bad enough we have to put up with women claiming that they are our mental equals, but now we have people claiming that they are our physical equals too.
I read a lot of Feminist writing and they all uniformilly suck, but manginas like this one piss me off the most. And also, when you think about it, Feminists by themselves have never done any actual damage. It has all been done by their mangina allies.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Insecurity of cunts
Feministing had all their bitches post about things that they hated. It revealed that Feminists are more insecure than I realized. Let's go over some and see how they are all stupid cunts.
This is from Samhita's list:
9. Shops that don't carry larger than a size 8.
Why should a private business cater to your fat ass you stupid cunt?
8. Body hair removal.
What the fuck do you care if people get their body hair removed you dumb harlot?
5. Progressive men that do sexist shit.
You mean that you don't like it when liberal guys kiss your ugly ass insufficiently? Fuck you bitch.
4. The McCain/Palin ticket.
At least you mentioned McCain. You are a cunt.
3. Having my weight scrutinized by friends and family on a regular basis even though I am a grown ass woman and it is none of your business.
Maybe if you weren't such a fat ass they wouldn't worry about it so much
1. Dating.
I don't like dating either, which is why I DON'T FUCKING DO IT. Stop being a whiny cunt.
That's a wrap for Samhita, lets go on to the dumbass comentators.
Yes!!!
I hate family commenting on my weight in the guise of "are you eating healthy at school? are you going to take a dance class?" aka "you look fat" and i get the same crap from my doctor, "you're healthy, but..."
Posted by Molly September 24, 2008 11:40 AM
Molly, it sounds like you are a fat ho.
About the weight issue--I hate it when I complain about my weight and my S.O. says "well I think you look beautiful." I understand he is trying to be sweet, but who the f cares what he thinks? It's not about what he thinks of me...it's how I feel about myself. When will men realize it's NOT ALWAYS ABOUT THEM!?
Posted by Bee September 24, 2008 2:24 PM
Holy shit.
A smug asshole telling me, "don't you get it? you will ALWAYS be judged by the way you look".
Posted by Chartreus September 24, 2008 9:51 PM
That guy is the man.
5. The once a month weigh in over the phone. Mom or Dad: "How's your health? Have you put on any weight?" Me: "I'm 5 feet 2 inches and I weigh about 125 pounds, which is average! Why do you keep asking?" Mom or Dad: "Hmmm, be careful. Eat properly" Eh?!
125 at 5'2 is not average you fat ho bag.
10. Two words: "women's issues"
Posted by Courtney - September 18, 2008, at 04:35PM in Sexism
You may just be the biggest crybaby whore to ever live. Feminists are the ones who created "women's issues". You are a total cunt.
.4. Feeling ugly without makeup.
You are probably just as ugly with it.
7. Feeling too intimidated to confront certain people on their oppressive attitudes or actions
Haha, not so tough when you aren't online are you? Dumb bitch.
10. People who take non-stranger rapes less seriously.
Posted by MHeald September 18, 2008 5:04 PM
You mean, the entire planet?
7) "Should you really eat that? Aren't you afraid your husband won't love you if you get fat?"8) "Women don't think, they just feel." 9) "Why are you so angry? Don't you think that's unfeminine?"10) "Women are like children, and need to be treated accordingly."
Posted by JetGirl70 September 18, 2008 5:11 PM
Gimme a break, nobody has ever said any of those things to you.
And to think some men actually think girls/women like being whistled at!?
Posted by fourthwave September 18, 2008 5:31 PM
They do, but that isn't why we do it. We don't give a fuck what you do or don't like.
1. being told to have more of a sense of humor when i don't laugh at degrading jokes2. being treated like a novelty because of identifying as feminist3. people thinking me crossing my legs is an invitation to ask about my sexuality4. not being able to order a drink because the name is disgusting5. having to defend simple ideas like "rape is bad" or "racism exists"6. having privilege and not knowing what to do about it7. the "men's interest" and "women's interest" periodical sections in bookstores8. movie posters 9. having liberalism attributed to being young and wanting to be "different"10. being pressured to like sports or at least pretend like i like sports
Posted by Rob.William September 18, 2008 5:32 PM
Okay, Feministing, I love your site but please ban these manginas. They are pissing me the fuck off.
As for this guy, he is obviously both a douche and a mangina, but is he also a faggot? I can't tell from this post, I need more information.
5. Prank callers on the rape-crisis hotline
Posted by Katie September 18, 2008 5:36 PM
Okay, that's pretty bad.
Those Glade Plug-Ins ads.
Posted by BrittneyBush September 18, 2008 5:51 PM
This chick fucking rules, that was actually the only item on her list. Those adds are really annoying.
Being programmed to think I will never be good in math or science, because I am a girl.
Posted by Lelah September 18, 2008 6:22 PM
That statement should simply read "being programmed to never be good in math or science, because I am a girl"
i hate it when i'm having a conversation with a man i've recently met... Feminism comes up, i mention my passion for it, politely ask his views about the topic and he says:
"I'm a MAN, why would i be a feminist/why should i care about feminism/why should i care about sexism?".
Posted by iheartchai September 18, 2008 6:29 PM
Just a suggestion, don't EVER ask a man what he thinks about feminism.
6. Being told I'm acting embarrassingly and combatively after I protest when, in a restaurant, one male friend refers to some husband's rape of his wife in a movie as "not really rape, because you could tell she kind of enjoyed it." Or when, in another restaurant, another male friend likened his sister to "a Muslim woman" for her subservience in relationships.
How dare he be politically incorrect. Fuck you bitch.
8. Women not winning enough shit! Like book deals, record contracts, presidencies and Pulitzers!
Women win way too much shit that they don't deserve. Women are incompetant and worthless.
9. When at work (I'm a reporter), avoiding calling the female lawyers on cases because I know pretty well that they're probably associates or in any case not lead counsel.
Posted by everybodyever September 18, 2008 6:33 PM
See, even you secretly know that women are incompetent and worthless.
3. women being devalued, denigrated, sexualized,insulted, etc., in movies. Not every female role has to revolve around men or titillating men!
Yes they do
5. women who feel threatened by other women, and the moments of weakness when I do as well.
Haha.
Posted by funkygroove September 18, 2008 6:57 PM
9. People who complain about the movie not being exactly like the book.
Posted by Toni September 18, 2008 7:04 PM
That one's pretty funny too. I do that all the time though.
5. Feeling too shy or outgunned to call people on their racist, sexist bullshit when I hear it. As if I'm the one with something to hide.
Posted by AnnaBella September 18, 2008 7:08 PM
You are. The last thing you need is your family and friends figuring out that you are a feminist cunt.
As a guy who recently learned that I has been far more sexist than I'd like to live with and has decided to change I'd just like say:
1. I have called some of my friends and peers "honey" or "sweetie" before. I'm sorry, I really am, some of my friends and I do still refer to each other like this but it is was sexist of me to assume others wouldn't find it patronizing. 2. I have made gay jokes, I used to think it was just a simple joke, luckily a friends of mine who is a gay student representative at my university helped enlighten me.3. I am still afraid to call myself a feminist, and I hate that.
and as for something that I could do without, being told I am not a feminist because I am a straight, white male and that I only say that for attention. It couldn't at all be because I respect my mother, sister and close friends and feel they deserve fair and equal treatment, no not at all.
Posted by cdstacker September 18, 2008 7:55 PM
Please kill yourself.
Re: "Smile." Oooh, that one makes me absolutely livid. The last guy who said that to me made me so incoherently angry that I shouted "I want to shoot you in your motherfucking face!!!1" Uhh... what an odd thing for me to say to someone. I'm not a violent person and have never held a gun, but "smile" really, really gets to me in a way that not many other things do.
I am not a decoration in a man's landscape.
Posted by lal46 September 18, 2008 11:59 PM
Yes you are, and that's all you are. Cunt.
1). Being told that feminists are just interested in sex.2). Being told I can't be a feminist as a man.3). Being distrusted because I'm male.4). Sexual assault, sexual harassment, patriarchy, etc.5). Feeling like I need to prove that not ALL men are sexist, chauvinist, potential rapists, etc.6). Having an extremely enlightened female friend say that I exhibit characteristics of 'progressive white male syndrome' (whatever the hell that is).7). Any term of endearment from any stranger.8). Leftwing sanctimony: Enough with 'making the world for a better place for our children' spiel; if you want to make the world a better place for your children, don't f*$kn' have any! 7 Billion people is enough!9). People expecting me to know everything because of my gender or ethnicity.10). Not being able to find enough feminist friends (of either/any gender) in supposedly progressive Seattle.
Posted by Devin September 19, 2008 12:34 AM
Kill yourself.
My Top Ten (Teen) Dating:1. Guys who think it’s “cute” that I’m “causey.” Or “interesting” that I am a feminist.2. Guys who lose interest when they discover that I would never want biological children, and that if I got pregnant would put the child up for adoption or force the father to take complete custody. I just hate having guys think that it’s wrong or weird--I’M SEVENTEEN!!! OF COURSE I DON’T WANT BABIES. I also feel that it is unfair that they think I am “cold” for wanting to put a career above settling down and having a family. Double standard much... And I think they are a bigger freak for making that a disqualification at our young age.3. Somehow managing to be a slut simply because I know more about sex than my guy friends. Which is kind of funny in and of itself because 1. I am a virgin, and 2. I am a virgin because I don’t want any of the nasty diseases that are going around.4. Being called “easy” for any of the following:Kissing on the first date. REALLY PEOPLE! COME ON! It’s a kiss. GET OVER IT!Having the audacity to ask the boys out.Being a flirt. I like to flirt. That means nothing besides I like to flirt.The mentality that doing anything makes me easy. The term itself makes it sound like anyone and everyone has access to my body. Somehow that smacks of rape culture. My body not being mine, but instead public property--the assumption that anyone can touch it. It just makes me really angry. And to quote the Hulk--you won’t like me when I’m angry.I am sick of guys calling girls sluts for being sexually active and patting their guy friends on the back for their sexual exploits.I am tired of guys saying I am “kinky” because I enjoy an intelligent conversation about sex and will discuss any form, style, orientation, choice, disease, etc. the same way I might discuss the latest releases at a theater. Just because I am open with a discussion on it does not mean that I am doing. Nor should we condemn those who chose to do it. I am just really tired of people being assumptive arseholes.I am sick of getting messages that guys thought they sent to their friends about me that prove they are just yet another jerkface. I am even sick of those messages that I don’t mistakenly recieve, but know they exist. I am sick that guys feel they have the right to talk about another HUMAN that way. I am sick of guys bragging about how they might “get somewhere with this one.”5. Guys who tell me that I am hot but not worth dating. Because I am:Too intimidating.Too independent. It just wouldn’t work.I’m fun, but I’m not girlfriend material.I’m a little too “easy.” For kissing too soon. I would love to hear that one in a Sleeping Beauty context. She didn’t even talk to the guy or agree to a scam, and she got kissed. Oh, right. Girls can’t initiate it. Because that is being “forward.”6. The fact that I am strong and independent and don’t need a boyfriend to complete me and make me feel better about myself making me undateable. Also the fact that I have an ego, am self-assured, and know that I am gorgeous and intelligent and sexy working against me. I like my confidence. If you don’t shove it. I also don’t like being told I am beautiful by guys too often--I want people to like me because I am fun, have a great sense of humor, and am intelligent--not because there is an eleven inch difference between my bust and my waist.7. Shallow guys. Especially ugly shallow guys. Especially nerdy ugly shallow guys.8. Guys who think that because I was flirting with them I am automatically going to say yes to a date.9. Creepy old men stalkers. Especially creepy old men stalkers who want a relationship and we could “work out” the fact that I have parents. And that I am a minor. Plus that they ignore that I have told them I am uninterested because they are too old because I am apparently I am young and “don’t know what I want,” and will realize I want a “real man” and want to date them. Puke now.10. The inability to find a guy who can withstand the stregnth of my personality and not be patronizing about it.
Posted by Shopgirl152 September 19, 2008 12:42 AM
Okay, listen to me girl, you got problems. That's all I'm gonna say.
6. My Mom giving my husband the bigger plate of food( he is a man so he needs to eat more).
Posted by penny rose September 19, 2008 1:15 AM
Or maybe because he's FUCKING BIGGER THAN YOU? Maybe she knows that he FUCKING EATS MORE THAN YOU DO?
4. Having to explain to otherwise reasonably feminist people that it's not okay to suggest that rape victims bring it on themselves by comparing a woman who gets raped because she was alone and/or provocatively dressed to a man who gets mugged because he walked in a bad neighbourhood.
It's the exact same thing
5. Not being able to feel safe when walking alone in the dark, even when it's still early and I'm walking along busy main roads.
I think it's funny
Posted by wavesandmoon September 19, 2008 2:08 AM
There's more of this endless crap, but that's enough for right now
This is from Samhita's list:
9. Shops that don't carry larger than a size 8.
Why should a private business cater to your fat ass you stupid cunt?
8. Body hair removal.
What the fuck do you care if people get their body hair removed you dumb harlot?
5. Progressive men that do sexist shit.
You mean that you don't like it when liberal guys kiss your ugly ass insufficiently? Fuck you bitch.
4. The McCain/Palin ticket.
At least you mentioned McCain. You are a cunt.
3. Having my weight scrutinized by friends and family on a regular basis even though I am a grown ass woman and it is none of your business.
