Anti-Womens Coalition

Manginas are worse

2008-12-08T05:26:00.001-08:00

I have decided that manginas are worse than Feminists. I used to believe the opposite but a recent comment on feministing has turned me towards believing that manginas are actually even more obnoxious.

Okay, here's the deal: Feministing had a post complaining about this company that was offering a set of "brands" for meat products reading "Dad" and "Son". The idea is that I guess if a father and son are cooking out that they can use the branding irons to mark which piece of steak is theirs.

Now, granted, this is an incredibly stupid idea for a product but that wasn't Feministing's problem with it. No, they found it sexist because it implied that eating meat was manly and by not having an identical mother/daughter pair of brands the makers of the product were saying that women didn't really like steak and generally preferred vegetables.

But anyway, the real problem was in the comments section where this one mangina who never shuts up about his now 2 year old daughter said something like this, "I can imagine my daughter coming home from Brazillian Ju Jitsu practice when she is 13, wiping her sweat off with her Gi and saying, 'Give me the piece that's still bleeding'"

Here are the issues I have with his statement:
1. The phrase is "still breathing" you fucking dumbass. Not "still bleeding". You say you want your meat still breathing to indicate that it is so rare, you haven't even cooked it yet. What the hell could "still bleeding" possibly mean? Frickin' idiot. Only a total pussy mangina could make a mistake like that.
2. I don't give a shit how much BJJ your whore daughter takes, my skinny, couch potato ass will still be able to kick the living shit out of her and 99.9% of all women with one hand tied behind my back. This guy clearly wants his daughter to take BJJ so she can hold her own physically with guys but that will never happen. It's bad enough we have to put up with women claiming that they are our mental equals, but now we have people claiming that they are our physical equals too.

I read a lot of Feminist writing and they all uniformilly suck, but manginas like this one piss me off the most. And also, when you think about it, Feminists by themselves have never done any actual damage. It has all been done by their mangina allies.

Insecurity of cunts

2008-09-28T02:36:00.000-07:00

Feministing had all their bitches post about things that they hated. It revealed that Feminists are more insecure than I realized. Let's go over some and see how they are all stupid cunts.

This is from Samhita's list:

9. Shops that don't carry larger than a size 8.

Why should a private business cater to your fat ass you stupid cunt?

8. Body hair removal.

What the fuck do you care if people get their body hair removed you dumb harlot?

5. Progressive men that do sexist shit.

You mean that you don't like it when liberal guys kiss your ugly ass insufficiently? Fuck you bitch.

4. The McCain/Palin ticket.

At least you mentioned McCain. You are a cunt.

3. Having my weight scrutinized by friends and family on a regular basis even though I am a grown ass woman and it is none of your business.

Maybe if you weren't such a fat ass they wouldn't worry about it so much

1. Dating.

I don't like dating either, which is why I DON'T FUCKING DO IT. Stop being a whiny cunt.

That's a wrap for Samhita, lets go on to the dumbass comentators.

Yes!!!
I hate family commenting on my weight in the guise of "are you eating healthy at school? are you going to take a dance class?" aka "you look fat" and i get the same crap from my doctor, "you're healthy, but..."
Posted by Molly September 24, 2008 11:40 AM

Molly, it sounds like you are a fat ho.

About the weight issue--I hate it when I complain about my weight and my S.O. says "well I think you look beautiful." I understand he is trying to be sweet, but who the f cares what he thinks? It's not about what he thinks of me...it's how I feel about myself. When will men realize it's NOT ALWAYS ABOUT THEM!?
Posted by Bee September 24, 2008 2:24 PM

Holy shit.

A smug asshole telling me, "don't you get it? you will ALWAYS be judged by the way you look".

Posted by Chartreus September 24, 2008 9:51 PM

That guy is the man.

5. The once a month weigh in over the phone. Mom or Dad: "How's your health? Have you put on any weight?" Me: "I'm 5 feet 2 inches and I weigh about 125 pounds, which is average! Why do you keep asking?" Mom or Dad: "Hmmm, be careful. Eat properly" Eh?!

125 at 5'2 is not average you fat ho bag.

10. Two words: "women's issues"
Posted by Courtney - September 18, 2008, at 04:35PM in Sexism

You may just be the biggest crybaby whore to ever live. Feminists are the ones who created "women's issues". You are a total cunt.

.4. Feeling ugly without makeup.

You are probably just as ugly with it.

7. Feeling too intimidated to confront certain people on their oppressive attitudes or actions

Haha, not so tough when you aren't online are you? Dumb bitch.

10. People who take non-stranger rapes less seriously.
Posted by MHeald September 18, 2008 5:04 PM

You mean, the entire planet?

7) "Should you really eat that? Aren't you afraid your husband won't love you if you get fat?"8) "Women don't think, they just feel." 9) "Why are you so angry? Don't you think that's unfeminine?"10) "Women are like children, and need to be treated accordingly."
Posted by JetGirl70 September 18, 2008 5:11 PM

Gimme a break, nobody has ever said any of those things to you.

And to think some men actually think girls/women like being whistled at!?
Posted by fourthwave September 18, 2008 5:31 PM

They do, but that isn't why we do it. We don't give a fuck what you do or don't like.

1. being told to have more of a sense of humor when i don't laugh at degrading jokes2. being treated like a novelty because of identifying as feminist3. people thinking me crossing my legs is an invitation to ask about my sexuality4. not being able to order a drink because the name is disgusting5. having to defend simple ideas like "rape is bad" or "racism exists"6. having privilege and not knowing what to do about it7. the "men's interest" and "women's interest" periodical sections in bookstores8. movie posters 9. having liberalism attributed to being young and wanting to be "different"10. being pressured to like sports or at least pretend like i like sports
Posted by Rob.William September 18, 2008 5:32 PM

Okay, Feministing, I love your site but please ban these manginas. They are pissing me the fuck off.

As for this guy, he is obviously both a douche and a mangina, but is he also a faggot? I can't tell from this post, I need more information.

5. Prank callers on the rape-crisis hotline
Posted by Katie September 18, 2008 5:36 PM

Okay, that's pretty bad.

Those Glade Plug-Ins ads.
Posted by BrittneyBush September 18, 2008 5:51 PM

This chick fucking rules, that was actually the only item on her list. Those adds are really annoying.

Being programmed to think I will never be good in math or science, because I am a girl.
Posted by Lelah September 18, 2008 6:22 PM

That statement should simply read "being programmed to never be good in math or science, because I am a girl"

i hate it when i'm having a conversation with a man i've recently met... Feminism comes up, i mention my passion for it, politely ask his views about the topic and he says:
"I'm a MAN, why would i be a feminist/why should i care about feminism/why should i care about sexism?".
Posted by iheartchai September 18, 2008 6:29 PM

Just a suggestion, don't EVER ask a man what he thinks about feminism.

6. Being told I'm acting embarrassingly and combatively after I protest when, in a restaurant, one male friend refers to some husband's rape of his wife in a movie as "not really rape, because you could tell she kind of enjoyed it." Or when, in another restaurant, another male friend likened his sister to "a Muslim woman" for her subservience in relationships.

How dare he be politically incorrect. Fuck you bitch.

8. Women not winning enough shit! Like book deals, record contracts, presidencies and Pulitzers!

Women win way too much shit that they don't deserve. Women are incompetant and worthless.

9. When at work (I'm a reporter), avoiding calling the female lawyers on cases because I know pretty well that they're probably associates or in any case not lead counsel.
Posted by everybodyever September 18, 2008 6:33 PM

See, even you secretly know that women are incompetent and worthless.

3. women being devalued, denigrated, sexualized,insulted, etc., in movies. Not every female role has to revolve around men or titillating men!

Yes they do

5. women who feel threatened by other women, and the moments of weakness when I do as well.

Haha.
Posted by funkygroove September 18, 2008 6:57 PM

9. People who complain about the movie not being exactly like the book.
Posted by Toni September 18, 2008 7:04 PM

That one's pretty funny too. I do that all the time though.

5. Feeling too shy or outgunned to call people on their racist, sexist bullshit when I hear it. As if I'm the one with something to hide.
Posted by AnnaBella September 18, 2008 7:08 PM

You are. The last thing you need is your family and friends figuring out that you are a feminist cunt.

As a guy who recently learned that I has been far more sexist than I'd like to live with and has decided to change I'd just like say:
1. I have called some of my friends and peers "honey" or "sweetie" before. I'm sorry, I really am, some of my friends and I do still refer to each other like this but it is was sexist of me to assume others wouldn't find it patronizing. 2. I have made gay jokes, I used to think it was just a simple joke, luckily a friends of mine who is a gay student representative at my university helped enlighten me.3. I am still afraid to call myself a feminist, and I hate that.
and as for something that I could do without, being told I am not a feminist because I am a straight, white male and that I only say that for attention. It couldn't at all be because I respect my mother, sister and close friends and feel they deserve fair and equal treatment, no not at all.
Posted by cdstacker September 18, 2008 7:55 PM

Please kill yourself.

Re: "Smile." Oooh, that one makes me absolutely livid. The last guy who said that to me made me so incoherently angry that I shouted "I want to shoot you in your motherfucking face!!!1" Uhh... what an odd thing for me to say to someone. I'm not a violent person and have never held a gun, but "smile" really, really gets to me in a way that not many other things do.
I am not a decoration in a man's landscape.
Posted by lal46 September 18, 2008 11:59 PM

Yes you are, and that's all you are. Cunt.

1). Being told that feminists are just interested in sex.2). Being told I can't be a feminist as a man.3). Being distrusted because I'm male.4). Sexual assault, sexual harassment, patriarchy, etc.5). Feeling like I need to prove that not ALL men are sexist, chauvinist, potential rapists, etc.6). Having an extremely enlightened female friend say that I exhibit characteristics of 'progressive white male syndrome' (whatever the hell that is).7). Any term of endearment from any stranger.8). Leftwing sanctimony: Enough with 'making the world for a better place for our children' spiel; if you want to make the world a better place for your children, don't f*$kn' have any! 7 Billion people is enough!9). People expecting me to know everything because of my gender or ethnicity.10). Not being able to find enough feminist friends (of either/any gender) in supposedly progressive Seattle.
Posted by Devin September 19, 2008 12:34 AM

Kill yourself.