Maybe if you weren't such a fat ass they wouldn't worry about it so much
1. Dating.
I don't like dating either, which is why I DON'T FUCKING DO IT. Stop being a whiny cunt.
That's a wrap for Samhita, lets go on to the dumbass comentators.
Yes!!!
I hate family commenting on my weight in the guise of "are you eating healthy at school? are you going to take a dance class?" aka "you look fat" and i get the same crap from my doctor, "you're healthy, but..."
Posted by Molly September 24, 2008 11:40 AM
Molly, it sounds like you are a fat ho.
About the weight issue--I hate it when I complain about my weight and my S.O. says "well I think you look beautiful." I understand he is trying to be sweet, but who the f cares what he thinks? It's not about what he thinks of me...it's how I feel about myself. When will men realize it's NOT ALWAYS ABOUT THEM!?
Posted by Bee September 24, 2008 2:24 PM
Holy shit.
A smug asshole telling me, "don't you get it? you will ALWAYS be judged by the way you look".
Posted by Chartreus September 24, 2008 9:51 PM
That guy is the man.
5. The once a month weigh in over the phone. Mom or Dad: "How's your health? Have you put on any weight?" Me: "I'm 5 feet 2 inches and I weigh about 125 pounds, which is average! Why do you keep asking?" Mom or Dad: "Hmmm, be careful. Eat properly" Eh?!
125 at 5'2 is not average you fat ho bag.
10. Two words: "women's issues"
Posted by Courtney - September 18, 2008, at 04:35PM in Sexism
You may just be the biggest crybaby whore to ever live. Feminists are the ones who created "women's issues". You are a total cunt.
.4. Feeling ugly without makeup.
You are probably just as ugly with it.
7. Feeling too intimidated to confront certain people on their oppressive attitudes or actions
Haha, not so tough when you aren't online are you? Dumb bitch.
10. People who take non-stranger rapes less seriously.
Posted by MHeald September 18, 2008 5:04 PM
You mean, the entire planet?
7) "Should you really eat that? Aren't you afraid your husband won't love you if you get fat?"8) "Women don't think, they just feel." 9) "Why are you so angry? Don't you think that's unfeminine?"10) "Women are like children, and need to be treated accordingly."
Posted by JetGirl70 September 18, 2008 5:11 PM
Gimme a break, nobody has ever said any of those things to you.
And to think some men actually think girls/women like being whistled at!?
Posted by fourthwave September 18, 2008 5:31 PM
They do, but that isn't why we do it. We don't give a fuck what you do or don't like.
1. being told to have more of a sense of humor when i don't laugh at degrading jokes2. being treated like a novelty because of identifying as feminist3. people thinking me crossing my legs is an invitation to ask about my sexuality4. not being able to order a drink because the name is disgusting5. having to defend simple ideas like "rape is bad" or "racism exists"6. having privilege and not knowing what to do about it7. the "men's interest" and "women's interest" periodical sections in bookstores8. movie posters 9. having liberalism attributed to being young and wanting to be "different"10. being pressured to like sports or at least pretend like i like sports
Posted by Rob.William September 18, 2008 5:32 PM
Okay, Feministing, I love your site but please ban these manginas. They are pissing me the fuck off.
As for this guy, he is obviously both a douche and a mangina, but is he also a faggot? I can't tell from this post, I need more information.
5. Prank callers on the rape-crisis hotline
Posted by Katie September 18, 2008 5:36 PM
Okay, that's pretty bad.
Those Glade Plug-Ins ads.
Posted by BrittneyBush September 18, 2008 5:51 PM
This chick fucking rules, that was actually the only item on her list. Those adds are really annoying.
Being programmed to think I will never be good in math or science, because I am a girl.
Posted by Lelah September 18, 2008 6:22 PM
That statement should simply read "being programmed to never be good in math or science, because I am a girl"
i hate it when i'm having a conversation with a man i've recently met... Feminism comes up, i mention my passion for it, politely ask his views about the topic and he says:
"I'm a MAN, why would i be a feminist/why should i care about feminism/why should i care about sexism?".
Posted by iheartchai September 18, 2008 6:29 PM
Just a suggestion, don't EVER ask a man what he thinks about feminism.
6. Being told I'm acting embarrassingly and combatively after I protest when, in a restaurant, one male friend refers to some husband's rape of his wife in a movie as "not really rape, because you could tell she kind of enjoyed it." Or when, in another restaurant, another male friend likened his sister to "a Muslim woman" for her subservience in relationships.
How dare he be politically incorrect. Fuck you bitch.
8. Women not winning enough shit! Like book deals, record contracts, presidencies and Pulitzers!
Women win way too much shit that they don't deserve. Women are incompetant and worthless.
9. When at work (I'm a reporter), avoiding calling the female lawyers on cases because I know pretty well that they're probably associates or in any case not lead counsel.
Posted by everybodyever September 18, 2008 6:33 PM
See, even you secretly know that women are incompetent and worthless.
3. women being devalued, denigrated, sexualized,insulted, etc., in movies. Not every female role has to revolve around men or titillating men!
Yes they do
5. women who feel threatened by other women, and the moments of weakness when I do as well.
Haha.
Posted by funkygroove September 18, 2008 6:57 PM
9. People who complain about the movie not being exactly like the book.
Posted by Toni September 18, 2008 7:04 PM
That one's pretty funny too. I do that all the time though.
5. Feeling too shy or outgunned to call people on their racist, sexist bullshit when I hear it. As if I'm the one with something to hide.
Posted by AnnaBella September 18, 2008 7:08 PM
You are. The last thing you need is your family and friends figuring out that you are a feminist cunt.
As a guy who recently learned that I has been far more sexist than I'd like to live with and has decided to change I'd just like say:
1. I have called some of my friends and peers "honey" or "sweetie" before. I'm sorry, I really am, some of my friends and I do still refer to each other like this but it is was sexist of me to assume others wouldn't find it patronizing. 2. I have made gay jokes, I used to think it was just a simple joke, luckily a friends of mine who is a gay student representative at my university helped enlighten me.3. I am still afraid to call myself a feminist, and I hate that.
and as for something that I could do without, being told I am not a feminist because I am a straight, white male and that I only say that for attention. It couldn't at all be because I respect my mother, sister and close friends and feel they deserve fair and equal treatment, no not at all.
Posted by cdstacker September 18, 2008 7:55 PM
Please kill yourself.
Re: "Smile." Oooh, that one makes me absolutely livid. The last guy who said that to me made me so incoherently angry that I shouted "I want to shoot you in your motherfucking face!!!1" Uhh... what an odd thing for me to say to someone. I'm not a violent person and have never held a gun, but "smile" really, really gets to me in a way that not many other things do.
I am not a decoration in a man's landscape.
Posted by lal46 September 18, 2008 11:59 PM
Yes you are, and that's all you are. Cunt.
1). Being told that feminists are just interested in sex.2). Being told I can't be a feminist as a man.3). Being distrusted because I'm male.4). Sexual assault, sexual harassment, patriarchy, etc.5). Feeling like I need to prove that not ALL men are sexist, chauvinist, potential rapists, etc.6). Having an extremely enlightened female friend say that I exhibit characteristics of 'progressive white male syndrome' (whatever the hell that is).7). Any term of endearment from any stranger.8). Leftwing sanctimony: Enough with 'making the world for a better place for our children' spiel; if you want to make the world a better place for your children, don't f*$kn' have any! 7 Billion people is enough!9). People expecting me to know everything because of my gender or ethnicity.10). Not being able to find enough feminist friends (of either/any gender) in supposedly progressive Seattle.
Posted by Devin September 19, 2008 12:34 AM
Kill yourself.
My Top Ten (Teen) Dating:1. Guys who think it’s “cute” that I’m “causey.” Or “interesting” that I am a feminist.2. Guys who lose interest when they discover that I would never want biological children, and that if I got pregnant would put the child up for adoption or force the father to take complete custody. I just hate having guys think that it’s wrong or weird--I’M SEVENTEEN!!! OF COURSE I DON’T WANT BABIES. I also feel that it is unfair that they think I am “cold” for wanting to put a career above settling down and having a family. Double standard much... And I think they are a bigger freak for making that a disqualification at our young age.3. Somehow managing to be a slut simply because I know more about sex than my guy friends. Which is kind of funny in and of itself because 1. I am a virgin, and 2. I am a virgin because I don’t want any of the nasty diseases that are going around.4. Being called “easy” for any of the following:Kissing on the first date. REALLY PEOPLE! COME ON! It’s a kiss. GET OVER IT!Having the audacity to ask the boys out.Being a flirt. I like to flirt. That means nothing besides I like to flirt.The mentality that doing anything makes me easy. The term itself makes it sound like anyone and everyone has access to my body. Somehow that smacks of rape culture. My body not being mine, but instead public property--the assumption that anyone can touch it. It just makes me really angry. And to quote the Hulk--you won’t like me when I’m angry.I am sick of guys calling girls sluts for being sexually active and patting their guy friends on the back for their sexual exploits.I am tired of guys saying I am “kinky” because I enjoy an intelligent conversation about sex and will discuss any form, style, orientation, choice, disease, etc. the same way I might discuss the latest releases at a theater. Just because I am open with a discussion on it does not mean that I am doing. Nor should we condemn those who chose to do it. I am just really tired of people being assumptive arseholes.I am sick of getting messages that guys thought they sent to their friends about me that prove they are just yet another jerkface. I am even sick of those messages that I don’t mistakenly recieve, but know they exist. I am sick that guys feel they have the right to talk about another HUMAN that way. I am sick of guys bragging about how they might “get somewhere with this one.”5. Guys who tell me that I am hot but not worth dating. Because I am:Too intimidating.Too independent. It just wouldn’t work.I’m fun, but I’m not girlfriend material.I’m a little too “easy.” For kissing too soon. I would love to hear that one in a Sleeping Beauty context. She didn’t even talk to the guy or agree to a scam, and she got kissed. Oh, right. Girls can’t initiate it. Because that is being “forward.”6. The fact that I am strong and independent and don’t need a boyfriend to complete me and make me feel better about myself making me undateable. Also the fact that I have an ego, am self-assured, and know that I am gorgeous and intelligent and sexy working against me. I like my confidence. If you don’t shove it. I also don’t like being told I am beautiful by guys too often--I want people to like me because I am fun, have a great sense of humor, and am intelligent--not because there is an eleven inch difference between my bust and my waist.7. Shallow guys. Especially ugly shallow guys. Especially nerdy ugly shallow guys.8. Guys who think that because I was flirting with them I am automatically going to say yes to a date.9. Creepy old men stalkers. Especially creepy old men stalkers who want a relationship and we could “work out” the fact that I have parents. And that I am a minor. Plus that they ignore that I have told them I am uninterested because they are too old because I am apparently I am young and “don’t know what I want,” and will realize I want a “real man” and want to date them. Puke now.10. The inability to find a guy who can withstand the stregnth of my personality and not be patronizing about it.
Posted by Shopgirl152 September 19, 2008 12:42 AM
Okay, listen to me girl, you got problems. That's all I'm gonna say.
6. My Mom giving my husband the bigger plate of food( he is a man so he needs to eat more).
Posted by penny rose September 19, 2008 1:15 AM
Or maybe because he's FUCKING BIGGER THAN YOU? Maybe she knows that he FUCKING EATS MORE THAN YOU DO?
4. Having to explain to otherwise reasonably feminist people that it's not okay to suggest that rape victims bring it on themselves by comparing a woman who gets raped because she was alone and/or provocatively dressed to a man who gets mugged because he walked in a bad neighbourhood.
It's the exact same thing
5. Not being able to feel safe when walking alone in the dark, even when it's still early and I'm walking along busy main roads.
I think it's funny
Posted by wavesandmoon September 19, 2008 2:08 AM
There's more of this endless crap, but that's enough for right now
Monday, July 7, 2008
The Lie of Black Feminism
Question: Is Feminism just for snooty white women or is it also for "women of color", particularly black women?
Answer: It is just for white women.
but wait a minute, aren't there black Feminists?
No. No, there are not.
We saw this in the Democratic primary. ALL white Feminists supported Hillary Clinton, who is seen by them as a Feminist icon. Did black women follow suit? No, of course they didn't, they supported Obama and frequently attacked Hillary supporters as entitled white girls who just didn't get it.
This is because whereas white Feminists see themselves first and foremost as women, black Feminists see themselves first and foremost as black. That means that it is impossible for a black woman to ever be a true Feminist, which means that Feminism really is exclusively for bitchy white women.
Answer: It is just for white women.
but wait a minute, aren't there black Feminists?
No. No, there are not.
We saw this in the Democratic primary. ALL white Feminists supported Hillary Clinton, who is seen by them as a Feminist icon. Did black women follow suit? No, of course they didn't, they supported Obama and frequently attacked Hillary supporters as entitled white girls who just didn't get it.
This is because whereas white Feminists see themselves first and foremost as women, black Feminists see themselves first and foremost as black. That means that it is impossible for a black woman to ever be a true Feminist, which means that Feminism really is exclusively for bitchy white women.
Sunday, May 4, 2008
Billy Jean King sucks
This isn't original, for an MRA to be mocking the whole Billie Jean King v Bobby Riggs match but I'm doing it anyway.