My Top Ten (Teen) Dating:1. Guys who think it’s “cute” that I’m “causey.” Or “interesting” that I am a feminist.2. Guys who lose interest when they discover that I would never want biological children, and that if I got pregnant would put the child up for adoption or force the father to take complete custody. I just hate having guys think that it’s wrong or weird--I’M SEVENTEEN!!! OF COURSE I DON’T WANT BABIES. I also feel that it is unfair that they think I am “cold” for wanting to put a career above settling down and having a family. Double standard much... And I think they are a bigger freak for making that a disqualification at our young age.3. Somehow managing to be a slut simply because I know more about sex than my guy friends. Which is kind of funny in and of itself because 1. I am a virgin, and 2. I am a virgin because I don’t want any of the nasty diseases that are going around.4. Being called “easy” for any of the following:Kissing on the first date. REALLY PEOPLE! COME ON! It’s a kiss. GET OVER IT!Having the audacity to ask the boys out.Being a flirt. I like to flirt. That means nothing besides I like to flirt.The mentality that doing anything makes me easy. The term itself makes it sound like anyone and everyone has access to my body. Somehow that smacks of rape culture. My body not being mine, but instead public property--the assumption that anyone can touch it. It just makes me really angry. And to quote the Hulk--you won’t like me when I’m angry.I am sick of guys calling girls sluts for being sexually active and patting their guy friends on the back for their sexual exploits.I am tired of guys saying I am “kinky” because I enjoy an intelligent conversation about sex and will discuss any form, style, orientation, choice, disease, etc. the same way I might discuss the latest releases at a theater. Just because I am open with a discussion on it does not mean that I am doing. Nor should we condemn those who chose to do it. I am just really tired of people being assumptive arseholes.I am sick of getting messages that guys thought they sent to their friends about me that prove they are just yet another jerkface. I am even sick of those messages that I don’t mistakenly recieve, but know they exist. I am sick that guys feel they have the right to talk about another HUMAN that way. I am sick of guys bragging about how they might “get somewhere with this one.”5. Guys who tell me that I am hot but not worth dating. Because I am:Too intimidating.Too independent. It just wouldn’t work.I’m fun, but I’m not girlfriend material.I’m a little too “easy.” For kissing too soon. I would love to hear that one in a Sleeping Beauty context. She didn’t even talk to the guy or agree to a scam, and she got kissed. Oh, right. Girls can’t initiate it. Because that is being “forward.”6. The fact that I am strong and independent and don’t need a boyfriend to complete me and make me feel better about myself making me undateable. Also the fact that I have an ego, am self-assured, and know that I am gorgeous and intelligent and sexy working against me. I like my confidence. If you don’t shove it. I also don’t like being told I am beautiful by guys too often--I want people to like me because I am fun, have a great sense of humor, and am intelligent--not because there is an eleven inch difference between my bust and my waist.7. Shallow guys. Especially ugly shallow guys. Especially nerdy ugly shallow guys.8. Guys who think that because I was flirting with them I am automatically going to say yes to a date.9. Creepy old men stalkers. Especially creepy old men stalkers who want a relationship and we could “work out” the fact that I have parents. And that I am a minor. Plus that they ignore that I have told them I am uninterested because they are too old because I am apparently I am young and “don’t know what I want,” and will realize I want a “real man” and want to date them. Puke now.10. The inability to find a guy who can withstand the stregnth of my personality and not be patronizing about it.
Posted by Shopgirl152 September 19, 2008 12:42 AM

Okay, listen to me girl, you got problems. That's all I'm gonna say.

6. My Mom giving my husband the bigger plate of food( he is a man so he needs to eat more).
Posted by penny rose September 19, 2008 1:15 AM

Or maybe because he's FUCKING BIGGER THAN YOU? Maybe she knows that he FUCKING EATS MORE THAN YOU DO?

4. Having to explain to otherwise reasonably feminist people that it's not okay to suggest that rape victims bring it on themselves by comparing a woman who gets raped because she was alone and/or provocatively dressed to a man who gets mugged because he walked in a bad neighbourhood.

It's the exact same thing

5. Not being able to feel safe when walking alone in the dark, even when it's still early and I'm walking along busy main roads.

I think it's funny
Posted by wavesandmoon September 19, 2008 2:08 AM

There's more of this endless crap, but that's enough for right now

The Lie of Black Feminism

2008-07-07T13:31:00.000-07:00

Question: Is Feminism just for snooty white women or is it also for "women of color", particularly black women?

Answer: It is just for white women.

but wait a minute, aren't there black Feminists?

No. No, there are not.

We saw this in the Democratic primary. ALL white Feminists supported Hillary Clinton, who is seen by them as a Feminist icon. Did black women follow suit? No, of course they didn't, they supported Obama and frequently attacked Hillary supporters as entitled white girls who just didn't get it.

This is because whereas white Feminists see themselves first and foremost as women, black Feminists see themselves first and foremost as black. That means that it is impossible for a black woman to ever be a true Feminist, which means that Feminism really is exclusively for bitchy white women.

Billy Jean King sucks

2008-05-04T07:20:00.000-07:00

This isn't original, for an MRA to be mocking the whole Billie Jean King v Bobby Riggs match but I'm doing it anyway.

I think that Billie Jean King was/is a feminist cunt. A lot of people seem to believe she is a lezzie but as far as I know she is actually bi-sexual, which is even more gross.

Bobby Riggs really let us all down by losing the match. I want you to keep something in mind, this match took place in the 70's, so the social climate was totally different than today. If this match took place today everybody would be like: so? Even the hardcore feminist bitches probably wouldn't be able to do anymore than just fake some interests.

The 70's was the peak of the women's movement. The United States was an egiltarian country before the arrival of the Matriarchy in the 70's. Men were noticing feminism and becoming annoyed by it but at the end of the day it was still a bad joke to them. It was no joke to women though and a Bobby Riggs victory would have been a true slap in their face. It wouldn't have made any difference in the long run but it would have been funny.

The King-Riggs match is almost symbolic of the whole feminist movement. Men (Riggs) underestimated the seriousness of these uppity cunts (King) and have ended up losing at something we are exponitially better in. An in shape Bobby Riggs beats King 100 out of 100 times, even at age 55, but Riggs underestimated her and was caught off guard. Men beat women at everything 100 out of 100 times if we are on equal footing but when we get complacent women can sneak in a victory over us. That is how feminism succeeded, it caught us flat footed. Things are changing though. They are changing slowly, but changing nontheless.

Heavyweights 6 through 10

2008-04-22T23:51:00.000-07:00

6. Jack Johnson: at ~6'1 and 208lbs he would be small by today's standards but was so fast and skilled that I don't see his lack of size hurting him too bad, or at all actually. Great fighter but since fighters back then basically sucked he had pretty weak opposition. He reminds me a lot of a bigger, stronger and faster version of Jersey Joe Walcott who gave an aged Joe Louis fits and had Rocky Marciano beat until getting clobbered by a huge right in the 13th round (which was the same round that Louis caught him in as well, 13 was definately an unlucky number for Jersey Joe).

7. Lennox Lewis: 6'5 240lbs. Big and very strong with crushing power in his right hand. Didn't really get the respect he was due until the Holyfield fights and the Holyfield he beat was past his prime but Lewis is still an all time great fighter. Great longevity at the top.

8. Sonny Liston: 6'0 1/2 212lbs. Big, scary, huge fists, long reach and a great jab, this guy absolutely cleaned out the division in the late 50's early 60's and punctuated his run with two crushing 1st round kayo's of Floyd Patterson.

9. Jack Dempsey: 6'1 187lbs. I really didn't want to put a guy this small and with such shitty comp on the list but I don't think this is a ridiculous rank for him. He had the ability to fight in a lot of different styles and beat some good big guys in Jess Willard and Angel Firpo in addition to absolutely destroying every white fighter in the division on his way up.

10. Joe Frazier: 5'11 205lbs. It's the loss to Foreman that really hurts his legacy but his other accomplishments are so great that he needs to be on this list. Foreman was a terrible match up for him. The other guys on this list could have all found a way to beat Foreman (I'm not saying they would, but it's possible), but if Frazier fought Foreman 100 times he would get knocked out within the first 3 rounds 100 times. Still a hell of a fighter though.

Rocky (Marciano) does not make this list as a basically view him as a less effective version of Smokin' Joe. I love the Rock, but I don't see him in the top 10.

p.s.: I'm pretty confident in having picked the 10 best heavyweights but I am not confident at all about the order I have put them in.

"Girl Power" feminism

2008-04-22T23:18:00.001-07:00

anyway, sorry this is late, let's talk about "girl power"

Girl Power feminism takes on the whole feminist ideal of "empowerment" but instead of adopting masculine values they keep up and sometimes even hype of the femininity. It is kind of a wierd contrast but it exists in about 70 percent of women in the west.

Girl Power feminists will almost always deny being feminists, they are usually in the the "I'm not a feminist, but..." camp. While Girl Power feminists do not necessarily dress and act like sluts, they usually do (which is good!) and they also see their sexuality as part of their power. Men are generally viewed as Neandrathals who more or less think exclusively with their dicks so they can be manipulated with sex, and most Girl Power feminists think that women are actually more intelligent than men to begin with.

Whereas a real Feminist spends all her time coming up with imaginary grievances against an imaginary Patriarchy that oppresses them, Girl Power feminists recognize the Matriarchy and use it to cash in. But they do not see the Matriarchy as having been created and upheld by mangina slave soldiers but rather by other "kick butt" women like themselves. They are delusional, and in several ways.

These Girl Power feminists think that Charlie's Angels and Alias are real life. What I mean is that they think young, nominally attractive* girls can beat the living shit out of several NFL sized brutes at the same time, let alone an average guy. Have you ever seen a girl play fighting with her boyfriend? Well let me clue you in on something that may shock you: when you see a girl play fighting with a guy, she doesn't know that he isn't trying.

I know how ridiculous that sounds but it is the truth. When you see a girl "beat up" her boyfriend she thinks that she just beat him up for real. Of course, she was "going easy on him" as well so you can imagine how bad the poor guy would have been thrashed had she actually been trying! Girls/women are totally clueless as to how physically weak they are.

My brothers girlfriend wanted to fight me once (in a friendly match, not to hurt me or anything) and I said I was willing to but told her she stood no chance because she couldn't even hang with my brother. She answered that she regularly beat my brother up in their play fights. I said, yeah, because he was not trying at all. She answered that yes he was. I was in disbelief that anyone could be so out of touch with reality so I told her, go ask him if he was trying. She asked him and was gueniunely shocked when he responded that ofcourse he wasn't trying to do anything except not hurt her.

This was not a uniquely dumb girl (she was actually unusually smart for a girl), all Kick Butt, Girl Power feminists are like this. Girl Power feminists genuinely believe themselves to be superior to guys, real Feminists make up excuses as to why they appear to be inferior. Real Feminists are much more in touch with reality and much less obnoxious.

in conclusion, all women are awful.

*none of the Charlie's Angels were actually hot. Lucy Lui: no. Cameron Diaz: God no. Drew Barrymore: nope, although she was pretty fuckin' fine in her cameo in Batman Forever. Jennifer Garner from Alias is okay, but nothing to write home about.

Californication

2008-04-04T13:47:00.000-07:00

anybody ever see this Showtime series called "Californication"

It stars David Duchovny playing the man he obviously wishes he was: a wiseass, womanizing writer. Sort of a dehydrated, grown up Holden Caufield on steroids. The guy is a jerk on the surface but also deep down loves the women in his life and all women in general. He is not a macho brute but at the same time is willing to throw down, particularly if the one of the women he loves are attacked or insulted. He's smart, witty, handsome (hell he's played by David Duchovny, don't get much more handsome than that, and I know that sounds gay) and masculine but in a "loveable", overgrown teenager way. And he is filthy rich, his fortune coming from his career as a brilliant writer. In short: he is the kind of guy that virtually every woman who isn't either a Feminist or a lezzie fantasizes about as their imaginary perfect guy.

The last part isn't meant to be an attack on woman but rather on Duchovny who obviously has based his whole fantasy alter ego on being the "perfect man" according to the standards of entitled bitchy women. But that is neither here nor there, I don't really give a shit about Duchovny's pathetic self image but I do give a shit about the "girl power" feminism that the show promotes.

First let me comment on the show, it is okay, not great, but okay. That said, on to the feminism of the show.

As I have explained in so many words before there are two main brands of feminism:

1. Strait feminism: these include everything from NOW to SCUM and make up over 25 percent of all Western women

2. Girl Power "kick butt" post-modern feminism: This category takes up about 70 percent of all women, and is much, much worse.

I have to go but will talk more about all of this later

Top 10 Heavyweights

2008-01-31T13:02:00.000-08:00

Hear is my opinion of the 10 best heavyweights to ever fight in boxing. Modern boxing begain in 1892 and continues to the present.

1. Muhammed Ali (6'3 210lbs.): This guy could do it all. His most impressive accomplishments came long after his prime had ended. He was not immortal, nobody is, but he was the best of all time. He had the style to win any kind of fight.

2. Joe Louis (6'1.5 200lbs.): at 200lbs he might seem a little small by todays standards but size, while a factor, is grotesquly overrated. In the heavyweight division size is only an advantage to a point, then it becomes a detriment. Louis was an excellent technician and had brutal power with amazingly quick hands. I'd take Ali to beat him but if anybody could upset "The Greatest" it's him.

3. George Foreman (6'3.5 225lbs.): Probably the most physically impressive fighter ever. This guy was just a beast. He absolutely destroyed some great fighters. In his first career he just didn't have the maturity and confidence to get it done. Very few people rank him this high but I believe that while his accomplishments are that great (relatively speaking) that at his peak he really was that good of a fighter.

4. Mike Tyson (5'11 218lbs.): In his prime he was something to behold, sort of a hybrid of Joe Louis and Joe Frazier. He destroyed very big, very strong fighters before he began his rather rapid collapse. He probably could have been the greatest heavyweight ever but like Foreman, mental issues prevented him from achieving his full potential.

5. Evander Holyfield (6'2 215lbs): If he and Mike had met in their respective primes I don't think Holyfield would have won, but he might have. A great fighter who almost undoubtably used steroids to muscle up. Not overwhelmingly powerful but tough and with no glaring weaknesses.

I'll post 6-10 later, don't feel like it now

Feminist lays down the law

2008-01-31T12:21:00.000-08:00

Here is a comment from an uppity feminist bitch responding to some article about how Feminists should deal with MRA's or something. Since she is a woman, she has to go on endlessly but I did kind of like her comment/essay and it provides an interesting look into Feminist inspired paranoia and psychosis. She does make at least one very good point. Like I said, I'm starting to respect Feminists a little more after seeing "What Women Want" and am now more into general anti-womanism then true anti-feminism. Anyway, here is the ho's pseudo article thingy:

Could you be friends with someone who looked on you as less than human? No, because even if you thought you were friends with him, he wouldnâ€™t think of you as a friend: you can only be friends with your equals, and an anti-feminist man does not think of women as equals.
You said it, Jes.
This is why I cannot even “be friends with” or at this point, even tolerate the RL company of conservative guys, even the ones I used to think of as friends for all my past life as a conservative anti-feminist woman.

I've never trusted supposed female "anti feminists". There are very few women who aren't feminists. It doesn't take much to turn a modern woman into a Feminist.

And why I won’t date the meo-lib sexist guys, even the “nice” ones I run into who I can at least talk with, after I find out that they think that feminism is as bad as male chauvinism, that women aren’t really discriminated against in the workplace, that everything really *is* equal and we should just stop talking about the past or “exaggerating” the problems we face because most guys aren’t like that and my experiences of decades of sexism at school, at home, at work and out and about are invalid, why I am resolutely and almost certainly permanently single.

Sounds like a future dyke to me. She is correct about modern liberal guys. First of all, all political liberals suck. Second of all while modern "nice guys" are huge mangina woman lovers they are not man hating Feminists, and are not sympathetic with man-hating feminism. They find it threatening. It is unsurprising that a man-hater cannot find a man. Were I interested in relationships with women myself I would have to drop my woman-hating. People don't want to be in a relationship with somebody who hates their sex.

Because how can I *engage* with (much less be engaged *to*) someone who does not consider me to be a full person?

::buzzer sound:: You got it all wrong missy. I talk to guys of all walks of life all the time and I can guarantee you that very, very few men really consider women less than them. Sure on some basic level they know that men are superior but they respect women and like to see them accomplish things and show men up. They criticize chauvinists (like me) for being "insecure". Most men are guenuine woman lovers who only really consider themselves superior to women in terms of physical size and strength. I wish this wasn't the truth but it is. It isn't my opinion, it is a fact.

Who actually *says* and argues and thinks it’s reasonable to - as so many conservative intellectuals do, and have said so *in my presence* - to believe that “women have less being” than men, and engage in all kinds of pretzel-logic sophistry to explain why they’re not really bigots, it’s just that women aren’t as good as men

Alright, this I like. This bitch is doing something even 95% of men can't do: she is calling a spade a spade and saying, "no more bullshit". This chick does not tolerate double talk. She is no bullshit, just business. I respect that.

- or we’re good in “different” ways, so it’s fine to shove us out of the spheres we try to enter if we’re too stupid to know our place, ‘equal but separate,” doncha know–

Yeah, I hear that. This whole "women belong at home" thing is baloney. Some women would be happy with that kinda life but some women are as driven as some men and they got every right to go out there and compete. If they start bitching about "opression" or talking about how "independent" and "equal" they are then they deserve a smack across the face. Nobody wants to hear that shit. But if they get the job done they deserve respect, and they will get it.

If I know that a man thinks of me as some cross between a servo-droid, a collie dog and a piece of fudge, how can I discuss anything with him except on the most superficial level? Everything he says is tainted with that “yes but you belong segregated, your value is between your legs, nothing you say means as much as the dumbest XY git’s beery drivelings” - and most of them do, as evidenced by the belief that I should be complimented when told that “you’re not like most girls, wow, you’re almost as good as a man at X!”

That is not at all how most guys think. Even I don't think about women in nearly so condescending a fashion. Let's say you fix something and I man says "wow, most girls can't do that", its because in his experience most girls can't fix shit and he is impressed that you have blown his stereotype. Stereotypes aren't based on nothing.

The only way to be treated as person at all is to unsex yourself, like Lady Macbeth

In college my mom wrote a paper about how Lady MacBeth was a great feminist and a true heroine who was trying to get ahead in a patriarchal time. Her professor gave her an F and said it was the worst paper he ever read.

- and that is a very limited and impermanent sort of state, where (as happens to me regularly) the “chivalrous” guys, many of them vets, will apologize for even mentioning, oh, Korean bargirls and massages in Thailand, if they happen to be talking “guy stuff” together without realizing I was in earshot. Because I present as somewhere between “not-woman” and “good girl” (I fix computers, but I’m not very “butch” looking), they feel ashamed for sullying/insulting me with the consciousness that I’m one of those disgusting-but-yummy She-Things, as if I were non-white or gay and heard them talking about “those ___s” and they hastened to assure me that “you’re not like the rest of them”.

Well, she does have a point but she is reading too much in to it. If they are saying overtly sexist stuff that is one thing but if they are just talking about chicks they banged then apologizing is just the gentlemenly thing to do cause they understand you might be uncomfortable hearing that shit. Girls talk about guys the same way so you really are off base. It isn't the same thing as racism.

And that’s as good as it’s going to get, and better than the usual. The women who present as femmy, and worse yet are openly sexual, talking about their boyfriends or ex-husbands or movie-star fantasy boytoys in the typical Cosmo style, get treated like shit, put down constantly as stupid, as well as slutty/predatory, and having to hear coarse male fantasies directed at them (”all in good fun”), everywhere I’ve worked. And they eat that shit and smile and come back for more, because they’re not feminists, and they don’t know any other way to be.

Good point. They probably like it though. And I guarantee you those kind of women are far and away the most uppity. I hate bitches like that (i.e. almost all women). I'd rather work with a bitter dyke like you.

Maybe - if you excise *all* discussion of anything that pertains to half the human race’s interactions with the other half, yes the male chauvinists make some good points about something once in a while. Nothing says that somone can’t be sexist pig and a good meteorologist, frex.
But why would I, or any woman, want to be around that voluntarily, and obliged to pretend to be happy and content with it? Constantly ignoring piles of steaming elephant dung gets old very quickly, and biting one’s tongue because one is not allowed to point out that there is an elephant in the living room leaving turds everywhere leaves one with a very sore tongue very fast.

I thought that part was pretty weak.

For the Ladies: How to Attract a Guy

2008-01-20T20:58:00.001-08:00

MRA's are often just bitter men who have flopped at relationships and place their failures at the feet of women. One frequent complaint they will make is that Western women ignore "nice guys" like them and instead go with total jerks. On that I have two points:
1. It is a mostly a myth
2. If you really were a "nice guy" you wouldn't blame women for the fact that you haven't been able to find one. This complaint is a contradiction within itself.

Anywayz... I was thinking about this subject so I decided to look up advice on the internet for men looking to attract girls and for girls looking to attract guys. The advice for guys was pretty gay, often self contradictory and just not really accurate but the advice for girls was absolutely pitiful. The advice to girls is absolutely all over the place: act stupid, act smart, be slutty, be un-slutty, be nice, be mean, be confident, act helpless, be a flirt, be shy, etc.

Enough is enough. If you are a girl trying to figure out how to attract a guy there is only ONE thing you can do. And it is none of the above, none are even close. You have a crush on a guy who doesn't even notice you? This is what you can do:

nothing.

That's right, nothing. If a guy is not feeling you there is absolutely nothing you can do to change that. Now if he is a gueniunely nice guy and he isn't out of your league then you can still get him by becoming friends with him and then maybe you can get him to develop an interest in you over time, but if you think there is a way you can dress, or act, or talk that will get an otherwise uninterested guy to fall for you... well, that isn't going to happen.

There, I saved you a lot of wasted time and aggravation. No need to thank me, charity is it's own reward.

What Women Cunt

2008-01-13T17:47:00.000-08:00

This hilarious title was a play on the title of the Mel Gibson movie "What Women Want".

I didn't get to see the whole thing which was unfortunate cause it really wasn't that bad. At least the parts that I saw that is. It's about this sexist guy (Gibson) who somehow develops telepathy but can only read the thoughts of women. Now even I think that would be a cool ass power to have. If for no other reason than you could tell if chicks were in to you or not. But I digresss...