I think that Billie Jean King was/is a feminist cunt. A lot of people seem to believe she is a lezzie but as far as I know she is actually bi-sexual, which is even more gross.
Bobby Riggs really let us all down by losing the match. I want you to keep something in mind, this match took place in the 70's, so the social climate was totally different than today. If this match took place today everybody would be like: so? Even the hardcore feminist bitches probably wouldn't be able to do anymore than just fake some interests.
The 70's was the peak of the women's movement. The United States was an egiltarian country before the arrival of the Matriarchy in the 70's. Men were noticing feminism and becoming annoyed by it but at the end of the day it was still a bad joke to them. It was no joke to women though and a Bobby Riggs victory would have been a true slap in their face. It wouldn't have made any difference in the long run but it would have been funny.
The King-Riggs match is almost symbolic of the whole feminist movement. Men (Riggs) underestimated the seriousness of these uppity cunts (King) and have ended up losing at something we are exponitially better in. An in shape Bobby Riggs beats King 100 out of 100 times, even at age 55, but Riggs underestimated her and was caught off guard. Men beat women at everything 100 out of 100 times if we are on equal footing but when we get complacent women can sneak in a victory over us. That is how feminism succeeded, it caught us flat footed. Things are changing though. They are changing slowly, but changing nontheless.
I think that Billie Jean King was/is a feminist cunt. A lot of people seem to believe she is a lezzie but as far as I know she is actually bi-sexual, which is even more gross.
Bobby Riggs really let us all down by losing the match. I want you to keep something in mind, this match took place in the 70's, so the social climate was totally different than today. If this match took place today everybody would be like: so? Even the hardcore feminist bitches probably wouldn't be able to do anymore than just fake some interests.
The 70's was the peak of the women's movement. The United States was an egiltarian country before the arrival of the Matriarchy in the 70's. Men were noticing feminism and becoming annoyed by it but at the end of the day it was still a bad joke to them. It was no joke to women though and a Bobby Riggs victory would have been a true slap in their face. It wouldn't have made any difference in the long run but it would have been funny.
The King-Riggs match is almost symbolic of the whole feminist movement. Men (Riggs) underestimated the seriousness of these uppity cunts (King) and have ended up losing at something we are exponitially better in. An in shape Bobby Riggs beats King 100 out of 100 times, even at age 55, but Riggs underestimated her and was caught off guard. Men beat women at everything 100 out of 100 times if we are on equal footing but when we get complacent women can sneak in a victory over us. That is how feminism succeeded, it caught us flat footed. Things are changing though. They are changing slowly, but changing nontheless.
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Heavyweights 6 through 10
6. Jack Johnson: at ~6'1 and 208lbs he would be small by today's standards but was so fast and skilled that I don't see his lack of size hurting him too bad, or at all actually. Great fighter but since fighters back then basically sucked he had pretty weak opposition. He reminds me a lot of a bigger, stronger and faster version of Jersey Joe Walcott who gave an aged Joe Louis fits and had Rocky Marciano beat until getting clobbered by a huge right in the 13th round (which was the same round that Louis caught him in as well, 13 was definately an unlucky number for Jersey Joe).
7. Lennox Lewis: 6'5 240lbs. Big and very strong with crushing power in his right hand. Didn't really get the respect he was due until the Holyfield fights and the Holyfield he beat was past his prime but Lewis is still an all time great fighter. Great longevity at the top.
8. Sonny Liston: 6'0 1/2 212lbs. Big, scary, huge fists, long reach and a great jab, this guy absolutely cleaned out the division in the late 50's early 60's and punctuated his run with two crushing 1st round kayo's of Floyd Patterson.
9. Jack Dempsey: 6'1 187lbs. I really didn't want to put a guy this small and with such shitty comp on the list but I don't think this is a ridiculous rank for him. He had the ability to fight in a lot of different styles and beat some good big guys in Jess Willard and Angel Firpo in addition to absolutely destroying every white fighter in the division on his way up.
10. Joe Frazier: 5'11 205lbs. It's the loss to Foreman that really hurts his legacy but his other accomplishments are so great that he needs to be on this list. Foreman was a terrible match up for him. The other guys on this list could have all found a way to beat Foreman (I'm not saying they would, but it's possible), but if Frazier fought Foreman 100 times he would get knocked out within the first 3 rounds 100 times. Still a hell of a fighter though.
Rocky (Marciano) does not make this list as a basically view him as a less effective version of Smokin' Joe. I love the Rock, but I don't see him in the top 10.
p.s.: I'm pretty confident in having picked the 10 best heavyweights but I am not confident at all about the order I have put them in.
7. Lennox Lewis: 6'5 240lbs. Big and very strong with crushing power in his right hand. Didn't really get the respect he was due until the Holyfield fights and the Holyfield he beat was past his prime but Lewis is still an all time great fighter. Great longevity at the top.
8. Sonny Liston: 6'0 1/2 212lbs. Big, scary, huge fists, long reach and a great jab, this guy absolutely cleaned out the division in the late 50's early 60's and punctuated his run with two crushing 1st round kayo's of Floyd Patterson.
9. Jack Dempsey: 6'1 187lbs. I really didn't want to put a guy this small and with such shitty comp on the list but I don't think this is a ridiculous rank for him. He had the ability to fight in a lot of different styles and beat some good big guys in Jess Willard and Angel Firpo in addition to absolutely destroying every white fighter in the division on his way up.
10. Joe Frazier: 5'11 205lbs. It's the loss to Foreman that really hurts his legacy but his other accomplishments are so great that he needs to be on this list. Foreman was a terrible match up for him. The other guys on this list could have all found a way to beat Foreman (I'm not saying they would, but it's possible), but if Frazier fought Foreman 100 times he would get knocked out within the first 3 rounds 100 times. Still a hell of a fighter though.
Rocky (Marciano) does not make this list as a basically view him as a less effective version of Smokin' Joe. I love the Rock, but I don't see him in the top 10.
p.s.: I'm pretty confident in having picked the 10 best heavyweights but I am not confident at all about the order I have put them in.
"Girl Power" feminism
anyway, sorry this is late, let's talk about "girl power"
Girl Power feminism takes on the whole feminist ideal of "empowerment" but instead of adopting masculine values they keep up and sometimes even hype of the femininity. It is kind of a wierd contrast but it exists in about 70 percent of women in the west.
Girl Power feminists will almost always deny being feminists, they are usually in the the "I'm not a feminist, but..." camp. While Girl Power feminists do not necessarily dress and act like sluts, they usually do (which is good!) and they also see their sexuality as part of their power. Men are generally viewed as Neandrathals who more or less think exclusively with their dicks so they can be manipulated with sex, and most Girl Power feminists think that women are actually more intelligent than men to begin with.
Whereas a real Feminist spends all her time coming up with imaginary grievances against an imaginary Patriarchy that oppresses them, Girl Power feminists recognize the Matriarchy and use it to cash in. But they do not see the Matriarchy as having been created and upheld by mangina slave soldiers but rather by other "kick butt" women like themselves. They are delusional, and in several ways.
These Girl Power feminists think that Charlie's Angels and Alias are real life. What I mean is that they think young, nominally attractive* girls can beat the living shit out of several NFL sized brutes at the same time, let alone an average guy. Have you ever seen a girl play fighting with her boyfriend? Well let me clue you in on something that may shock you: when you see a girl play fighting with a guy, she doesn't know that he isn't trying.
I know how ridiculous that sounds but it is the truth. When you see a girl "beat up" her boyfriend she thinks that she just beat him up for real. Of course, she was "going easy on him" as well so you can imagine how bad the poor guy would have been thrashed had she actually been trying! Girls/women are totally clueless as to how physically weak they are.
My brothers girlfriend wanted to fight me once (in a friendly match, not to hurt me or anything) and I said I was willing to but told her she stood no chance because she couldn't even hang with my brother. She answered that she regularly beat my brother up in their play fights. I said, yeah, because he was not trying at all. She answered that yes he was. I was in disbelief that anyone could be so out of touch with reality so I told her, go ask him if he was trying. She asked him and was gueniunely shocked when he responded that ofcourse he wasn't trying to do anything except not hurt her.
This was not a uniquely dumb girl (she was actually unusually smart for a girl), all Kick Butt, Girl Power feminists are like this. Girl Power feminists genuinely believe themselves to be superior to guys, real Feminists make up excuses as to why they appear to be inferior. Real Feminists are much more in touch with reality and much less obnoxious.
in conclusion, all women are awful.
*none of the Charlie's Angels were actually hot. Lucy Lui: no. Cameron Diaz: God no. Drew Barrymore: nope, although she was pretty fuckin' fine in her cameo in Batman Forever. Jennifer Garner from Alias is okay, but nothing to write home about.
Girl Power feminism takes on the whole feminist ideal of "empowerment" but instead of adopting masculine values they keep up and sometimes even hype of the femininity. It is kind of a wierd contrast but it exists in about 70 percent of women in the west.
Girl Power feminists will almost always deny being feminists, they are usually in the the "I'm not a feminist, but..." camp. While Girl Power feminists do not necessarily dress and act like sluts, they usually do (which is good!) and they also see their sexuality as part of their power. Men are generally viewed as Neandrathals who more or less think exclusively with their dicks so they can be manipulated with sex, and most Girl Power feminists think that women are actually more intelligent than men to begin with.
Whereas a real Feminist spends all her time coming up with imaginary grievances against an imaginary Patriarchy that oppresses them, Girl Power feminists recognize the Matriarchy and use it to cash in. But they do not see the Matriarchy as having been created and upheld by mangina slave soldiers but rather by other "kick butt" women like themselves. They are delusional, and in several ways.
These Girl Power feminists think that Charlie's Angels and Alias are real life. What I mean is that they think young, nominally attractive* girls can beat the living shit out of several NFL sized brutes at the same time, let alone an average guy. Have you ever seen a girl play fighting with her boyfriend? Well let me clue you in on something that may shock you: when you see a girl play fighting with a guy, she doesn't know that he isn't trying.
I know how ridiculous that sounds but it is the truth. When you see a girl "beat up" her boyfriend she thinks that she just beat him up for real. Of course, she was "going easy on him" as well so you can imagine how bad the poor guy would have been thrashed had she actually been trying! Girls/women are totally clueless as to how physically weak they are.
My brothers girlfriend wanted to fight me once (in a friendly match, not to hurt me or anything) and I said I was willing to but told her she stood no chance because she couldn't even hang with my brother. She answered that she regularly beat my brother up in their play fights. I said, yeah, because he was not trying at all. She answered that yes he was. I was in disbelief that anyone could be so out of touch with reality so I told her, go ask him if he was trying. She asked him and was gueniunely shocked when he responded that ofcourse he wasn't trying to do anything except not hurt her.
This was not a uniquely dumb girl (she was actually unusually smart for a girl), all Kick Butt, Girl Power feminists are like this. Girl Power feminists genuinely believe themselves to be superior to guys, real Feminists make up excuses as to why they appear to be inferior. Real Feminists are much more in touch with reality and much less obnoxious.
in conclusion, all women are awful.
*none of the Charlie's Angels were actually hot. Lucy Lui: no. Cameron Diaz: God no. Drew Barrymore: nope, although she was pretty fuckin' fine in her cameo in Batman Forever. Jennifer Garner from Alias is okay, but nothing to write home about.
Friday, April 4, 2008
Californication
anybody ever see this Showtime series called "Californication"
It stars David Duchovny playing the man he obviously wishes he was: a wiseass, womanizing writer. Sort of a dehydrated, grown up Holden Caufield on steroids. The guy is a jerk on the surface but also deep down loves the women in his life and all women in general. He is not a macho brute but at the same time is willing to throw down, particularly if the one of the women he loves are attacked or insulted. He's smart, witty, handsome (hell he's played by David Duchovny, don't get much more handsome than that, and I know that sounds gay) and masculine but in a "loveable", overgrown teenager way. And he is filthy rich, his fortune coming from his career as a brilliant writer. In short: he is the kind of guy that virtually every woman who isn't either a Feminist or a lezzie fantasizes about as their imaginary perfect guy.
The last part isn't meant to be an attack on woman but rather on Duchovny who obviously has based his whole fantasy alter ego on being the "perfect man" according to the standards of entitled bitchy women. But that is neither here nor there, I don't really give a shit about Duchovny's pathetic self image but I do give a shit about the "girl power" feminism that the show promotes.
First let me comment on the show, it is okay, not great, but okay. That said, on to the feminism of the show.
As I have explained in so many words before there are two main brands of feminism:
1. Strait feminism: these include everything from NOW to SCUM and make up over 25 percent of all Western women
2. Girl Power "kick butt" post-modern feminism: This category takes up about 70 percent of all women, and is much, much worse.
I have to go but will talk more about all of this later
It stars David Duchovny playing the man he obviously wishes he was: a wiseass, womanizing writer. Sort of a dehydrated, grown up Holden Caufield on steroids. The guy is a jerk on the surface but also deep down loves the women in his life and all women in general. He is not a macho brute but at the same time is willing to throw down, particularly if the one of the women he loves are attacked or insulted. He's smart, witty, handsome (hell he's played by David Duchovny, don't get much more handsome than that, and I know that sounds gay) and masculine but in a "loveable", overgrown teenager way. And he is filthy rich, his fortune coming from his career as a brilliant writer. In short: he is the kind of guy that virtually every woman who isn't either a Feminist or a lezzie fantasizes about as their imaginary perfect guy.
The last part isn't meant to be an attack on woman but rather on Duchovny who obviously has based his whole fantasy alter ego on being the "perfect man" according to the standards of entitled bitchy women. But that is neither here nor there, I don't really give a shit about Duchovny's pathetic self image but I do give a shit about the "girl power" feminism that the show promotes.
First let me comment on the show, it is okay, not great, but okay. That said, on to the feminism of the show.
As I have explained in so many words before there are two main brands of feminism:
1. Strait feminism: these include everything from NOW to SCUM and make up over 25 percent of all Western women
2. Girl Power "kick butt" post-modern feminism: This category takes up about 70 percent of all women, and is much, much worse.
I have to go but will talk more about all of this later
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Top 10 Heavyweights
Hear is my opinion of the 10 best heavyweights to ever fight in boxing. Modern boxing begain in 1892 and continues to the present.
1. Muhammed Ali (6'3 210lbs.): This guy could do it all. His most impressive accomplishments came long after his prime had ended. He was not immortal, nobody is, but he was the best of all time. He had the style to win any kind of fight.
2. Joe Louis (6'1.5 200lbs.): at 200lbs he might seem a little small by todays standards but size, while a factor, is grotesquly overrated. In the heavyweight division size is only an advantage to a point, then it becomes a detriment. Louis was an excellent technician and had brutal power with amazingly quick hands. I'd take Ali to beat him but if anybody could upset "The Greatest" it's him.
3. George Foreman (6'3.5 225lbs.): Probably the most physically impressive fighter ever. This guy was just a beast. He absolutely destroyed some great fighters. In his first career he just didn't have the maturity and confidence to get it done. Very few people rank him this high but I believe that while his accomplishments are that great (relatively speaking) that at his peak he really was that good of a fighter.
4. Mike Tyson (5'11 218lbs.): In his prime he was something to behold, sort of a hybrid of Joe Louis and Joe Frazier. He destroyed very big, very strong fighters before he began his rather rapid collapse. He probably could have been the greatest heavyweight ever but like Foreman, mental issues prevented him from achieving his full potential.
5. Evander Holyfield (6'2 215lbs): If he and Mike had met in their respective primes I don't think Holyfield would have won, but he might have. A great fighter who almost undoubtably used steroids to muscle up. Not overwhelmingly powerful but tough and with no glaring weaknesses.
I'll post 6-10 later, don't feel like it now
1. Muhammed Ali (6'3 210lbs.): This guy could do it all. His most impressive accomplishments came long after his prime had ended. He was not immortal, nobody is, but he was the best of all time. He had the style to win any kind of fight.
2. Joe Louis (6'1.5 200lbs.): at 200lbs he might seem a little small by todays standards but size, while a factor, is grotesquly overrated. In the heavyweight division size is only an advantage to a point, then it becomes a detriment. Louis was an excellent technician and had brutal power with amazingly quick hands. I'd take Ali to beat him but if anybody could upset "The Greatest" it's him.
3. George Foreman (6'3.5 225lbs.): Probably the most physically impressive fighter ever. This guy was just a beast. He absolutely destroyed some great fighters. In his first career he just didn't have the maturity and confidence to get it done. Very few people rank him this high but I believe that while his accomplishments are that great (relatively speaking) that at his peak he really was that good of a fighter.
4. Mike Tyson (5'11 218lbs.): In his prime he was something to behold, sort of a hybrid of Joe Louis and Joe Frazier. He destroyed very big, very strong fighters before he began his rather rapid collapse. He probably could have been the greatest heavyweight ever but like Foreman, mental issues prevented him from achieving his full potential.
5. Evander Holyfield (6'2 215lbs): If he and Mike had met in their respective primes I don't think Holyfield would have won, but he might have. A great fighter who almost undoubtably used steroids to muscle up. Not overwhelmingly powerful but tough and with no glaring weaknesses.
I'll post 6-10 later, don't feel like it now
Feminist lays down the law
Here is a comment from an uppity feminist bitch responding to some article about how Feminists should deal with MRA's or something. Since she is a woman, she has to go on endlessly but I did kind of like her comment/essay and it provides an interesting look into Feminist inspired paranoia and psychosis. She does make at least one very good point. Like I said, I'm starting to respect Feminists a little more after seeing "What Women Want" and am now more into general anti-womanism then true anti-feminism. Anyway, here is the ho's pseudo article thingy:
Could you be friends with someone who looked on you as less than human? No, because even if you thought you were friends with him, he wouldn’t think of you as a friend: you can only be friends with your equals, and an anti-feminist man does not think of women as equals.
You said it, Jes.
This is why I cannot even “be friends with” or at this point, even tolerate the RL company of conservative guys, even the ones I used to think of as friends for all my past life as a conservative anti-feminist woman.
I've never trusted supposed female "anti feminists". There are very few women who aren't feminists. It doesn't take much to turn a modern woman into a Feminist.
And why I won’t date the meo-lib sexist guys, even the “nice” ones I run into who I can at least talk with, after I find out that they think that feminism is as bad as male chauvinism, that women aren’t really discriminated against in the workplace, that everything really *is* equal and we should just stop talking about the past or “exaggerating” the problems we face because most guys aren’t like that and my experiences of decades of sexism at school, at home, at work and out and about are invalid, why I am resolutely and almost certainly permanently single.
Sounds like a future dyke to me. She is correct about modern liberal guys. First of all, all political liberals suck. Second of all while modern "nice guys" are huge mangina woman lovers they are not man hating Feminists, and are not sympathetic with man-hating feminism. They find it threatening. It is unsurprising that a man-hater cannot find a man. Were I interested in relationships with women myself I would have to drop my woman-hating. People don't want to be in a relationship with somebody who hates their sex.
Because how can I *engage* with (much less be engaged *to*) someone who does not consider me to be a full person?
::buzzer sound:: You got it all wrong missy. I talk to guys of all walks of life all the time and I can guarantee you that very, very few men really consider women less than them. Sure on some basic level they know that men are superior but they respect women and like to see them accomplish things and show men up. They criticize chauvinists (like me) for being "insecure". Most men are guenuine woman lovers who only really consider themselves superior to women in terms of physical size and strength. I wish this wasn't the truth but it is. It isn't my opinion, it is a fact.
Who actually *says* and argues and thinks it’s reasonable to - as so many conservative intellectuals do, and have said so *in my presence* - to believe that “women have less being” than men, and engage in all kinds of pretzel-logic sophistry to explain why they’re not really bigots, it’s just that women aren’t as good as men
Alright, this I like. This bitch is doing something even 95% of men can't do: she is calling a spade a spade and saying, "no more bullshit". This chick does not tolerate double talk. She is no bullshit, just business. I respect that.
- or we’re good in “different” ways, so it’s fine to shove us out of the spheres we try to enter if we’re too stupid to know our place, ‘equal but separate,” doncha know–
Yeah, I hear that. This whole "women belong at home" thing is baloney. Some women would be happy with that kinda life but some women are as driven as some men and they got every right to go out there and compete. If they start bitching about "opression" or talking about how "independent" and "equal" they are then they deserve a smack across the face. Nobody wants to hear that shit. But if they get the job done they deserve respect, and they will get it.
If I know that a man thinks of me as some cross between a servo-droid, a collie dog and a piece of fudge, how can I discuss anything with him except on the most superficial level? Everything he says is tainted with that “yes but you belong segregated, your value is between your legs, nothing you say means as much as the dumbest XY git’s beery drivelings” - and most of them do, as evidenced by the belief that I should be complimented when told that “you’re not like most girls, wow, you’re almost as good as a man at X!”
That is not at all how most guys think. Even I don't think about women in nearly so condescending a fashion. Let's say you fix something and I man says "wow, most girls can't do that", its because in his experience most girls can't fix shit and he is impressed that you have blown his stereotype. Stereotypes aren't based on nothing.
The only way to be treated as person at all is to unsex yourself, like Lady Macbeth
In college my mom wrote a paper about how Lady MacBeth was a great feminist and a true heroine who was trying to get ahead in a patriarchal time. Her professor gave her an F and said it was the worst paper he ever read.
- and that is a very limited and impermanent sort of state, where (as happens to me regularly) the “chivalrous” guys, many of them vets, will apologize for even mentioning, oh, Korean bargirls and massages in Thailand, if they happen to be talking “guy stuff” together without realizing I was in earshot. Because I present as somewhere between “not-woman” and “good girl” (I fix computers, but I’m not very “butch” looking), they feel ashamed for sullying/insulting me with the consciousness that I’m one of those disgusting-but-yummy She-Things, as if I were non-white or gay and heard them talking about “those ___s” and they hastened to assure me that “you’re not like the rest of them”.
Well, she does have a point but she is reading too much in to it. If they are saying overtly sexist stuff that is one thing but if they are just talking about chicks they banged then apologizing is just the gentlemenly thing to do cause they understand you might be uncomfortable hearing that shit. Girls talk about guys the same way so you really are off base. It isn't the same thing as racism.
And that’s as good as it’s going to get, and better than the usual. The women who present as femmy, and worse yet are openly sexual, talking about their boyfriends or ex-husbands or movie-star fantasy boytoys in the typical Cosmo style, get treated like shit, put down constantly as stupid, as well as slutty/predatory, and having to hear coarse male fantasies directed at them (”all in good fun”), everywhere I’ve worked. And they eat that shit and smile and come back for more, because they’re not feminists, and they don’t know any other way to be.
Good point. They probably like it though. And I guarantee you those kind of women are far and away the most uppity. I hate bitches like that (i.e. almost all women). I'd rather work with a bitter dyke like you.
Maybe - if you excise *all* discussion of anything that pertains to half the human race’s interactions with the other half, yes the male chauvinists make some good points about something once in a while. Nothing says that somone can’t be sexist pig and a good meteorologist, frex.
But why would I, or any woman, want to be around that voluntarily, and obliged to pretend to be happy and content with it? Constantly ignoring piles of steaming elephant dung gets old very quickly, and biting one’s tongue because one is not allowed to point out that there is an elephant in the living room leaving turds everywhere leaves one with a very sore tongue very fast.
I thought that part was pretty weak.
Could you be friends with someone who looked on you as less than human? No, because even if you thought you were friends with him, he wouldn’t think of you as a friend: you can only be friends with your equals, and an anti-feminist man does not think of women as equals.
You said it, Jes.
This is why I cannot even “be friends with” or at this point, even tolerate the RL company of conservative guys, even the ones I used to think of as friends for all my past life as a conservative anti-feminist woman.
I've never trusted supposed female "anti feminists". There are very few women who aren't feminists. It doesn't take much to turn a modern woman into a Feminist.
And why I won’t date the meo-lib sexist guys, even the “nice” ones I run into who I can at least talk with, after I find out that they think that feminism is as bad as male chauvinism, that women aren’t really discriminated against in the workplace, that everything really *is* equal and we should just stop talking about the past or “exaggerating” the problems we face because most guys aren’t like that and my experiences of decades of sexism at school, at home, at work and out and about are invalid, why I am resolutely and almost certainly permanently single.
Sounds like a future dyke to me. She is correct about modern liberal guys. First of all, all political liberals suck. Second of all while modern "nice guys" are huge mangina woman lovers they are not man hating Feminists, and are not sympathetic with man-hating feminism. They find it threatening. It is unsurprising that a man-hater cannot find a man. Were I interested in relationships with women myself I would have to drop my woman-hating. People don't want to be in a relationship with somebody who hates their sex.
Because how can I *engage* with (much less be engaged *to*) someone who does not consider me to be a full person?
::buzzer sound:: You got it all wrong missy. I talk to guys of all walks of life all the time and I can guarantee you that very, very few men really consider women less than them. Sure on some basic level they know that men are superior but they respect women and like to see them accomplish things and show men up. They criticize chauvinists (like me) for being "insecure". Most men are guenuine woman lovers who only really consider themselves superior to women in terms of physical size and strength. I wish this wasn't the truth but it is. It isn't my opinion, it is a fact.
Who actually *says* and argues and thinks it’s reasonable to - as so many conservative intellectuals do, and have said so *in my presence* - to believe that “women have less being” than men, and engage in all kinds of pretzel-logic sophistry to explain why they’re not really bigots, it’s just that women aren’t as good as men
Alright, this I like. This bitch is doing something even 95% of men can't do: she is calling a spade a spade and saying, "no more bullshit". This chick does not tolerate double talk. She is no bullshit, just business. I respect that.
- or we’re good in “different” ways, so it’s fine to shove us out of the spheres we try to enter if we’re too stupid to know our place, ‘equal but separate,” doncha know–
Yeah, I hear that. This whole "women belong at home" thing is baloney. Some women would be happy with that kinda life but some women are as driven as some men and they got every right to go out there and compete. If they start bitching about "opression" or talking about how "independent" and "equal" they are then they deserve a smack across the face. Nobody wants to hear that shit. But if they get the job done they deserve respect, and they will get it.
If I know that a man thinks of me as some cross between a servo-droid, a collie dog and a piece of fudge, how can I discuss anything with him except on the most superficial level? Everything he says is tainted with that “yes but you belong segregated, your value is between your legs, nothing you say means as much as the dumbest XY git’s beery drivelings” - and most of them do, as evidenced by the belief that I should be complimented when told that “you’re not like most girls, wow, you’re almost as good as a man at X!”