Anyway, I thought the movie was going to be feminist propaganda but it really wasn't. Instead it was just woman propaganda, which I have decided is much more offensive. I have redone the heiarchy of people in the following order:

Masculinists>Woman lovers>Man lovers>Feminists>Manginas>Women

Women are so gay it is not even funny. Atleast Feminists are upfront about where they are at and aren't such hypocritical pieces of dog shit. Feminists tend to be angry and delusional but relatively rational by woman standards. Plain women on the other hand just suck. They think they are so cool. Let's say you get in a (verbal) fight with a Feminist; chances are she won't threaten you with violence and she won't restort to shaming language as quick as do other women. Here is a typical verbal fight with a true feminist:

Me: women are gay
Feminist: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Me: Men make more money than women because we are smarter
Feminist: blah blah blah blah blah
Me: Most rapes are imaginary
Feminist: blah blah blah
Me: Hm... I never thought of it that way, thank you for this enlightening debate
Feminist: blah

Here on the other hand is a fight with a plain woman:

Me: women are gay
Woman: What?! Women are the shit! Women are so great! I will kick your ass!
Me: Men make more money than women because we are smarter
Woman: You are just a little boy! You are not a real man! You probably have a small dick! You are ugly! You can't get laid! You are gay!
Me: oh brother...
::by this point the woman will have gone into the emotional overload stage where she will just endlessly repeating the same insults/threats over and over::
Me: this is stupid ::I walk away::
::the woman keeps going on like the energinizer bunny, either oblivious or indifferent to the fact that I am no longer in her presence and cannot hear her blabbering. After she calms down she starts crying. Why the hell are women always crying?::

Attacking the Manginas

2007-12-25T14:35:00.000-08:00

It's hard being a Masculinist, ya know? You got so many groups of enemies: women, other MRA's who are total idiots, woman lovers (most men fit this category) and hardcore Manginas. Woman lovers are best just ignored and idiot MRA's should only be occasionally taken to task. But the Manginas are tricky: on one hand, they are gay as shit... but on the other hand, they are still men so they are not the real enemy. In fact, you could make the case that Manginas are the Matriarchy's biggest victims.

That said, they can't be ignored and I am going to have to engage in some mangina bashing now, but I will preface my comments by saying that women are evil and worthless and are the true villians.

Aight, here's the deal. On Feministing there was this article about some ho who was sexually assaulted in a bar. What makes this different from the typical sexual assault is that the other guys in the bar either cheered on the act or ignored it. Supposedly this proves that women are opressed or that all men are rapist or that... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is supposed to prove but you get the idea. Here are select mangina comments in bold:

Hmm... I like to think that I'd do something in that situation, but I have never really been there myself. Some kid did pull a pocketknife on me in elementary school. As I recall I laughed it off and walked away; but that was just some kid on the schoolyard that I knew, not a stranger in a bar.
Closest is when a woman I go to school with caught up to me outside the train after having some guy grope her and follow her off the car (we were all going to a field trip that day, just recently). It is the only time I've made a serious and sincere offer to beat somebody, which in retrospect I'm not too proud of.
The guy did have a knife in this case, and that does change things... but as pointed out, it is a bar with plenty of heavy things around to swing about. I actually know a bit about defending against a knife and how to swing heavy things about to do some damage, but it's all in the head.
What I guess I'm trying to say is it's not something you know how you're going to react to until you're in the situation. Sitting back and laughing... that is something I can say for sure I wouldn't do.
Posted by: Matthew

Wow, what a flaming mangina. You threatened to beat another guy up on the say so of a woman? What a huge douche you are. He is now saying he isn't "proud" of his gayness but I suspect he probably is but just knew that such talk would not be well taken by the woman posters. Posts like this make me actually feel bad for feminists because they have to tolerate patronizing jackasses like this clown.

I've been in a situation similar to this before (though not with a knife as a potential weapon), and my experience was that if you at least challenge or confront the attacker, then other men will normally follow, or at least back you up if you are genuinely trying to stop this type of situation.
For all of them to just sit there and (presumably) keep drinking their beer without doing or say anything doesn't suggest a lot to me other than the fact they just didn't give a shit.
Posted by: Al

Give this mangina props for his straight shooting approach. It is correct and he is at least implying that the other men in the bar did the right thing by not coming to the woman's aid. Remember, never side with a woman over a man! That's the rule.

"So, there is this lockerroom trick where you get a guys underwear off of him without taking his pants off. It is not a sexual thing at all. Rough, humilating hazing, yes. Sexual, no. It just looked like this might be like that. If in the main article, she wouldn't even talk to the guy afterward, then not a friendly thing."
Perhaps you are missing the point that even male on male, unwanted contact could be legally considered battery. Even the threat of contact would be assault. Boys injuring or even killing another playing "pro wrestler" at home is also not considered a joke.
Maybe you would understand how being interested in a woman's panties (ie opposite gender) or removing them at knifepoint, makes it sexual. A sexual assault. This will be aided by her statement and testimony. I hope she makes it that far.
Yeah, I guess it was unfriendly. Hence the arrests and charges. The police seem to believe her, even if some men here do not. I really hope your daughters never have "jokey" "friends" like these. I have a daughter. I would track them down and kill them.
Posted by: A male

This guy is such a mangina he is actually posting under the name "a male". What a loser. He is also openly admitting he would side with his daughters over a man who rapes them. Not acceptable. If my sister ever got raped she would know better than to come to me for help because I know that most rapes are imaginary and that she is just trying to frame an innocent man. It is pathetic how willing men are to sell out other men for the benifit of women.

I'm a bartender, and the bar I work at can be pretty rough and tumble, and you know, I simply cannot believe that this woman would simply sit back and watch an assault happen. Like other posters have said, it is her JOB to keep order in the bar, and that's why tough feminist chicks like myself seem to be best for the job. At the very least she should have called the police, while telling the attackers that's what she was doing. In my experience, sometimes all you need to do to calm people down is pick up the damn phone. As for having to deal with those customers again, that kind of behavior is absolutely grounds for being 86'd for life. The bartender is the figure of authority in the bar, and usually people listen to me no matter how heated they are. And if they don't, and I don't have a bouncer in, I call the police. It works every time.

I'm disgusted.
Posted by: Alexandra

Tough feminist chicks like herself? Jesus, what a bunch of bullshit. Yeah it takes a lot of balls to call the police or the bouncer. What a dumb ass ho.

Men don't help women because they just don't give a shit about women. The guys here who are trying to make it seem like a joke---88 or whomever---would probably be right there, cheering or blaming if it happened in front of them, unless it was their 'property.' Guys care what other guys think about them. They don't give a shit about women at all.
Posted by: ginmar

The triumphant return of ginmar! Seriously, this chick must have even less of a life I do since she seems to make about 100 posts a day each on about 50 different blogs. As for her point: if only it were so, Ginny. If only it were so.

Been away for awhile, being hit by a car and breaking your neck doesn't leave you up for being online, but, I have to comment here on a few things.
First, a whole article is rarely posted to this blog, BUT the link to the whole article ALWAYS is, if you want to read, go and read it.
Second, sexual assault is not funny when it is committed by a man against a woman, man against a man, woman against a woman, or woman against a man. If this had happened to a man, I would be the first one to stand up and say that it was fucked up.
I have a male friend who was raped by a woman. He is too ashamed to tell anyone but me for fear of being made fun of and that makes me sad. No one deserves that.
Posted by: SassyGirl

A woman cannot rape a man. Your friend is a lying sack of shit who was probably a woman in a past life.

Sorry the last two posts weren't manginas, I can never stay on topic. Feministing really needs to ban male posters, they are either ultra mangina's or idiots who are always like, "men get raped too!" as if anyone didn't know that. One problem with anti-feminism is that a lot of anti feminists have no real understanding of the ideology they claim to be against.

More Misogynist Fun!

2007-12-25T14:12:00.000-08:00

Sorry about the long absence. I haven't posted in a while and my last couple posts didn't have anything to do with bashing women. But I am back!

For starters, let's go over some things that women are soley responsible for:

1. the extinction of the dinasours
2. the Ice Age
3. The fall of the Minoan Civilization
4. If Atlantis really existed, women are what caused it to be plunged into the sea
5. The fall of the Roman Empire
6. World War I
7. World War II
8. The Holocaust
9. A bunch of other shit

conclusion: women=bad

N'kisi the parrot

2007-12-16T04:40:00.000-08:00

N'kisi is a parrot who has been taught by his owner, Aimee Morgana, to actually use language to communicate. Unlike most parrots who just repeat random shit N'kisi can actually hold a conversation.

Controversial researcher Rupert Sheldrake has run an experiment and concluded that N'kisi is mildly telepathic with Miss Morgana. Whether this is true or not the very fact that Sheldrake is associated with the bird has caused a lot of other researchers to stay clear so N'kisi's amazing use of language is not really being studied.

I'm talking about N'kisi because he is so cute! You can find audio of him online but this transcript of a conversation between N'kisi and Morgana is just too adorable for words:

N'Kisi: "Remember, we went in a car"
Aimee: "Yes! Did you like it?"
N'Kisi: "I like that - wanna go out in the car"
Aimee: "We can't, wo don't have a car now"
N'Kisi: "Wanna go in a car right now"
Aimee: "I'm sorry, we can't right now - maybe we can go again later"
N'kisi: "Why can't I go in a car now?"
Aimee: "Because we don't have one"
N'kisi: "Let's get a car"
Aimee: "No Kisi, we can't get a car now"
N'kisi: "I want a car"
Aimee: "I'm sorry, baby, not today"
N'kisi: "Hurry up, wanna go in a car. Remember? We were in a car"

Something in "The Mist"

2007-12-10T11:00:00.000-08:00

Well, Steven King's "The Mist" has been made in to a movie. When I read "The Mist" (TM from now on) I thought two things:
1. What the fuck?! That's the ending? What? Shit!
2. If done right, it could be one of the greatest movies ever made.

TM is a novella that was really meant to be a movie. I knew if it was a movie that it would be done poorly thus ruining it but it actually was done okay. All in all, it was a decent, entertaining movie with a horrendusly shitty ending. The ending of the book is frustrating but really great and chilling when you think about it.

things that kept the movie from being even a fraction as great as it could have been:

1. not true enough to the book: it was much truer to the book than I expected but it could easilly have been even more so. They added some week stuff and took some other stuff out for no reason. Bunch of baloney.
2. special effects were week, they should have used puppets, ala "Alien" to make the monsters more realistic
3. The ending, they should have kept the original kickass ending and ditched the shitty ass new ending which is stupid, unscary and makes no sense whatsoever.

King gave the movie his "kosher" stamp which proves that he is a woman loving faggot whore.

Ron Paul: The Masculinist Canidate?

2007-11-06T06:42:00.000-08:00

By now you probably have heard about Ron Paul... again and again and again. He doesn't get too much mainstream media coverage but he is the star of the internet. His campaign so far is kinda like Howard Dean meets Ross Perot. Internet driven with fanatical grassroots supporters who believe only he can save the country.

On matters of domestic policy, Paul is the only serious canidate who is serious about dismantling the Matriarchy. He also is actually honest, unlike everybody else in the race (except maybe Kucinich). But I cannot support him and actually am looking forward to voting against him. Why? Two reasons:

1. Foreign Policy: Paul is an isolationist/non-interventionist, meaning he doesn't want America to be all up in everybody's bieznass. I'm with him on that but he wants to immediately withdrawal from Iraq and I think that would be a huge mistake because Iraq would fall into civil war with devestating effects of the world oil market and consequently, the world economy. Gas prices are already way too high without making things even worse.