That is not at all how most guys think. Even I don't think about women in nearly so condescending a fashion. Let's say you fix something and I man says "wow, most girls can't do that", its because in his experience most girls can't fix shit and he is impressed that you have blown his stereotype. Stereotypes aren't based on nothing.
The only way to be treated as person at all is to unsex yourself, like Lady Macbeth
In college my mom wrote a paper about how Lady MacBeth was a great feminist and a true heroine who was trying to get ahead in a patriarchal time. Her professor gave her an F and said it was the worst paper he ever read.
- and that is a very limited and impermanent sort of state, where (as happens to me regularly) the “chivalrous” guys, many of them vets, will apologize for even mentioning, oh, Korean bargirls and massages in Thailand, if they happen to be talking “guy stuff” together without realizing I was in earshot. Because I present as somewhere between “not-woman” and “good girl” (I fix computers, but I’m not very “butch” looking), they feel ashamed for sullying/insulting me with the consciousness that I’m one of those disgusting-but-yummy She-Things, as if I were non-white or gay and heard them talking about “those ___s” and they hastened to assure me that “you’re not like the rest of them”.
Well, she does have a point but she is reading too much in to it. If they are saying overtly sexist stuff that is one thing but if they are just talking about chicks they banged then apologizing is just the gentlemenly thing to do cause they understand you might be uncomfortable hearing that shit. Girls talk about guys the same way so you really are off base. It isn't the same thing as racism.
And that’s as good as it’s going to get, and better than the usual. The women who present as femmy, and worse yet are openly sexual, talking about their boyfriends or ex-husbands or movie-star fantasy boytoys in the typical Cosmo style, get treated like shit, put down constantly as stupid, as well as slutty/predatory, and having to hear coarse male fantasies directed at them (”all in good fun”), everywhere I’ve worked. And they eat that shit and smile and come back for more, because they’re not feminists, and they don’t know any other way to be.
Good point. They probably like it though. And I guarantee you those kind of women are far and away the most uppity. I hate bitches like that (i.e. almost all women). I'd rather work with a bitter dyke like you.
Maybe - if you excise *all* discussion of anything that pertains to half the human race’s interactions with the other half, yes the male chauvinists make some good points about something once in a while. Nothing says that somone can’t be sexist pig and a good meteorologist, frex.
But why would I, or any woman, want to be around that voluntarily, and obliged to pretend to be happy and content with it? Constantly ignoring piles of steaming elephant dung gets old very quickly, and biting one’s tongue because one is not allowed to point out that there is an elephant in the living room leaving turds everywhere leaves one with a very sore tongue very fast.
I thought that part was pretty weak.
Sunday, January 20, 2008
For the Ladies: How to Attract a Guy
MRA's are often just bitter men who have flopped at relationships and place their failures at the feet of women. One frequent complaint they will make is that Western women ignore "nice guys" like them and instead go with total jerks. On that I have two points:
1. It is a mostly a myth
2. If you really were a "nice guy" you wouldn't blame women for the fact that you haven't been able to find one. This complaint is a contradiction within itself.
Anywayz... I was thinking about this subject so I decided to look up advice on the internet for men looking to attract girls and for girls looking to attract guys. The advice for guys was pretty gay, often self contradictory and just not really accurate but the advice for girls was absolutely pitiful. The advice to girls is absolutely all over the place: act stupid, act smart, be slutty, be un-slutty, be nice, be mean, be confident, act helpless, be a flirt, be shy, etc.
Enough is enough. If you are a girl trying to figure out how to attract a guy there is only ONE thing you can do. And it is none of the above, none are even close. You have a crush on a guy who doesn't even notice you? This is what you can do:
nothing.
That's right, nothing. If a guy is not feeling you there is absolutely nothing you can do to change that. Now if he is a gueniunely nice guy and he isn't out of your league then you can still get him by becoming friends with him and then maybe you can get him to develop an interest in you over time, but if you think there is a way you can dress, or act, or talk that will get an otherwise uninterested guy to fall for you... well, that isn't going to happen.
There, I saved you a lot of wasted time and aggravation. No need to thank me, charity is it's own reward.
1. It is a mostly a myth
2. If you really were a "nice guy" you wouldn't blame women for the fact that you haven't been able to find one. This complaint is a contradiction within itself.
Anywayz... I was thinking about this subject so I decided to look up advice on the internet for men looking to attract girls and for girls looking to attract guys. The advice for guys was pretty gay, often self contradictory and just not really accurate but the advice for girls was absolutely pitiful. The advice to girls is absolutely all over the place: act stupid, act smart, be slutty, be un-slutty, be nice, be mean, be confident, act helpless, be a flirt, be shy, etc.
Enough is enough. If you are a girl trying to figure out how to attract a guy there is only ONE thing you can do. And it is none of the above, none are even close. You have a crush on a guy who doesn't even notice you? This is what you can do:
nothing.
That's right, nothing. If a guy is not feeling you there is absolutely nothing you can do to change that. Now if he is a gueniunely nice guy and he isn't out of your league then you can still get him by becoming friends with him and then maybe you can get him to develop an interest in you over time, but if you think there is a way you can dress, or act, or talk that will get an otherwise uninterested guy to fall for you... well, that isn't going to happen.
There, I saved you a lot of wasted time and aggravation. No need to thank me, charity is it's own reward.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
What Women Cunt
This hilarious title was a play on the title of the Mel Gibson movie "What Women Want".
I didn't get to see the whole thing which was unfortunate cause it really wasn't that bad. At least the parts that I saw that is. It's about this sexist guy (Gibson) who somehow develops telepathy but can only read the thoughts of women. Now even I think that would be a cool ass power to have. If for no other reason than you could tell if chicks were in to you or not. But I digresss...
Anyway, I thought the movie was going to be feminist propaganda but it really wasn't. Instead it was just woman propaganda, which I have decided is much more offensive. I have redone the heiarchy of people in the following order:
Masculinists>Woman lovers>Man lovers>Feminists>Manginas>Women
Women are so gay it is not even funny. Atleast Feminists are upfront about where they are at and aren't such hypocritical pieces of dog shit. Feminists tend to be angry and delusional but relatively rational by woman standards. Plain women on the other hand just suck. They think they are so cool. Let's say you get in a (verbal) fight with a Feminist; chances are she won't threaten you with violence and she won't restort to shaming language as quick as do other women. Here is a typical verbal fight with a true feminist:
Me: women are gay
Feminist: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Me: Men make more money than women because we are smarter
Feminist: blah blah blah blah blah
Me: Most rapes are imaginary
Feminist: blah blah blah
Me: Hm... I never thought of it that way, thank you for this enlightening debate
Feminist: blah
Here on the other hand is a fight with a plain woman:
Me: women are gay
Woman: What?! Women are the shit! Women are so great! I will kick your ass!
Me: Men make more money than women because we are smarter
Woman: You are just a little boy! You are not a real man! You probably have a small dick! You are ugly! You can't get laid! You are gay!
Me: oh brother...
::by this point the woman will have gone into the emotional overload stage where she will just endlessly repeating the same insults/threats over and over::
Me: this is stupid ::I walk away::
::the woman keeps going on like the energinizer bunny, either oblivious or indifferent to the fact that I am no longer in her presence and cannot hear her blabbering. After she calms down she starts crying. Why the hell are women always crying?::
I didn't get to see the whole thing which was unfortunate cause it really wasn't that bad. At least the parts that I saw that is. It's about this sexist guy (Gibson) who somehow develops telepathy but can only read the thoughts of women. Now even I think that would be a cool ass power to have. If for no other reason than you could tell if chicks were in to you or not. But I digresss...
Anyway, I thought the movie was going to be feminist propaganda but it really wasn't. Instead it was just woman propaganda, which I have decided is much more offensive. I have redone the heiarchy of people in the following order:
Masculinists>Woman lovers>Man lovers>Feminists>Manginas>Women
Women are so gay it is not even funny. Atleast Feminists are upfront about where they are at and aren't such hypocritical pieces of dog shit. Feminists tend to be angry and delusional but relatively rational by woman standards. Plain women on the other hand just suck. They think they are so cool. Let's say you get in a (verbal) fight with a Feminist; chances are she won't threaten you with violence and she won't restort to shaming language as quick as do other women. Here is a typical verbal fight with a true feminist:
Me: women are gay
Feminist: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Me: Men make more money than women because we are smarter
Feminist: blah blah blah blah blah
Me: Most rapes are imaginary
Feminist: blah blah blah
Me: Hm... I never thought of it that way, thank you for this enlightening debate
Feminist: blah
Here on the other hand is a fight with a plain woman:
Me: women are gay
Woman: What?! Women are the shit! Women are so great! I will kick your ass!
Me: Men make more money than women because we are smarter
Woman: You are just a little boy! You are not a real man! You probably have a small dick! You are ugly! You can't get laid! You are gay!
Me: oh brother...
::by this point the woman will have gone into the emotional overload stage where she will just endlessly repeating the same insults/threats over and over::
Me: this is stupid ::I walk away::
::the woman keeps going on like the energinizer bunny, either oblivious or indifferent to the fact that I am no longer in her presence and cannot hear her blabbering. After she calms down she starts crying. Why the hell are women always crying?::
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
Attacking the Manginas
It's hard being a Masculinist, ya know? You got so many groups of enemies: women, other MRA's who are total idiots, woman lovers (most men fit this category) and hardcore Manginas. Woman lovers are best just ignored and idiot MRA's should only be occasionally taken to task. But the Manginas are tricky: on one hand, they are gay as shit... but on the other hand, they are still men so they are not the real enemy. In fact, you could make the case that Manginas are the Matriarchy's biggest victims.
That said, they can't be ignored and I am going to have to engage in some mangina bashing now, but I will preface my comments by saying that women are evil and worthless and are the true villians.
Aight, here's the deal. On Feministing there was this article about some ho who was sexually assaulted in a bar. What makes this different from the typical sexual assault is that the other guys in the bar either cheered on the act or ignored it. Supposedly this proves that women are opressed or that all men are rapist or that... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is supposed to prove but you get the idea. Here are select mangina comments in bold:
Hmm... I like to think that I'd do something in that situation, but I have never really been there myself. Some kid did pull a pocketknife on me in elementary school. As I recall I laughed it off and walked away; but that was just some kid on the schoolyard that I knew, not a stranger in a bar.
Closest is when a woman I go to school with caught up to me outside the train after having some guy grope her and follow her off the car (we were all going to a field trip that day, just recently). It is the only time I've made a serious and sincere offer to beat somebody, which in retrospect I'm not too proud of.
The guy did have a knife in this case, and that does change things... but as pointed out, it is a bar with plenty of heavy things around to swing about. I actually know a bit about defending against a knife and how to swing heavy things about to do some damage, but it's all in the head.
What I guess I'm trying to say is it's not something you know how you're going to react to until you're in the situation. Sitting back and laughing... that is something I can say for sure I wouldn't do.
Posted by: Matthew
Wow, what a flaming mangina. You threatened to beat another guy up on the say so of a woman? What a huge douche you are. He is now saying he isn't "proud" of his gayness but I suspect he probably is but just knew that such talk would not be well taken by the woman posters. Posts like this make me actually feel bad for feminists because they have to tolerate patronizing jackasses like this clown.
I've been in a situation similar to this before (though not with a knife as a potential weapon), and my experience was that if you at least challenge or confront the attacker, then other men will normally follow, or at least back you up if you are genuinely trying to stop this type of situation.
For all of them to just sit there and (presumably) keep drinking their beer without doing or say anything doesn't suggest a lot to me other than the fact they just didn't give a shit.
Posted by: Al
Give this mangina props for his straight shooting approach. It is correct and he is at least implying that the other men in the bar did the right thing by not coming to the woman's aid. Remember, never side with a woman over a man! That's the rule.
"So, there is this lockerroom trick where you get a guys underwear off of him without taking his pants off. It is not a sexual thing at all. Rough, humilating hazing, yes. Sexual, no. It just looked like this might be like that. If in the main article, she wouldn't even talk to the guy afterward, then not a friendly thing."
Perhaps you are missing the point that even male on male, unwanted contact could be legally considered battery. Even the threat of contact would be assault. Boys injuring or even killing another playing "pro wrestler" at home is also not considered a joke.
Maybe you would understand how being interested in a woman's panties (ie opposite gender) or removing them at knifepoint, makes it sexual. A sexual assault. This will be aided by her statement and testimony. I hope she makes it that far.
Yeah, I guess it was unfriendly. Hence the arrests and charges. The police seem to believe her, even if some men here do not. I really hope your daughters never have "jokey" "friends" like these. I have a daughter. I would track them down and kill them.
Posted by: A male
This guy is such a mangina he is actually posting under the name "a male". What a loser. He is also openly admitting he would side with his daughters over a man who rapes them. Not acceptable. If my sister ever got raped she would know better than to come to me for help because I know that most rapes are imaginary and that she is just trying to frame an innocent man. It is pathetic how willing men are to sell out other men for the benifit of women.
I'm a bartender, and the bar I work at can be pretty rough and tumble, and you know, I simply cannot believe that this woman would simply sit back and watch an assault happen. Like other posters have said, it is her JOB to keep order in the bar, and that's why tough feminist chicks like myself seem to be best for the job. At the very least she should have called the police, while telling the attackers that's what she was doing. In my experience, sometimes all you need to do to calm people down is pick up the damn phone. As for having to deal with those customers again, that kind of behavior is absolutely grounds for being 86'd for life. The bartender is the figure of authority in the bar, and usually people listen to me no matter how heated they are. And if they don't, and I don't have a bouncer in, I call the police. It works every time.
That said, they can't be ignored and I am going to have to engage in some mangina bashing now, but I will preface my comments by saying that women are evil and worthless and are the true villians.
Aight, here's the deal. On Feministing there was this article about some ho who was sexually assaulted in a bar. What makes this different from the typical sexual assault is that the other guys in the bar either cheered on the act or ignored it. Supposedly this proves that women are opressed or that all men are rapist or that... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is supposed to prove but you get the idea. Here are select mangina comments in bold:
Hmm... I like to think that I'd do something in that situation, but I have never really been there myself. Some kid did pull a pocketknife on me in elementary school. As I recall I laughed it off and walked away; but that was just some kid on the schoolyard that I knew, not a stranger in a bar.
Closest is when a woman I go to school with caught up to me outside the train after having some guy grope her and follow her off the car (we were all going to a field trip that day, just recently). It is the only time I've made a serious and sincere offer to beat somebody, which in retrospect I'm not too proud of.
The guy did have a knife in this case, and that does change things... but as pointed out, it is a bar with plenty of heavy things around to swing about. I actually know a bit about defending against a knife and how to swing heavy things about to do some damage, but it's all in the head.
What I guess I'm trying to say is it's not something you know how you're going to react to until you're in the situation. Sitting back and laughing... that is something I can say for sure I wouldn't do.
Posted by: Matthew
Wow, what a flaming mangina. You threatened to beat another guy up on the say so of a woman? What a huge douche you are. He is now saying he isn't "proud" of his gayness but I suspect he probably is but just knew that such talk would not be well taken by the woman posters. Posts like this make me actually feel bad for feminists because they have to tolerate patronizing jackasses like this clown.
I've been in a situation similar to this before (though not with a knife as a potential weapon), and my experience was that if you at least challenge or confront the attacker, then other men will normally follow, or at least back you up if you are genuinely trying to stop this type of situation.
For all of them to just sit there and (presumably) keep drinking their beer without doing or say anything doesn't suggest a lot to me other than the fact they just didn't give a shit.
Posted by: Al
Give this mangina props for his straight shooting approach. It is correct and he is at least implying that the other men in the bar did the right thing by not coming to the woman's aid. Remember, never side with a woman over a man! That's the rule.
"So, there is this lockerroom trick where you get a guys underwear off of him without taking his pants off. It is not a sexual thing at all. Rough, humilating hazing, yes. Sexual, no. It just looked like this might be like that. If in the main article, she wouldn't even talk to the guy afterward, then not a friendly thing."
Perhaps you are missing the point that even male on male, unwanted contact could be legally considered battery. Even the threat of contact would be assault. Boys injuring or even killing another playing "pro wrestler" at home is also not considered a joke.
Maybe you would understand how being interested in a woman's panties (ie opposite gender) or removing them at knifepoint, makes it sexual. A sexual assault. This will be aided by her statement and testimony. I hope she makes it that far.
Yeah, I guess it was unfriendly. Hence the arrests and charges. The police seem to believe her, even if some men here do not. I really hope your daughters never have "jokey" "friends" like these. I have a daughter. I would track them down and kill them.
Posted by: A male
This guy is such a mangina he is actually posting under the name "a male". What a loser. He is also openly admitting he would side with his daughters over a man who rapes them. Not acceptable. If my sister ever got raped she would know better than to come to me for help because I know that most rapes are imaginary and that she is just trying to frame an innocent man. It is pathetic how willing men are to sell out other men for the benifit of women.
I'm a bartender, and the bar I work at can be pretty rough and tumble, and you know, I simply cannot believe that this woman would simply sit back and watch an assault happen. Like other posters have said, it is her JOB to keep order in the bar, and that's why tough feminist chicks like myself seem to be best for the job. At the very least she should have called the police, while telling the attackers that's what she was doing. In my experience, sometimes all you need to do to calm people down is pick up the damn phone. As for having to deal with those customers again, that kind of behavior is absolutely grounds for being 86'd for life. The bartender is the figure of authority in the bar, and usually people listen to me no matter how heated they are. And if they don't, and I don't have a bouncer in, I call the police. It works every time.
I'm disgusted.
Posted by: Alexandra
Tough feminist chicks like herself? Jesus, what a bunch of bullshit. Yeah it takes a lot of balls to call the police or the bouncer. What a dumb ass ho.
Men don't help women because they just don't give a shit about women. The guys here who are trying to make it seem like a joke---88 or whomever---would probably be right there, cheering or blaming if it happened in front of them, unless it was their 'property.' Guys care what other guys think about them. They don't give a shit about women at all.
Posted by: ginmar
The triumphant return of ginmar! Seriously, this chick must have even less of a life I do since she seems to make about 100 posts a day each on about 50 different blogs. As for her point: if only it were so, Ginny. If only it were so.
Been away for awhile, being hit by a car and breaking your neck doesn't leave you up for being online, but, I have to comment here on a few things.
First, a whole article is rarely posted to this blog, BUT the link to the whole article ALWAYS is, if you want to read, go and read it.
Second, sexual assault is not funny when it is committed by a man against a woman, man against a man, woman against a woman, or woman against a man. If this had happened to a man, I would be the first one to stand up and say that it was fucked up.
I have a male friend who was raped by a woman. He is too ashamed to tell anyone but me for fear of being made fun of and that makes me sad. No one deserves that.
Posted by: SassyGirl
A woman cannot rape a man. Your friend is a lying sack of shit who was probably a woman in a past life.
Sorry the last two posts weren't manginas, I can never stay on topic. Feministing really needs to ban male posters, they are either ultra mangina's or idiots who are always like, "men get raped too!" as if anyone didn't know that. One problem with anti-feminism is that a lot of anti feminists have no real understanding of the ideology they claim to be against.
More Misogynist Fun!
Sorry about the long absence. I haven't posted in a while and my last couple posts didn't have anything to do with bashing women. But I am back!
For starters, let's go over some things that women are soley responsible for:
1. the extinction of the dinasours
2. the Ice Age
3. The fall of the Minoan Civilization
4. If Atlantis really existed, women are what caused it to be plunged into the sea
5. The fall of the Roman Empire
6. World War I
7. World War II
8. The Holocaust
9. A bunch of other shit
conclusion: women=bad
For starters, let's go over some things that women are soley responsible for:
1. the extinction of the dinasours
2. the Ice Age
3. The fall of the Minoan Civilization
4. If Atlantis really existed, women are what caused it to be plunged into the sea
5. The fall of the Roman Empire
6. World War I
7. World War II
8. The Holocaust
9. A bunch of other shit
conclusion: women=bad
Sunday, December 16, 2007
N'kisi the parrot
N'kisi is a parrot who has been taught by his owner, Aimee Morgana, to actually use language to communicate. Unlike most parrots who just repeat random shit N'kisi can actually hold a conversation.
Controversial researcher Rupert Sheldrake has run an experiment and concluded that N'kisi is mildly telepathic with Miss Morgana. Whether this is true or not the very fact that Sheldrake is associated with the bird has caused a lot of other researchers to stay clear so N'kisi's amazing use of language is not really being studied.
I'm talking about N'kisi because he is so cute! You can find audio of him online but this transcript of a conversation between N'kisi and Morgana is just too adorable for words:
N'Kisi: "Remember, we went in a car"
Aimee: "Yes! Did you like it?"
N'Kisi: "I like that - wanna go out in the car"
Aimee: "We can't, wo don't have a car now"
N'Kisi: "Wanna go in a car right now"
Aimee: "I'm sorry, we can't right now - maybe we can go again later"
N'kisi: "Why can't I go in a car now?"
Aimee: "Because we don't have one"
N'kisi: "Let's get a car"
Aimee: "No Kisi, we can't get a car now"
N'kisi: "I want a car"
Aimee: "I'm sorry, baby, not today"
N'kisi: "Hurry up, wanna go in a car. Remember? We were in a car"
Controversial researcher Rupert Sheldrake has run an experiment and concluded that N'kisi is mildly telepathic with Miss Morgana. Whether this is true or not the very fact that Sheldrake is associated with the bird has caused a lot of other researchers to stay clear so N'kisi's amazing use of language is not really being studied.
I'm talking about N'kisi because he is so cute! You can find audio of him online but this transcript of a conversation between N'kisi and Morgana is just too adorable for words:
N'Kisi: "Remember, we went in a car"
Aimee: "Yes! Did you like it?"
N'Kisi: "I like that - wanna go out in the car"
Aimee: "We can't, wo don't have a car now"
N'Kisi: "Wanna go in a car right now"
Aimee: "I'm sorry, we can't right now - maybe we can go again later"
N'kisi: "Why can't I go in a car now?"
Aimee: "Because we don't have one"
N'kisi: "Let's get a car"
Aimee: "No Kisi, we can't get a car now"
N'kisi: "I want a car"
Aimee: "I'm sorry, baby, not today"
N'kisi: "Hurry up, wanna go in a car. Remember? We were in a car"
Monday, December 10, 2007
Something in "The Mist"
Well, Steven King's "The Mist" has been made in to a movie. When I read "The Mist" (TM from now on) I thought two things:
1. What the fuck?! That's the ending? What? Shit!
2. If done right, it could be one of the greatest movies ever made.
TM is a novella that was really meant to be a movie. I knew if it was a movie that it would be done poorly thus ruining it but it actually was done okay. All in all, it was a decent, entertaining movie with a horrendusly shitty ending. The ending of the book is frustrating but really great and chilling when you think about it.
things that kept the movie from being even a fraction as great as it could have been:
1. not true enough to the book: it was much truer to the book than I expected but it could easilly have been even more so. They added some week stuff and took some other stuff out for no reason. Bunch of baloney.
2. special effects were week, they should have used puppets, ala "Alien" to make the monsters more realistic
3. The ending, they should have kept the original kickass ending and ditched the shitty ass new ending which is stupid, unscary and makes no sense whatsoever.
King gave the movie his "kosher" stamp which proves that he is a woman loving faggot whore.
1. What the fuck?! That's the ending? What? Shit!
2. If done right, it could be one of the greatest movies ever made.
TM is a novella that was really meant to be a movie. I knew if it was a movie that it would be done poorly thus ruining it but it actually was done okay. All in all, it was a decent, entertaining movie with a horrendusly shitty ending. The ending of the book is frustrating but really great and chilling when you think about it.
things that kept the movie from being even a fraction as great as it could have been:
1. not true enough to the book: it was much truer to the book than I expected but it could easilly have been even more so. They added some week stuff and took some other stuff out for no reason. Bunch of baloney.
2. special effects were week, they should have used puppets, ala "Alien" to make the monsters more realistic
3. The ending, they should have kept the original kickass ending and ditched the shitty ass new ending which is stupid, unscary and makes no sense whatsoever.
King gave the movie his "kosher" stamp which proves that he is a woman loving faggot whore.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Ron Paul: The Masculinist Canidate?
By now you probably have heard about Ron Paul... again and again and again. He doesn't get too much mainstream media coverage but he is the star of the internet. His campaign so far is kinda like Howard Dean meets Ross Perot. Internet driven with fanatical grassroots supporters who believe only he can save the country.
On matters of domestic policy, Paul is the only serious canidate who is serious about dismantling the Matriarchy. He also is actually honest, unlike everybody else in the race (except maybe Kucinich). But I cannot support him and actually am looking forward to voting against him. Why? Two reasons:
1. Foreign Policy: Paul is an isolationist/non-interventionist, meaning he doesn't want America to be all up in everybody's bieznass. I'm with him on that but he wants to immediately withdrawal from Iraq and I think that would be a huge mistake because Iraq would fall into civil war with devestating effects of the world oil market and consequently, the world economy. Gas prices are already way too high without making things even worse.
2. I dislike him personally and I absolutely revile his supporters. I know that sounds like a petty reason to be against somebody but you have to understand that when I say I "revile" his supporters, I am not engaging in hyperbole. I gueniunely have a white-hot hatred for his fans. They are so fucking annoying. I look forward to Paul losing in the primaries so I can witness their wailing and gnashing of teeth.
In conclusion I posted this because Ron Paul is an intriguing canidate and I'm tired of his piece of shit supporters, I also want to increase traffic to my blog and the very mention of "Ron Paul" is a sure fire way to do that.
Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul!
On matters of domestic policy, Paul is the only serious canidate who is serious about dismantling the Matriarchy. He also is actually honest, unlike everybody else in the race (except maybe Kucinich). But I cannot support him and actually am looking forward to voting against him. Why? Two reasons:
1. Foreign Policy: Paul is an isolationist/non-interventionist, meaning he doesn't want America to be all up in everybody's bieznass. I'm with him on that but he wants to immediately withdrawal from Iraq and I think that would be a huge mistake because Iraq would fall into civil war with devestating effects of the world oil market and consequently, the world economy. Gas prices are already way too high without making things even worse.