2. I dislike him personally and I absolutely revile his supporters. I know that sounds like a petty reason to be against somebody but you have to understand that when I say I "revile" his supporters, I am not engaging in hyperbole. I gueniunely have a white-hot hatred for his fans. They are so fucking annoying. I look forward to Paul losing in the primaries so I can witness their wailing and gnashing of teeth.

In conclusion I posted this because Ron Paul is an intriguing canidate and I'm tired of his piece of shit supporters, I also want to increase traffic to my blog and the very mention of "Ron Paul" is a sure fire way to do that.

Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul!

Darren Mack: Hero of the Resistance

2007-10-31T08:28:00.000-07:00

Darren Mack's trial has begun.

As you all know Dmac is on trial for killing his bitch ex-wife and the mangina judge in his family court case. The courts committed a grave injustice against him so he was left on his own to get justice for himself.

Mangina judge Chuck Weller did not handle himself well on the stand at all. More updates will come later. I can't wait to read the feminist reactions to the trial of this one man who has taken up arms against the Matriarchy.

Sucks to be you, women

2007-10-29T09:05:00.000-07:00

on some gay ass feminist site (I think Iblamethepatriarchy) the idiot author/authors wrote about this case of a teenage girl getting gang raped (allegedly) by some drunken college retards. The article was typical feminist blather but I want to analyse some of the comments.

Let's do it!

Sylvanite May 24th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
I’m officially sick of sports, the people who play sports, and the fans of sports. I would appreciate it very much if men everywhere decided that basket weaving and other arts and crafts were worthy manly pursuits. Preferably to be pursued while sober and miles from the nearest woman.

Diss!

2 ashes May 24th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
I’m crying. It’s day like this you just hate this whole rotten world.

What, are you serious? You are fucking crying over this? Jesus Christ, be a man.

3 Amanda Marcotte May 24th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Thank god for Nifong and the immoral media! The hoopla over the Duke case has now made it quite likely that gang rape will be tacitly legal, because prosecuters will be scared to death to prosecute.

Word! Way to fuck yourselves in the ass you stupid feminist dykes. Your errant mangina slave soldier Nifong really screwed you ho's. Hah!

4 Erin May 24th, 2007 at 4:41 pm
This is one of those things where my brain just shuts off. If I began to fully grasp the disgusting implications of this situation I think I’d have an aneurism. And I’m loving that ONE quote they are using from a witness throughout all the articles. “I didn’t think of it as a rape situation.” Can we hear from one of the women who took her to the hospital? Or how about the one guy who supposedly tried to stop it.

Because sweety, ink costs money and the paper isn't going to waste it printing a bunch of feminine nonsense.

5 Kumachka May 24th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Wash’t the idea of team sports to channel male aggression so they wouldn’t run around raping and pillaging? Or was it simply to tire them out so they wouldn’t question The Man?
6 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 4:49 pm

No.

The idea of team sports is to hone the skills necessary for success in life under a paradigm of dominance and submission.
7 trailer park May 24th, 2007 at 4:52 pm

No.

I just can’t comprehend how this could possibly be seen as anything but rape.
Some adult gave the victim alcohol, illegally. Three witnesses can testify that she was semi-conscious, vomiting (unable to keep anything down), and that they had to carry her out of the house she was so drunk. They can also testify that the men were holding the door closed. Why would they have to hold the door closed if this was consensual sex? AND SHE IS UNDERAGE! How is this not a crime?? HOW? How much more evidence do they need?
8 kanea May 24th, 2007 at 5:01 pm

Thanks to your premature ejaculation over the whole Duke thing, a lot more than they have, apparently.

there aren’t enough words in the two languages I know to discribe my disgust. I really really hope that some one (perhapse this school’s women’s lib group?) will start protests at sporting events. if this was my school those players would be the one’s who have to leave.
9 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:07 pm

Congradulations, your school is a liberal cesspool!

Why are these guys being treated like real athletes? These guys are on a *community* college team. What’s next? We’ll let the little league team commit larceny? This has absolutely nothing to do with sports.
10 Shabnam May 24th, 2007 at 5:16 pm

Okay, that is just hilarious. Give credit where credit is due.

District Attorneys are elected aren’t they? Isn’t this problematic? (I’m not American, so correct me if I’m wrong). Is Dolores Carr trying to court the votes of Dude Nation?
11 badkitty May 24th, 2007 at 5:17 pm

Is that some feminist code speak? I've never heard that phrase before. It sounds gay.

Two of the women who rescued the girl have spoken to the press.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/13370961/detail.html
12 Shabnam May 24th, 2007 at 5:17 pm

I'm too lazy to read the link so I won't comment.

Or the votes of men who really hate teenage girls. Unfortunately, perhaps that is not such a small constituency.
13 Joanna May 24th, 2007 at 5:18 pm

Or the votes of men who are understandably weary of other men getting railroaded on the say so of a couple of drunken ho's.

And I would bet good money that the three young women who rescued this child are now being harassed.
14 vera May 24th, 2007 at 5:23 pm

Let's hope so.

In her election campaign, Carr had to battle expectations that she would not be independent enough of the police, because her husband is on the police force.
If I had any hope left, it would go toward the possibility that she will have something more to battle in the next election: an outraged public.
This morning I sent a letter to the state attorney general, hoping that someone in that office might think an investigation is in order. I don’t know, however, if that’s the correct office to contact.
15 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:25 pm

Sending a letter, that'll get things done.

Shabnam, Dolores Carr is trying to prove that she wasn’t lying when she got elected on a platform of “my San Jose police detective husband will in no way influence my decisions as DA.” True enough; ostensibly she and the cops depart wildly from each other on this case.
Oh, and she’s trying to court the votes of Dude Nation.
16 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:27 pm

There it is again!

I see Vera has already answered Shabnam’s question. Someday I will understand blogs.
17 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:27 pm

Za?

The Sherriff’s ofice is keeping the case open.
“Sources told CBS 5 that the Sheriff’s Office was considering a range of options from re-starting the investigation, to re-filing on new, lesser charges against the baseball players for having unlawful sex with a minor, or furnishing a minor with alcohol.”
I get the impression that the sheriff is watching and waiting for has the rapist who committed the hit/run to strike again.
18 A. May 24th, 2007 at 5:28 pm

Probably not.

Okay, the really devastating quotation for me is from the article linked by bad kitty. Speaking of the victim: “When they lifted her head up, her eyes moved and she said ‘I’m sorry.’”
jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?
19 redhead May 24th, 2007 at 5:31 pm

Cause she was drunk and didn't know what the hell was going on? Everybody says that they are sorry when they are drunk. I once apologized to my carpet for throwing up on it.

badkitty, thanks for the link. The lowlight is this, from one of the gang-rapers: “This is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.” She did what - gang-raped herself when she was so drunk she was vomiting and had to be carried out of the house?
20 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:36 pm

Something like that.

â€œWhen they lifted her head up, her eyes moved and she said â€˜Iâ€™m sorry.â€™â€
I do not have the ovaries to continue reading general coverage of this bullshit anymore, but jesus tapdancing christ. This is precisely why I write this fucking blog; I keep hoping, against all reason, that some parent somewhere will read it and think “Oh! Wow. Maybe I should try to imbue my son with some sense of T & B. And while I’m at it, maybe I should become a feminist.”

What's T and B?

21 redhead May 24th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?
She’s a woman in a patriarchy. She really shouldn’t be out in public, let alone thinking she has the right to drink at a party where there are men without relegating herself to the slut class.
22 Maryam May 24th, 2007 at 5:40 pm

No. See my earlier explanation above.

â€œThis is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.â€
Excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall.
23 delphyne May 24th, 2007 at 5:40 pm

Don't mind me, go right ahead (pun not intended)

“jesus god what made her think she should be sorry?”
A crime has been committed so someone needs to take the blame. As rapists are never to blame it falls on the victim to accept responsibility. That’s why everybody blames the victim too, at some level they know something terrible has happened, but they can’t quite bring themselves to blame men for their crimes against women, so the outrage gets conveniently transferred to the victims.
24 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

No. For the last time, read what I wrote above about her apology. It's like I'm talking to a brick wall here.

delphyne nails it, as usual.
25 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 5:46 pm

Delphyne, it’s called shame, and all survivors of sexual assault carry it (myself included).
26 delphyne May 24th, 2007 at 5:52 pm

Oh shut up.

Me too lawbitch. I’m questioning why it happens. It’s just my own theory, but I think if communities were genuinely outraged about rape and supportive to victims that victims would find it easier (not easy though) to recover and not to blame ourselves. I mean if we can’t blame the rapist, it must be our fault, right? It’s the stinkiest of stinky dynamics.
27 kate May 24th, 2007 at 6:01 pm

See what I wrote above? There is plenty to go around.

Reports like these make me want to commit violent acts against men. Hit them, beat them, kill them.
Yeah, yeah, I know it solves nothing, I guess.

Sure it would, in fact, I encourage you to go this route. Please, please, please do all of those things. Go up to a man and attempt to "hit and beat" him, see what happens to you. Please God, let some woman be stupid enough to attack me.
28 De anza player May 24th, 2007 at 6:04 pm

sounds like you sure do buy in to the way the media twists a case in a girls direction…ever thought about what happened before the girl went in that roo…what she was doing…..saying….acting….perhaps when the truthful story comes out after all this dies down you will lower your chin a bit and look in the mirror…..the media is not the accurate source of info. they were not there in that room…i was….justice has been served

Don't try to reason with women, they are gay.

29 SimonJericho May 24th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
This is completely beyond the fucking pale. Insufficient evidence??? I was apparently under the mistaken impression that eyewitness accounts were still admissable in court and that even our present batch of misogynist fuckwits in the legal system included “Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by theaccused (taken directly from the California Penal Code),” in their definition of rape. Absolutely nauseating. There should be violent vigilantes for this kind of situation.

I agree! Please go that route! See what happens to you.

I don’t know why I’m so surprised, really. Even community college athletes are obviously worth far more to the community than some stupid, drunken slut, right?

Wow! We agree on something else!

After all, where would we be as a country if we let a little thing like a brutal gang rape interfere with the capacity of witless virile evolutionary events to hit leather wrapped spheres with crude phallic objects, to the adoration of thousands (okay, probably closer to dozens; this is community college, after all) of equally witless but less virile asshats with nothing to do on a Sunday afternoon? Fuck all these people.
30 lawbitch May 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm

That made no sense whatsoever.

I’ve been working on shame. Shame has a psychological function. Shame allows the victim to believe that she had control over her own life.
In my case, I suffered sexual abuse as a child.

You probably just imagined it.

I clearly understand on an intellectual level that I was in no way responsible. I *needed* to feel like I had some control over my own body, even when that control did not exist. As an adult, I’ve even thought that it was my fault for not telling. My DH called me on that and reminded me that I would have been beaten for telling the truth. He is absolutely right. I did what I had to do to survive.