2. I dislike him personally and I absolutely revile his supporters. I know that sounds like a petty reason to be against somebody but you have to understand that when I say I "revile" his supporters, I am not engaging in hyperbole. I gueniunely have a white-hot hatred for his fans. They are so fucking annoying. I look forward to Paul losing in the primaries so I can witness their wailing and gnashing of teeth.
In conclusion I posted this because Ron Paul is an intriguing canidate and I'm tired of his piece of shit supporters, I also want to increase traffic to my blog and the very mention of "Ron Paul" is a sure fire way to do that.
Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul!
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Darren Mack: Hero of the Resistance
Darren Mack's trial has begun.
As you all know Dmac is on trial for killing his bitch ex-wife and the mangina judge in his family court case. The courts committed a grave injustice against him so he was left on his own to get justice for himself.
Mangina judge Chuck Weller did not handle himself well on the stand at all. More updates will come later. I can't wait to read the feminist reactions to the trial of this one man who has taken up arms against the Matriarchy.
As you all know Dmac is on trial for killing his bitch ex-wife and the mangina judge in his family court case. The courts committed a grave injustice against him so he was left on his own to get justice for himself.
Mangina judge Chuck Weller did not handle himself well on the stand at all. More updates will come later. I can't wait to read the feminist reactions to the trial of this one man who has taken up arms against the Matriarchy.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Sucks to be you, women
on some gay ass feminist site (I think Iblamethepatriarchy) the idiot author/authors wrote about this case of a teenage girl getting gang raped (allegedly) by some drunken college retards. The article was typical feminist blather but I want to analyse some of the comments.
Let's do it!
Sylvanite May 24th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
I’m officially sick of sports, the people who play sports, and the fans of sports. I would appreciate it very much if men everywhere decided that basket weaving and other arts and crafts were worthy manly pursuits. Preferably to be pursued while sober and miles from the nearest woman.
Diss!
2 ashes May 24th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
I’m crying. It’s day like this you just hate this whole rotten world.
What, are you serious? You are fucking crying over this? Jesus Christ, be a man.
3 Amanda Marcotte May 24th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Thank god for Nifong and the immoral media! The hoopla over the Duke case has now made it quite likely that gang rape will be tacitly legal, because prosecuters will be scared to death to prosecute.
Word! Way to fuck yourselves in the ass you stupid feminist dykes. Your errant mangina slave soldier Nifong really screwed you ho's. Hah!
4 Erin May 24th, 2007 at 4:41 pm
This is one of those things where my brain just shuts off. If I began to fully grasp the disgusting implications of this situation I think I’d have an aneurism. And I’m loving that ONE quote they are using from a witness throughout all the articles. “I didn’t think of it as a rape situation.” Can we hear from one of the women who took her to the hospital? Or how about the one guy who supposedly tried to stop it.
Because sweety, ink costs money and the paper isn't going to waste it printing a bunch of feminine nonsense.
5 Kumachka May 24th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Wash’t the idea of team sports to channel male aggression so they wouldn’t run around raping and pillaging? Or was it simply to tire them out so they wouldn’t question The Man?
6 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 4:49 pm
No.
The idea of team sports is to hone the skills necessary for success in life under a paradigm of dominance and submission.
7 trailer park May 24th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
No.
I just can’t comprehend how this could possibly be seen as anything but rape.
Some adult gave the victim alcohol, illegally. Three witnesses can testify that she was semi-conscious, vomiting (unable to keep anything down), and that they had to carry her out of the house she was so drunk. They can also testify that the men were holding the door closed. Why would they have to hold the door closed if this was consensual sex? AND SHE IS UNDERAGE! How is this not a crime?? HOW? How much more evidence do they need?
8 kanea May 24th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
Thanks to your premature ejaculation over the whole Duke thing, a lot more than they have, apparently.
there aren’t enough words in the two languages I know to discribe my disgust. I really really hope that some one (perhapse this school’s women’s lib group?) will start protests at sporting events. if this was my school those players would be the one’s who have to leave.
9 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Congradulations, your school is a liberal cesspool!
Why are these guys being treated like real athletes? These guys are on a *community* college team. What’s next? We’ll let the little league team commit larceny? This has absolutely nothing to do with sports.
10 Shabnam May 24th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Okay, that is just hilarious. Give credit where credit is due.
District Attorneys are elected aren’t they? Isn’t this problematic? (I’m not American, so correct me if I’m wrong). Is Dolores Carr trying to court the votes of Dude Nation?
11 badkitty May 24th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Is that some feminist code speak? I've never heard that phrase before. It sounds gay.
Two of the women who rescued the girl have spoken to the press.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/13370961/detail.html
12 Shabnam May 24th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
I'm too lazy to read the link so I won't comment.
Or the votes of men who really hate teenage girls. Unfortunately, perhaps that is not such a small constituency.
13 Joanna May 24th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Or the votes of men who are understandably weary of other men getting railroaded on the say so of a couple of drunken ho's.
And I would bet good money that the three young women who rescued this child are now being harassed.
14 vera May 24th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
Let's hope so.
In her election campaign, Carr had to battle expectations that she would not be independent enough of the police, because her husband is on the police force.
If I had any hope left, it would go toward the possibility that she will have something more to battle in the next election: an outraged public.
This morning I sent a letter to the state attorney general, hoping that someone in that office might think an investigation is in order. I don’t know, however, if that’s the correct office to contact.
15 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:25 pm
Sending a letter, that'll get things done.
Shabnam, Dolores Carr is trying to prove that she wasn’t lying when she got elected on a platform of “my San Jose police detective husband will in no way influence my decisions as DA.” True enough; ostensibly she and the cops depart wildly from each other on this case.
Oh, and she’s trying to court the votes of Dude Nation.
16 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
There it is again!
I see Vera has already answered Shabnam’s question. Someday I will understand blogs.
17 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Za?
The Sherriff’s ofice is keeping the case open.
“Sources told CBS 5 that the Sheriff’s Office was considering a range of options from re-starting the investigation, to re-filing on new, lesser charges against the baseball players for having unlawful sex with a minor, or furnishing a minor with alcohol.”
I get the impression that the sheriff is watching and waiting for has the rapist who committed the hit/run to strike again.
18 A. May 24th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Probably not.
Okay, the really devastating quotation for me is from the article linked by bad kitty. Speaking of the victim: “When they lifted her head up, her eyes moved and she said ‘I’m sorry.’”
jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?
19 redhead May 24th, 2007 at 5:31 pm
Cause she was drunk and didn't know what the hell was going on? Everybody says that they are sorry when they are drunk. I once apologized to my carpet for throwing up on it.
badkitty, thanks for the link. The lowlight is this, from one of the gang-rapers: “This is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.” She did what - gang-raped herself when she was so drunk she was vomiting and had to be carried out of the house?
20 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
Something like that.
“When they lifted her head up, her eyes moved and she said ‘I’m sorry.’â€
I do not have the ovaries to continue reading general coverage of this bullshit anymore, but jesus tapdancing christ. This is precisely why I write this fucking blog; I keep hoping, against all reason, that some parent somewhere will read it and think “Oh! Wow. Maybe I should try to imbue my son with some sense of T & B. And while I’m at it, maybe I should become a feminist.”
What's T and B?
21 redhead May 24th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?
She’s a woman in a patriarchy. She really shouldn’t be out in public, let alone thinking she has the right to drink at a party where there are men without relegating herself to the slut class.
22 Maryam May 24th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
No. See my earlier explanation above.
“This is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.â€
Excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall.
23 delphyne May 24th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
Don't mind me, go right ahead (pun not intended)
“jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?”
A crime has been committed so someone needs to take the blame. As rapists are never to blame it falls on the victim to accept responsibility. That’s why everybody blames the victim too, at some level they know something terrible has happened, but they can’t quite bring themselves to blame men for their crimes against women, so the outrage gets conveniently transferred to the victims.
24 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
No. For the last time, read what I wrote above about her apology. It's like I'm talking to a brick wall here.
delphyne nails it, as usual.
25 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
Delphyne, it’s called shame, and all survivors of sexual assault carry it (myself included).
26 delphyne May 24th, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Oh shut up.
Me too lawbitch. I’m questioning why it happens. It’s just my own theory, but I think if communities were genuinely outraged about rape and supportive to victims that victims would find it easier (not easy though) to recover and not to blame ourselves. I mean if we can’t blame the rapist, it must be our fault, right? It’s the stinkiest of stinky dynamics.
27 kate May 24th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
See what I wrote above? There is plenty to go around.
Reports like these make me want to commit violent acts against men. Hit them, beat them, kill them.
Yeah, yeah, I know it solves nothing, I guess.
Sure it would, in fact, I encourage you to go this route. Please, please, please do all of those things. Go up to a man and attempt to "hit and beat" him, see what happens to you. Please God, let some woman be stupid enough to attack me.
28 De anza player May 24th, 2007 at 6:04 pm
sounds like you sure do buy in to the way the media twists a case in a girls direction…ever thought about what happened before the girl went in that roo…what she was doing…..saying….acting….perhaps when the truthful story comes out after all this dies down you will lower your chin a bit and look in the mirror…..the media is not the accurate source of info. they were not there in that room…i was….justice has been served
Don't try to reason with women, they are gay.
29 SimonJericho May 24th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
This is completely beyond the fucking pale. Insufficient evidence??? I was apparently under the mistaken impression that eyewitness accounts were still admissable in court and that even our present batch of misogynist fuckwits in the legal system included “Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by theaccused (taken directly from the California Penal Code),” in their definition of rape. Absolutely nauseating. There should be violent vigilantes for this kind of situation.
I agree! Please go that route! See what happens to you.
I don’t know why I’m so surprised, really. Even community college athletes are obviously worth far more to the community than some stupid, drunken slut, right?
Wow! We agree on something else!
After all, where would we be as a country if we let a little thing like a brutal gang rape interfere with the capacity of witless virile evolutionary events to hit leather wrapped spheres with crude phallic objects, to the adoration of thousands (okay, probably closer to dozens; this is community college, after all) of equally witless but less virile asshats with nothing to do on a Sunday afternoon? Fuck all these people.
30 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
That made no sense whatsoever.
I’ve been working on shame. Shame has a psychological function. Shame allows the victim to believe that she had control over her own life.
In my case, I suffered sexual abuse as a child.
You probably just imagined it.
I clearly understand on an intellectual level that I was in no way responsible. I *needed* to feel like I had some control over my own body, even when that control did not exist. As an adult, I’ve even thought that it was my fault for not telling. My DH called me on that and reminded me that I would have been beaten for telling the truth. He is absolutely right. I did what I had to do to survive.
Keep telling yourself that you slut. You let it happen, you probably enjoyed it, didn't you?
31 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Well, well, well. ‘De anza player’, since you were there, by all means enlighten the group. We await ‘the truthful story’ with bated breath.
Just kidding! Banned!
::sigh:: Women...
32 kanea May 24th, 2007 at 6:15 pm
re kate.“Reports like these make me want to commit violent acts against men. Hit them, beat them, kill them.
Yeah, yeah, I know it solves nothing, I guess.”
I think most sane people feel like that after reading new like this; at least a little bit. logic comes in and reminds you that you’d get arrested and it doesn’t change the fact that it happened.
Your excuse for innaction is fear of arrest? What a bunch of bullshit. You know that wouldn't shit happen to you you dumb harlot, atleast nothing from the police that is. You are such a cowardly female you can't even admit to another cowardly females how much of a cowardly female you are. Dumbass ho. Try attacking a man and then mail be a picture of his face when he is done with you. Cunt.
Let's do it!
Sylvanite May 24th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
I’m officially sick of sports, the people who play sports, and the fans of sports. I would appreciate it very much if men everywhere decided that basket weaving and other arts and crafts were worthy manly pursuits. Preferably to be pursued while sober and miles from the nearest woman.
Diss!
2 ashes May 24th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
I’m crying. It’s day like this you just hate this whole rotten world.
What, are you serious? You are fucking crying over this? Jesus Christ, be a man.
3 Amanda Marcotte May 24th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Thank god for Nifong and the immoral media! The hoopla over the Duke case has now made it quite likely that gang rape will be tacitly legal, because prosecuters will be scared to death to prosecute.
Word! Way to fuck yourselves in the ass you stupid feminist dykes. Your errant mangina slave soldier Nifong really screwed you ho's. Hah!
4 Erin May 24th, 2007 at 4:41 pm
This is one of those things where my brain just shuts off. If I began to fully grasp the disgusting implications of this situation I think I’d have an aneurism. And I’m loving that ONE quote they are using from a witness throughout all the articles. “I didn’t think of it as a rape situation.” Can we hear from one of the women who took her to the hospital? Or how about the one guy who supposedly tried to stop it.
Because sweety, ink costs money and the paper isn't going to waste it printing a bunch of feminine nonsense.
5 Kumachka May 24th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Wash’t the idea of team sports to channel male aggression so they wouldn’t run around raping and pillaging? Or was it simply to tire them out so they wouldn’t question The Man?
6 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 4:49 pm
No.
The idea of team sports is to hone the skills necessary for success in life under a paradigm of dominance and submission.
7 trailer park May 24th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
No.
I just can’t comprehend how this could possibly be seen as anything but rape.
Some adult gave the victim alcohol, illegally. Three witnesses can testify that she was semi-conscious, vomiting (unable to keep anything down), and that they had to carry her out of the house she was so drunk. They can also testify that the men were holding the door closed. Why would they have to hold the door closed if this was consensual sex? AND SHE IS UNDERAGE! How is this not a crime?? HOW? How much more evidence do they need?