Keep telling yourself that you slut. You let it happen, you probably enjoyed it, didn't you?

31 Twisty May 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Well, well, well. ‘De anza player’, since you were there, by all means enlighten the group. We await ‘the truthful story’ with bated breath.
Just kidding! Banned!

::sigh:: Women...

32 kanea May 24th, 2007 at 6:15 pm
re kate.“Reports like these make me want to commit violent acts against men. Hit them, beat them, kill them.
Yeah, yeah, I know it solves nothing, I guess.”
I think most sane people feel like that after reading new like this; at least a little bit. logic comes in and reminds you that you’d get arrested and it doesn’t change the fact that it happened.

Your excuse for innaction is fear of arrest? What a bunch of bullshit. You know that wouldn't shit happen to you you dumb harlot, atleast nothing from the police that is. You are such a cowardly female you can't even admit to another cowardly females how much of a cowardly female you are. Dumbass ho. Try attacking a man and then mail be a picture of his face when he is done with you. Cunt.

Women's greatest weakness

2007-10-27T07:05:00.000-07:00

What I am about to say may seem obvious to most of you, but I am very out of touch with women (because I have so little regard for them) so it is quasi-news to me.

THE issue that bothers women the most is rape. Not violence against women, not abortions, not the wage gap, not anything else. Rape is a particularly important issue to Feminists (notice the capitolization, all women are atleast lowercase feminists but not all are capitol Feminists) because it is the ultimate proof of woman's inherent inferiority.

I can't go so far as to support rape, I still think it's wrong and should be punished, but I like that women need to live in fear of rape. I like that I have found an issue that the mere mention of can reduce most Feminists to tears. If you want to cause pain to a woman, make a joke about rape. I will be sure to do this more in my own life.

In some spats I had with females during the years, I wonder if they mistakingly took my belligerent attitude as being a threat of rape, which I didn't intend, as opposed to just the threat of violence, which was the effect I was going for.

In conclusion: rape is funny

More on Mangina Asswipe Steven King

2007-10-24T22:47:00.000-07:00

The beautiful essay that I crafted below was inspired by reading some more feminist drivel by supreme douchebag woman-lover, Stephen King. In his fucking book Insomnia there is all this feminist bullshit. Well fuck all of that. Fuck Steven King and fuck women and fuck feminism. Fuck.

You may be able to gather that the little dipshit hack fuckwad has really gotten under my skin this time so I will tell you what made me so angry.

It starts with this really minor character bitch who has got bruises all on her face from her husband. King of course can't leave it at that, the last you hear from the uppity cunt King mentions "the fading bruises of the last beating a man woud ever give her...". Are you fucking kidding me? Fuck you Steven King.

Oh yeah, I can just feel the strength of this newly empowered womyn oozing from the pages. Any woman who feels so strong and empowered can come give that shit to me and see what I do to your fucking face. Listen to me you stupid bitches, you are not my fucking equal! I will fucking kick the shit out of you if you try that "independent" shit with me.

Why does this make me so mad? Because its bullshit. I'm tired of women babbling about how independent they are while hiding behind Big Sister's skirt. If you bitches didn't have Big Sister's Mangina slave-soldiers lets see how fucking independent you are. Dumb cunts. Fuck you. If you really are strong and independent you don't have to go out advertising it. You ever see a man brag about how "independent" he is? Of course not, because all men are de facto independent whereas all you are totally dependent on us, one way or another. Stupid twats. Fuck you. You want to be equal? Well you can start by acting like a man instead of a entitled twat fraud. By yourself a gun, learn Brazilian Ju Jitsu and get yourself a high paying job. Live your life and don't give people a bunch of bullshit about how "strong" you are. You act like this and we will give you your props, there are some legitimately tough women out there (see "Snoop" from HBO's The Wire), but they are usually one's who just try to be one of the guys and they are usually embraced and respected as such. There are no legitimately strong feminist though, just a buch of uppity harpy cunts.

There is more Stephen King I could complain about but I don't feel like it right now.

Thought Provoking Essay

2007-10-24T22:43:00.000-07:00

Fuck you, women! Fuck. You. Stupid ass cunts. Fuck your empowered bullshit. A man needs a woman like a bicycle needs a fish you entitled uppity cunts. Fuck your goddamn independence you fuckhead cumwads. You can all fucking die! Fuck your goddamn mangina slave-soldier guardians, Fuck em! I will fucking put your teeth on the curb and stomp the of your head you stupid twats. Die you stupid bitches! Just fucking die! You worthless bitches should be cut into pieces you cunt headed bitch heads!

Violence against women is good

2007-10-20T04:58:00.000-07:00

"Violence against women", for the lack of a better phrase, is good. Violence against women is right. Support violence against women.

Let's say you are walking down the street and you see some random woman, if you beat her up, that would be wrong; so it isn't always good when women are attacked but sometimes it is. Let's examine some evidence from Feministing.com that proves that violence against women is good:

Because Mommy has the dubious virtue of being the one who has to carry and give birth to the baby. And let's not forget the mommies who can't get abortions for whatever reason (I notice they all get left out of these discussions) - the mommies who don't believe in abortion, who can't afford abortion, who don't have access to abortion or whose parents prevent them from getting abortions.
An abortion isn't snapping your fingers and wishing the pregnancy away. It's money shelled out, it's a surgical procedure, it's choices made, and it's not always easy. Some women can't do it. And they end up with a child that needs support just as much as any child that was kept because the woman desperately wanted to be a mother.
Here's the thing: Mommy can make a choice before there is a child to worry about, in most cases. As was pointed out above, men may consider it unfair that she gets two chances to make this choice (pre-sex and then pre-birth), but that's the way reproduction works, and there's nothing we can do about it until men figure out a way to be the ones who get pregnant.
However, once there is a child, nobody has a choice. The child needs care. Child support is for the child's care. Hence, the non-custodial parent pays child support. Paying child support and abortion are not equal, and it's disingenuous to compare the two. One is a choice made pre-child. The other is not a choice because there is unquestionably a child whose welfare must be paramount.
That's really all there is to it.

This piece of nonsense was from a ho on feministing.com, a website that I love to hate. While for legal reasons I would never say somebody should harm a woman who says such things I think we can all agree that if harm were to come to her that it would be a good thing. The author of the preceding post is a good example of the kind of woman who it would be funny to see at the receiving end of violence. I'm not going to bother refuting what she said because she is a dumb cunt.

Bashing a woman

2007-10-19T02:36:00.000-07:00

I almost feel guilty about the way I am going to tear into this girl's writing because unlike most feminists, she seems to be a nice person. So I guess this time it isn't personal, its just business.

Since feminism began, there have been opponents. Sometimes, those opponents have been women who don't want to upset the balance for fear of retribution, for fear of losing their social position, for fear of not attracting a husband, whatever. Mostly, though, the opponents of feminism are and have been men. Not all men, of course, oppose the ideals of feminism. But most of the opponents of feminism are men.

Good intro.

I have talked a lot in previous posts about how socialization is responsible for gender roles,

oh-no. ... Here we go...

and how that socialization has particularly affected women. However, masculine socialization is just as powerfully directive as feminine socialization. Masculine socialization is not inherently oppressive, the way feminine socialization is, but it is, nevertheless, a powerful force that moulds boys into men who play out patriarchal hierarchies in society. Boys are taught from an early age to act like men, which involves primarily not acting like women. Masculinity is tied to sexuality - both sex, and heterosexuality, in particular. Failure to act in masculine ways de-sexes a man, makes him appear not fully a man. So what does masculinity look like?
First, masculinity is the embodiment of such characteristics as success, independence, aggressiveness, physical strength, emotional strength, and dominance.

More or less. I don't know if those values are exclusively seen as masculine any more though.

Second, masculinity is the manifestation of these characteristics through social relationships with other men (relatinoships with women are primarily sexual).

Ridiculous.

Third, masculinity is defined by what it is not: not feminine, not homosexual, not being dependent, not being emotional, not being submissive, not being compliant, not being effeminate, not failing in sexual relationships with women, not failing to not have sexual relationships with men, not failing to have social relationships with men.

Good, if somewhat obvious, points

Also, all masculinities are not created equal: the definitive masculinity is that of white, middle class, able-bodied, heterosexual men. Men who fall outside this narrow category are less masculine - or sometimes are demonized into hypersexual beings, as has happened with black men since the time of slavery.

Yeah, this is true.

Through this definition, men learn to be sexist, heterosexist/homophobic (the term homophobic denotes a "fear" of homosexuals, and the truth is that heterosexual men are taught not just to fear homosexuals, but to hate them in the same way whites are taught to fear and hate blacks and other ethnic groups), and racist. Masculinity is tied to all these forms of hating others.
Sexism: First, men are taught to hate women, to see women as being for a specific purpose: caring for men and providing men with sex and children. Men are taught that it is "natural" for men and women to be and act a certain way and that those ways are "naturally" consucive to certain types of roles, jobs, etc. Men are taught to view women as objects, property.

In Afghanistan maybe, not in America. In the West men are taught to worship women who are constantly hyped as being soooo great.

Since masculinity teaches men not to be like women, any slip from that set of guidelines into feminine behaviour makes a man less masculine, and vulnerable to attack by stronger men who may usurp them and their property, including their woman. So, for fear of this happening, men try to adhere to a flight from femininity as much as possible, and they learn to hate women for embodying the characteristics that they fear.

Pathetic attempt at psychoanalysis. Baloney all.

Women represent home, emotion, familial responsibility, dependence on others - the opposite of fun. Men gain masculinity points by putting down women and what they represent… or making a show of that masculine trait, aggressiveness, toward women.

Aggressiveness towards women is condemned in our culture, atleast officially. Pop culture, especially TV, often features weak/stupid men being dominated by independent womyn.

Heterosexism/Homophobia: Second, men are taught to only have sex with women, not with men.

Most men don't need to be taught that

This is what women are for, and it undermines one's masculinity to not participate in a heterosexual sexual relationship.

False.

Having sex with men is what women do, not men, and so homosexuality is closer to feminine sexuality than to masculine sexuality. On the flip side of this, men are expected to have primarily, if not exclusively, homosocial relationships - that is, social relationships with members of their own gender. Men who are too friendly with women but are not having sex with those women are suspected of being too much like women in other characteristics. Men are constantly evaluating one another's masculine performances, playing off one another's masculinity. The fear is that they will not measure up, and will be revealed as a fraud. And so, men learn to fear other men, fear being unmasculine, fear being perceived as feminine. And feminine men are deemed homosexual.

Except for the last line, that paragraph was bullshit

Racism: Finally, men are taught to fear and hate men of other ethnic backgrounds. I won't got into a long list of examples here; it will suffice to say that white men are taught to find ways in which men of different ethnicities are not masculine enough, and in the effort to gain a piece of the masculinity pie, men of different ethnic backgrounds respond by doing the same thing to all other ethnicities combined with acting in a masculine a way as possible.