8 kanea May 24th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
Thanks to your premature ejaculation over the whole Duke thing, a lot more than they have, apparently.
there aren’t enough words in the two languages I know to discribe my disgust. I really really hope that some one (perhapse this school’s women’s lib group?) will start protests at sporting events. if this was my school those players would be the one’s who have to leave.
9 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Congradulations, your school is a liberal cesspool!
Why are these guys being treated like real athletes? These guys are on a *community* college team. What’s next? We’ll let the little league team commit larceny? This has absolutely nothing to do with sports.
10 Shabnam May 24th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Okay, that is just hilarious. Give credit where credit is due.
District Attorneys are elected aren’t they? Isn’t this problematic? (I’m not American, so correct me if I’m wrong). Is Dolores Carr trying to court the votes of Dude Nation?
11 badkitty May 24th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Is that some feminist code speak? I've never heard that phrase before. It sounds gay.
Two of the women who rescued the girl have spoken to the press.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/13370961/detail.html
12 Shabnam May 24th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
I'm too lazy to read the link so I won't comment.
Or the votes of men who really hate teenage girls. Unfortunately, perhaps that is not such a small constituency.
13 Joanna May 24th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Or the votes of men who are understandably weary of other men getting railroaded on the say so of a couple of drunken ho's.
And I would bet good money that the three young women who rescued this child are now being harassed.
14 vera May 24th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
Let's hope so.
In her election campaign, Carr had to battle expectations that she would not be independent enough of the police, because her husband is on the police force.
If I had any hope left, it would go toward the possibility that she will have something more to battle in the next election: an outraged public.
This morning I sent a letter to the state attorney general, hoping that someone in that office might think an investigation is in order. I don’t know, however, if that’s the correct office to contact.
15 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:25 pm
Sending a letter, that'll get things done.
Shabnam, Dolores Carr is trying to prove that she wasn’t lying when she got elected on a platform of “my San Jose police detective husband will in no way influence my decisions as DA.” True enough; ostensibly she and the cops depart wildly from each other on this case.
Oh, and she’s trying to court the votes of Dude Nation.
16 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
There it is again!
I see Vera has already answered Shabnam’s question. Someday I will understand blogs.
17 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Za?
The Sherriff’s ofice is keeping the case open.
“Sources told CBS 5 that the Sheriff’s Office was considering a range of options from re-starting the investigation, to re-filing on new, lesser charges against the baseball players for having unlawful sex with a minor, or furnishing a minor with alcohol.”
I get the impression that the sheriff is watching and waiting for has the rapist who committed the hit/run to strike again.
18 A. May 24th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Probably not.
Okay, the really devastating quotation for me is from the article linked by bad kitty. Speaking of the victim: “When they lifted her head up, her eyes moved and she said ‘I’m sorry.’”
jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?
19 redhead May 24th, 2007 at 5:31 pm
Cause she was drunk and didn't know what the hell was going on? Everybody says that they are sorry when they are drunk. I once apologized to my carpet for throwing up on it.
badkitty, thanks for the link. The lowlight is this, from one of the gang-rapers: “This is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.” She did what - gang-raped herself when she was so drunk she was vomiting and had to be carried out of the house?
20 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
Something like that.
“When they lifted her head up, her eyes moved and she said ‘I’m sorry.’â€
I do not have the ovaries to continue reading general coverage of this bullshit anymore, but jesus tapdancing christ. This is precisely why I write this fucking blog; I keep hoping, against all reason, that some parent somewhere will read it and think “Oh! Wow. Maybe I should try to imbue my son with some sense of T & B. And while I’m at it, maybe I should become a feminist.”
What's T and B?
21 redhead May 24th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?
She’s a woman in a patriarchy. She really shouldn’t be out in public, let alone thinking she has the right to drink at a party where there are men without relegating herself to the slut class.
22 Maryam May 24th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
No. See my earlier explanation above.
“This is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.â€
Excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall.
23 delphyne May 24th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
Don't mind me, go right ahead (pun not intended)
“jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?”
A crime has been committed so someone needs to take the blame. As rapists are never to blame it falls on the victim to accept responsibility. That’s why everybody blames the victim too, at some level they know something terrible has happened, but they can’t quite bring themselves to blame men for their crimes against women, so the outrage gets conveniently transferred to the victims.
24 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
No. For the last time, read what I wrote above about her apology. It's like I'm talking to a brick wall here.
delphyne nails it, as usual.
25 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
Delphyne, it’s called shame, and all survivors of sexual assault carry it (myself included).
26 delphyne May 24th, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Oh shut up.
Me too lawbitch. I’m questioning why it happens. It’s just my own theory, but I think if communities were genuinely outraged about rape and supportive to victims that victims would find it easier (not easy though) to recover and not to blame ourselves. I mean if we can’t blame the rapist, it must be our fault, right? It’s the stinkiest of stinky dynamics.
27 kate May 24th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
See what I wrote above? There is plenty to go around.
Reports like these make me want to commit violent acts against men. Hit them, beat them, kill them.
Yeah, yeah, I know it solves nothing, I guess.
Sure it would, in fact, I encourage you to go this route. Please, please, please do all of those things. Go up to a man and attempt to "hit and beat" him, see what happens to you. Please God, let some woman be stupid enough to attack me.
28 De anza player May 24th, 2007 at 6:04 pm
sounds like you sure do buy in to the way the media twists a case in a girls direction…ever thought about what happened before the girl went in that roo…what she was doing…..saying….acting….perhaps when the truthful story comes out after all this dies down you will lower your chin a bit and look in the mirror…..the media is not the accurate source of info. they were not there in that room…i was….justice has been served
Don't try to reason with women, they are gay.
29 SimonJericho May 24th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
This is completely beyond the fucking pale. Insufficient evidence??? I was apparently under the mistaken impression that eyewitness accounts were still admissable in court and that even our present batch of misogynist fuckwits in the legal system included “Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by theaccused (taken directly from the California Penal Code),” in their definition of rape. Absolutely nauseating. There should be violent vigilantes for this kind of situation.
I agree! Please go that route! See what happens to you.
I don’t know why I’m so surprised, really. Even community college athletes are obviously worth far more to the community than some stupid, drunken slut, right?
Wow! We agree on something else!
After all, where would we be as a country if we let a little thing like a brutal gang rape interfere with the capacity of witless virile evolutionary events to hit leather wrapped spheres with crude phallic objects, to the adoration of thousands (okay, probably closer to dozens; this is community college, after all) of equally witless but less virile asshats with nothing to do on a Sunday afternoon? Fuck all these people.
30 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
That made no sense whatsoever.
I’ve been working on shame. Shame has a psychological function. Shame allows the victim to believe that she had control over her own life.
In my case, I suffered sexual abuse as a child.
You probably just imagined it.
I clearly understand on an intellectual level that I was in no way responsible. I *needed* to feel like I had some control over my own body, even when that control did not exist. As an adult, I’ve even thought that it was my fault for not telling. My DH called me on that and reminded me that I would have been beaten for telling the truth. He is absolutely right. I did what I had to do to survive.
Keep telling yourself that you slut. You let it happen, you probably enjoyed it, didn't you?
31 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Well, well, well. ‘De anza player’, since you were there, by all means enlighten the group. We await ‘the truthful story’ with bated breath.
Just kidding! Banned!
::sigh:: Women...
32 kanea May 24th, 2007 at 6:15 pm
re kate.“Reports like these make me want to commit violent acts against men. Hit them, beat them, kill them.
Yeah, yeah, I know it solves nothing, I guess.”
I think most sane people feel like that after reading new like this; at least a little bit. logic comes in and reminds you that you’d get arrested and it doesn’t change the fact that it happened.
Your excuse for innaction is fear of arrest? What a bunch of bullshit. You know that wouldn't shit happen to you you dumb harlot, atleast nothing from the police that is. You are such a cowardly female you can't even admit to another cowardly females how much of a cowardly female you are. Dumbass ho. Try attacking a man and then mail be a picture of his face when he is done with you. Cunt.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Women's greatest weakness
What I am about to say may seem obvious to most of you, but I am very out of touch with women (because I have so little regard for them) so it is quasi-news to me.
THE issue that bothers women the most is rape. Not violence against women, not abortions, not the wage gap, not anything else. Rape is a particularly important issue to Feminists (notice the capitolization, all women are atleast lowercase feminists but not all are capitol Feminists) because it is the ultimate proof of woman's inherent inferiority.
I can't go so far as to support rape, I still think it's wrong and should be punished, but I like that women need to live in fear of rape. I like that I have found an issue that the mere mention of can reduce most Feminists to tears. If you want to cause pain to a woman, make a joke about rape. I will be sure to do this more in my own life.
In some spats I had with females during the years, I wonder if they mistakingly took my belligerent attitude as being a threat of rape, which I didn't intend, as opposed to just the threat of violence, which was the effect I was going for.
In conclusion: rape is funny
THE issue that bothers women the most is rape. Not violence against women, not abortions, not the wage gap, not anything else. Rape is a particularly important issue to Feminists (notice the capitolization, all women are atleast lowercase feminists but not all are capitol Feminists) because it is the ultimate proof of woman's inherent inferiority.
I can't go so far as to support rape, I still think it's wrong and should be punished, but I like that women need to live in fear of rape. I like that I have found an issue that the mere mention of can reduce most Feminists to tears. If you want to cause pain to a woman, make a joke about rape. I will be sure to do this more in my own life.
In some spats I had with females during the years, I wonder if they mistakingly took my belligerent attitude as being a threat of rape, which I didn't intend, as opposed to just the threat of violence, which was the effect I was going for.
In conclusion: rape is funny
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
More on Mangina Asswipe Steven King
The beautiful essay that I crafted below was inspired by reading some more feminist drivel by supreme douchebag woman-lover, Stephen King. In his fucking book Insomnia there is all this feminist bullshit. Well fuck all of that. Fuck Steven King and fuck women and fuck feminism. Fuck.
You may be able to gather that the little dipshit hack fuckwad has really gotten under my skin this time so I will tell you what made me so angry.
It starts with this really minor character bitch who has got bruises all on her face from her husband. King of course can't leave it at that, the last you hear from the uppity cunt King mentions "the fading bruises of the last beating a man woud ever give her...". Are you fucking kidding me? Fuck you Steven King.
Oh yeah, I can just feel the strength of this newly empowered womyn oozing from the pages. Any woman who feels so strong and empowered can come give that shit to me and see what I do to your fucking face. Listen to me you stupid bitches, you are not my fucking equal! I will fucking kick the shit out of you if you try that "independent" shit with me.
Why does this make me so mad? Because its bullshit. I'm tired of women babbling about how independent they are while hiding behind Big Sister's skirt. If you bitches didn't have Big Sister's Mangina slave-soldiers lets see how fucking independent you are. Dumb cunts. Fuck you. If you really are strong and independent you don't have to go out advertising it. You ever see a man brag about how "independent" he is? Of course not, because all men are de facto independent whereas all you are totally dependent on us, one way or another. Stupid twats. Fuck you. You want to be equal? Well you can start by acting like a man instead of a entitled twat fraud. By yourself a gun, learn Brazilian Ju Jitsu and get yourself a high paying job. Live your life and don't give people a bunch of bullshit about how "strong" you are. You act like this and we will give you your props, there are some legitimately tough women out there (see "Snoop" from HBO's The Wire), but they are usually one's who just try to be one of the guys and they are usually embraced and respected as such. There are no legitimately strong feminist though, just a buch of uppity harpy cunts.
There is more Stephen King I could complain about but I don't feel like it right now.
You may be able to gather that the little dipshit hack fuckwad has really gotten under my skin this time so I will tell you what made me so angry.
It starts with this really minor character bitch who has got bruises all on her face from her husband. King of course can't leave it at that, the last you hear from the uppity cunt King mentions "the fading bruises of the last beating a man woud ever give her...". Are you fucking kidding me? Fuck you Steven King.
Oh yeah, I can just feel the strength of this newly empowered womyn oozing from the pages. Any woman who feels so strong and empowered can come give that shit to me and see what I do to your fucking face. Listen to me you stupid bitches, you are not my fucking equal! I will fucking kick the shit out of you if you try that "independent" shit with me.
Why does this make me so mad? Because its bullshit. I'm tired of women babbling about how independent they are while hiding behind Big Sister's skirt. If you bitches didn't have Big Sister's Mangina slave-soldiers lets see how fucking independent you are. Dumb cunts. Fuck you. If you really are strong and independent you don't have to go out advertising it. You ever see a man brag about how "independent" he is? Of course not, because all men are de facto independent whereas all you are totally dependent on us, one way or another. Stupid twats. Fuck you. You want to be equal? Well you can start by acting like a man instead of a entitled twat fraud. By yourself a gun, learn Brazilian Ju Jitsu and get yourself a high paying job. Live your life and don't give people a bunch of bullshit about how "strong" you are. You act like this and we will give you your props, there are some legitimately tough women out there (see "Snoop" from HBO's The Wire), but they are usually one's who just try to be one of the guys and they are usually embraced and respected as such. There are no legitimately strong feminist though, just a buch of uppity harpy cunts.
There is more Stephen King I could complain about but I don't feel like it right now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)