Bleh... I don't even care

Masculinity is primarily about power. Feminists have identified this for centuries, that men are preoccupied with power, that men have the most social and economic and political power, that men exert that power over women. However, most men do not feel powerful! The huge pressures of masculinity prevent men from feeling powerful, and instead make men feel powerless.

Most men are and have historically been politically and economically powerless. In the past though they did have power over women. I will give the writer that much.

Men are raised to believe they are entitled to power,

Again, maybe in Afghanistan. In America they are raised to believe women are great and should run everything and that they should be manginas.

but do not feel they have it. They are pressed on all sides by masculinity, sexism, racism, heterosexism/homophobia. They have to live up to these standards, and do not feel free to simply be who they (may) want to be.

False.

No wonder men do not respond well to feminism! First, feminism identifies men as having the balance of power in society, and most men do not feel they have that power. Second, feminism argues for a redistribution of that power, and men want to hang onto whatever power they feel they do have. And when women do make strides that allow them to break away from oppressive gender roles, men are threatened.

Last line is true for at least some men.

So, how can men learn to feel less threatened by feminism? By recognizing that masculinity, like femininity, is socially constructed, and can be socially deconstructed in the same ways that women have been and are deconstructing femininity.

Feminist have flopped at deconstructing feminity because it is not a social construct. Neither is masculinity. Well, there are certainly social elements to it but it is biologically based.

By recognizing that being a man does not necessarily mean being sexist, racist, homophobic.

::roll eyes::

Is this realistic? I don't know. Many men do not want to give up the power they have, however small it may be.

We already have. Now it is your turn to give up the power you have over us.

But, I ask you this: does it have to be a zero-sum equation? Does more power for women necessarily mean less power for men?

Theoretically, no. But in practice that is what has happened, to say the least.

Can it be seen as a positive, as sharing rather than dominance? More power for women will mean that things will change - but couldn't it just be true that those changes will be good for everyone?

Sure, as was the case between 1920 when women got the vote and the 1960's when feminism took off.

I think it can. I think that as more women gain power and independence, they will enter the workforce throughout the world, economies will start to grow, and countries will be pulled out of poverty. Less children will be born, and they will be better cared for, so infant mortality rates will fall, child starvation rates will fall, and education opportunities will rise, which will lead to greater economic prosperity. Health care will be more accessible, and fewer people will die from preventable/treatable illnesses like malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. Empowerment for women is definitely a good thing for men.

This isn't feminism, it's common sense. Everybody wants to see all of those things happen.

How can men support feminism?
Stop objectifying women.

Yeah, that might happen. Women should take some responsibility and stop objectifying themselves, although men will always objectify them. If you see that as oppressive, too bad, because it won't ever stop.

Stop seeing women as things over which you have power. Stop seeing women as things over which you have ownership.

No men do.

Stop seeing women as having a specific purpose in relation to you. Stop seeing women as being perpetually sexually available.

No men do.

Stop viewing pornography.

Good luck with that one.

Stop raping women. Stop abusing women. Stop making excuses for any objectification of women.

Okay, I promise I will stop raping and abusing women, effective immediately.

Dumbass.

Start seeing women as equals.

No.

Give women the same respect and consideration you might give a man.

Most men do.

Assume that women have goals and dreams and desires exclusive of men, children, and families.

Most men do.

Start recognizing your own social, economic, and political power, and the lack of power held by women in relation to men. Recognize that women are oppressed, and that men are, by elimination, their oppressors.

Reverse the genders and you have what Masculinist want from women.

Recognize that while it may not be your fault, you participate in that oppression inherently, whether you want to or not, by subscribing to masculinity.

?

Support women's goals, dreams, and desires. Recognize that women will need special protections and assistance in order to pull out of oppression, and support such initiatives. Equality is not the same as equity. Women will need such measures as affirmative action to get a foothold. Don't complain about it. Support it.

No.

Stop being threatened by women, and by homosexual men (if you are heterosexual). Their existence doesn't detract from yours. So what if someone confuses you for a homosexual man? Who cares? It isn't important, it doesn't mean you are not a man. It doesn't mean you will never get laid again. It doesn't mean anything.

Agreed.

Support gay and lesbian rights. Stop demonizing homosexuals as sexual deviants, monsters, ungodly. Just stop it.

What does this have to do with sexism?

If you are heterosexual, encourage your girlfriend/wife to continue her female friendships. Isolating a woman within a romantic relationships and trying to control her movements outside that relationship is very bad. Women need solidarity, we need to organize together, we need to support one another.

I don't think women need to be encouraged to have female friends anymore than men need to be encouraged to have male friends but I guess there is nothing objectionable about this idea. I think it is sort of patronizing towards women, but hey, not my problem.

Don't make your female partner feel as though she should be threatened by other women for your attention/affection. Make sure she feels secure in your relationship.

Uhm, okay.

Support your female partner by sharing equally household tasks and childrearing tasks. Relegating women to the private sphere of home restricts her ability to reach her goals and dreams.

I agree with this provided she is working full time. If she doesn't work she should take care of the housework. If its the man that doesn't work he should take care of the housework. If both parties work than they should split the homemaking duties.

That's all I can think of. I hope this look into masculinity has been somewhat enlightening.

Well I disagree with most of what you said, but I applaud your straight forwardness and positive approach. Feminists like you are no fun.

1st chapter of my novella

2007-10-12T01:15:00.000-07:00

Alimonyby Otis the SweatyOtis the Sweaty Publications 2007Chapter 1: Working LateThe Schumacher's were a pair of cum stains. Tom supposed he could have said the same about a large portion of his clients but these two managed to take their douche baggery to a whole new level.Tom Phillips had been doing financial planning for 17 years, and had never once had a customer be dissatisfied with his performance. He knew what he was doing and did not need idiot clients looking over his shoulder telling him how to do his job; Kelly and Rick Schumacher, however, apparently did not understand that.

Kelly could best be described as a trophy wife of Rick's. Rick was a pudgy, balding and decidely Jewish looking man who could never have landed a knockout like Kelly without his millions of dollars. The problem with Kelly was that she didn't know she was a trophy wife, or if she did know she tried to be more than that. One of the ways she tried to show off her own intellectual prowness was to micro manage their finances. In the three monthes that Tom had the Schumacher's as clients he had put up with more bullshit from Kelly Scumsucker than from all of his other clients over the previous 17 years.

It had been at around 4 in the afternoon when Kelly had called up to do some of her signature meddling. She wanted Tom to make some "adjustments" to her and Rick's stock portfolio. Like most of her other ideas, these adjustments she wanted would not necessarily be wrong to make, but they were unnecessary and promised to waste a great deal of Tom's time.Tom spent over an hour on the phone with Kelly in what he knew to be a futile attempt to make her see reason. Finally he gave up and agreed to do what she wanted. Since the account involved the joint assets of Rick as well as Kelly, he could have tried going over her head to Rick but assuming he could even get in touch with Mr. Shmuckheader the chances that he would overrule his wife's latest idiocy were approximately nil. Might as well not waste any more time.

Tom briefly toyed with the idea of calling up Kelly and telling her to go to hell, but he literally could not afford to lose their multi million dollar account, plus the valuable other clients they might refer to him in the future. Money was tight, and Tom's wife Courtney's propensity to spend the money he earned like a drunken sailor certainly didn't help matters much. The reality is that he was stuck with Mr. and Mrs. Jizzbag. Reality sucks.

After around 6 hours of endless paperwork and other such bullshit Tom still didn't feel he was that much closer to turning Kelly's inspired vision into reality. He never had liked Kelly, other than her looks she had no redeeming features. But now he was actually starting to hate her. She was a bitch.

This whole situation was just so unfair. While he was trapped in his office busting his ass in the service of two wealthy morons his worthless bitch of a wife was at home watching TV, or eating, or sleeping, or "caring" for the children. In short, she was doing basically anything but actually working. Freeloading bitch.

The single biggest mistake Tom Phillips had ever made was Courtney McKinney. Actually, had he married another woman instead of Courtney than that woman would probably have been the biggest mistake of his life. Marriage and children are what turn a man into a wage slave; or atleast that is what Courtney and his two kids Harold and Samantha had made him into. It never occurred to Tom that many of his male coworkers were married with children and yet seemed very happy.

Deciding he wanted his 10th cup of coffee of the day he stood up and walked into the dark hallway towards the kitchen. Overwhelmed by the general lousiness of his life he punched the wall in an act of frustration. He looked blankly at his knuckles but couldn't see them very well in the dark. Still he could feel them starting to swell, he hadn't meant to hit the wall that hard. Shit."Fuck this," Tom said out loud.Indeed. Fuck this shit. Fuck the Schumacher's and fuck this job, it wasn't as if both of them wouldn't still be present in the morning (although that was hardly a comforting thought). For now atleast, he had had enough. He was done for the night. Time to go home.

Feminists are irresistable to men

2007-10-09T03:53:00.000-07:00

Men just love feminist women. They aren't able to keep their hands off them, just ask any feminist!

There is a recurring theme amongst feminist bloggers about how men are always either groping or atleast hitting on them constantly. Personally I think this is baloney in most cases as girls tend to believe every guy is attracted to them and interpret every smile from a guy as reflecting sexual interest. Feminist live under the delusion that they are certifiable man magnets. Like this ho (my testerone fueled replies in bold):

[guys who randomly touch me...]
Stop. Just stop. This goes for you, Mr. Three-Sheets-to-the-Wind Chuck-Norris-Wannabe on US Airways to Cleveland, snatching my tiny cup of raspberry vinaigrette out of my hands to open it for me without a word,

What probably happened: he probably saw your pathetic attempts to open the can by yourself and grew frustrated, eventually opening it for you so he wouldn't have to listen to you fumbling around with it. I would also like to point out that he didn't actually touch you, he touched your soda can.

but especially for you, Pervfesser Dickhead, sitting next to me in Photoshop class today. Who said you could, I’d like to know? Class started two hours ago and you’re patting me on the shoulder like I'm your golden retriever? The cold stare you netted the first time you went there obviously wasn't enough for you, since you did it again and I had to ask you to stop. “Don’t touch you?” Yes. “I was just being friendly.” Well don't be. If that's being friendly, be unfriendly. I don’t know you, you don’t know me, you don’t know if I want your friendship (I don't), and I’m certainly not going to let you pat me at will throughout the next four hours. And I’m tired of being nice about it. I’m tired of acting apologetic and making up excuses. I’m tired of spending the rest of the class fending off the bruised aura emanating from your enormous ego. I’m tired of spending my lunch hour trying to imagine circumstances under which I would touch anyone I’d just met, male or female, the way you touched me, and coming up blank.

Alright, this guy was definately hitting on you. I misunderstood this the 1st time I read this, I thought she was a college student saying she was getting hit on by some dude of about the same age , and that didn't all seem to add up given that this chick is undoubtably unnatractive, why would a guy be hitting on her right off the bat? Now that I understand the ho is probably in her 30's and this dude is in his most likely 20years her senior it makes sense: older guys have a drastically reduced standard of beauty, particularly when it comes to younger women.

I don't think this guy's behavior is horrific, but it is innapropriate and abnoxious. Give the bitch her due.

I’m tired of trying to imagine what it must be like to go through life honestly believing that your hands belong anywhere you want to put them, such that you’re offended when you’re told they don’t. I’m tired of being reminded how much I am still a woman of this culture because I’m worrying about what I did to make you think it was okay—was I too nice? Did I smile too much? Should I not have responded when you made that comment about my shoes? Do you know what would happen if I touched you that way? I do—you’d think it was a come-on. So why is it that I am not supposed to suspect your motives? If I touched you, and you welcomed my attention, and I then said, “I was just being friendly,” do you know what you would call me? I do—a tease. If you didn’t welcome my attention, do you know what you would do the rest of the afternoon? I do—ignore me, pretend I didn’t exist, since nothing's scarier than an obviously desperate fat girl!

Oh shit, even this oreo eating whore even admits she's fat. I've never heard a feminist admit to having any flaws before.

But once again, I got to give this bitch some props. I never really thought about the point she is making here before. Before I swore off women completely, I would make comments to girls sitting next to me in class or something even when I wasn't attracted to them. Actually, if I thought she was attractive I'd be more likely to not say anything because I didn't want her to think I was hitting on her. I would certainly never put my hands on somebody I just met but for the first time I realized that there was no way for these girls to know that I wasn't trying to hit on them. Unlike the bitch writing this rant I don't see that as a sign of oppressive patriarchy but it is something I never thought of before. It also makes me think that maybe sometimes I thought girls were trying to flirt with me maybe they were just making conversation. Interesting.

So why is it that I’m being rude if I try to get on with the business of learning—which after all is what I paid to be there for—by trying to forget you’re sitting there, trying to stop steeling the right half of my body against further onslaughts from your direction? Why am I rude if I tell you not to touch me?

You're not and nobody would say you were. He might have his ego bruised but there no outside observer of the situation would view you as in the wrong. This whole situation has nothing whatsoever to do with sexism. The genders could easily be reversed. You are a dumb bitch.

Why is it that the woman is always wrong?Here’s a primer, dudes. You know how you’re so frustrated because you don’t know what to do about sexism and male privilege?

Sexism is a two way street you entitled whore, and there is no male privledge in the West ya dumb fucking harlot cunt.

Keep your frickin’ hands to yourself. And tell your buddies to do the same. Because if a woman wants you to touch her, she’ll let you know.

Is this a joke? She might let you know in suttle ways but 9x out of 10 she ain't gonna come out and say it. And who can blame her? Asking someone to touch or kiss you just is weird. Girls generally don't like being asked by guys if they can kiss them either, it sounds gay. If a girl asked me if she could kiss me I would be totally weirded out. This is day one stuff. Maybe it isn't right, but it is the way it is. This has nothing to do with sexism.

I can guarantee a woman you met in a Photoshop class two hours ago does not want you to touch her.* It's pretty easy not to touch women you don't know. You just don't touch women you don't know. But even if it's someone you do know, there’s an easy way to avoid all this unpleasantness--ask. Say, “Is it okay if I touch you?”**

No, no, no! Don't do that. You will weird the bitch out. If you aren't comfortable with touching without asking permission first then do not touch, I guess me and the writer agree on this. But under no circumstances do you ask somebody for permission to touch them, ever. Do not do it. This is the same for both genders and has nothing to do with sexism, again.

If she comes back with anything that isn’t, “Yes, please,”*** then back right the hell off without being a prick about it. You were wrong; act like it. Say, “Sorry,” and mean it, and don’t hold that grudge.

Fair enough, but that isn't how it is going to work most of the time. This is just human nature. Let's say a girl gets a "don't touch me" from a guy whose shoulder she patted. She is gonna feel rejected and resentful, even if she knows she shouldn't. This has nothing to do with sexism.

Even better, just wait until she touches you first.

Ah, now who's being sexist? Stupid bitch.

I’ve worked in the medical field for 15 years and I have never heard of anyone’s dick falling off from failing to make the first move. You can wait the hour or day or week or month it takes for her to feel comfortable enough to let you know, in completely unambiguous ways, that you’re welcome. It won’t kill you. Trust me. If you really object to being classed with the mugger/stalker/rapist du jour, then stop acting like him.

Patting a girl on the shoulder may not be classy or appropriate, but it can not be compared to the behavior of a stalker or rapist. Stupid bitch.

Stop demonstrating that you share his fundamental ideology. Women’s bodies, even our shoulders, hands, heads, hair, or other “harmless” parts, are NOT yours for the patting or squeezing or groping anytime you should feel the urge. If you don't have explicit permission, you DON'T HAVE PERMISSION

False. As almost any female on the planet can tell you.

, and we’re not wrong for explicitly demanding that you respect our bodily integrity. YOU’RE wrong for making that explicitness necessary.______*That’s why mommy always told you to say “Excuse me,” when you brush someone in the grocery store. Because in this culture it’s UNACCEPTABLE to put your hands all over strangers.**If it’s a romantic encounter I promise you that asking will only enhance the mood. ***

No it won't, just the opposite, but as someone who shuns women this doesn't really concern me so I'll just give it the ol' "whatever".

[end crappy article]

We see here just more of the same old feminine sense of entitlement. They are all that and men believe they own them and can touch them at will. Fuck you, women. You are all gay as shit.

Are Women as Intelligent as Men?

2007-10-06T03:19:00.001-07:00

No.

Some Women I Admire

2007-10-06T02:14:00.001-07:00

As a misogynist, a lot of people might expect that I would not admire any women. At most I might pretend to admire some more "traditional" women. That is not the case, here is a list that is by no means exhaustive:

1. My Mom: She is a successful attorney who regularly works 70+ hour weeks. Still manages to be a good mother (I have two siblings). When her career first began she was occasionally sexually harassed but just ignored it without turning in to a feminist cunt. I admire her more than anyone else in the world, male or female.

2. Queen Elizabeth: That bitch was a bad ass. She stared down the King of Spain and made England into a world power. Never became a feminist cunt.

3. Catherine the Great: More or less the same as Elizabeth, great ruler who expanded Russia's territory and influence. Also not an uppity feminist cunt.

4. Judit Polgar: Who? She is the world's greatest female chess player. She is one of the 10 best players in the world period. She humiliated Gary Kasparov in a tournament game in 1994 when he (probably the greatest player of all time) was reduced to cheating to win (i.e. he touched one piece but then moved another, once you touch a piece you have to move it, he denied doing this but was caught on tape, it was pathetic). She will never become world champion because, since she is a woman, she isn't good enough but she is still a damn good player. She broke Bobby Fischer's record for youngest player to ever become a Grandmaster when she was 15 (that record has since been shattered by many young men, I think the current record for youngest GM is 10yrs old). From day 1 she has refused to play in Women's only events but not because she is an uppity cunt but just because they would not provide her with any competition. Her older sister is not nearly as good but is much more uppity and is always talking about "bringing more women into chess" and how she suffered discrimination as a woman player. Judit, however, has never brought up her gender or whined about discrimination.

There are other women I admire but those are the big ones. I think this shows that I am not one of the "women should be seen, not heard" crowd (although such people are welcome in the AWC, we accept everyone who is anti-woman). A great deal of women, however, certainly should be seen and not heard, (or in some cases, not seen either), here is a very short list:

1. Christina Aguilera: Uppity cunt. Not bad looking though, high quality sex object.

2. Martha Burke: The ho who wanted to force Augusta National (where the "Master's" is played in golf) to allow women members. What a bitch.

3. Kim Gandy: Prez of NOW. 'Nuff said.

More gay ass women

2007-10-03T23:35:00.000-07:00

http://msjared.blogspot.com/2006/07/groomzillas.html

Ms. Jared is a stupid cunt, let's go over the comments by other cunts to her gay article.

For background let's go over the general theme of the article. Aside from it's tone of feminine indignation and general gayness it makes a pretty good point. The article is basically to bash middle aged guys who go overseas to get some real hot piece of ass that is supposedly submissive and would otherwise be totally out of these guy's league. As y'all know the AWC opposes mail order brides but we also respect the right of men to pursue them if they so desire. We happen to think, however, that such guys are kinda pathetic and just plain stupid, because marriage in the West is a tool of Matriarchal oppression. But we strongly oppose MJ's feminazi thesis that men shouldn't be allowed to pursue women from overseas. Well, not really, but we do oppose the reason for which she opposes it.

The AWC might reconsider it's position on foreign brides just because they seem to be so offensive to women.

Anyway, she also rips into Hugo which I found interesting. Hugo apparently expressed some sympathy for these clowns (the one's in the Ukraine lookin' for a new ho) and MJ did not take to kindly to that at all. Upon further research I've discovered that Big H really isn't too popular with radfems online. I guess I shouldn't be surprised because while Hugo is a mangina, he isn't really a man hater. To his credit, he doesn't really seem to hate anyone or anything. This has earned him the wrath of many a feminist.

Anyway, as I indicated above the comments are more interesting then the article itself. Here we go!

13 Comments:

When he "had" a touch of that entitlement? Hugo's track record hardly reflects that he's free of that men-get-firsties mentality.And even if he is, OK, he feels compassion for the creeps, he sympathizes with the sexists, he's down with the humanity of the woman-haters, we get it, we get it, we're renting a squadron of fifty-seven skywriting planes so we can write "we get it" in purple smoke over the entire eastern seaboard, for christ's sweet sake, WE GET IT, HUGO. More fury, less "why can't you see where the haters are coming from," please. God.
By Mary, at July 12, 2006 3:19 PM

Holy shit! Are you kidding me? Hugo as a misogynist? I mean, Jesus fuck! If she think's Hugo hates women then I guess so does literally every other man on earth. If even Hugo isn't a big enough mangina for this ho, then who is?

nuomena, i get that hugo explained why he feels compassion for the men and their so-called "loneliness and woundedness" but i think it's bullshit. i don't think the majority of those men are "lonely" or "wounded", i think they're assholes who are alone BECAUSE they're assholes.
By ms. jared, at July 12, 2006 3:42 PM

You go girl! Seriously, that was actually kind of an insightful comment. Funny and so true.

also, it just really rubbed me the wrong way that throughout that whole fucked up essay with the numerous examples of how heinous and disgusting these men are...
By ms. jared, at July 12, 2006 3:48 PM

These guys were a gang of cum-stains, no denying that, but I saw nothing in the article that indicates that they are evil incarnate. These fella's are just a bunch of inconsequential chumps. Ms. Jared's fury at them is really just anger at the fact that women aren't anything more than glorified sex objects. These guys are evil just cause they are trying to take advantage of a fact that every man knows.

Well, for the same reason I wouldn't call myself anti-racist if I made a POINT of making it WELL FUCKING KNOWN how much I cry over the plight of KKK members, Noumena. Because it's disingenuous and assy and, frankly, offensively stupid.I read this issue of Harper's on a plane, and got a number of funny looks as I worked through that article. Particularly the "watching the stock come in" line. God, I wish, I wish SO HARD, that it were as easy for me to make people feel small as it is for men like that. Maybe that's why I became a lawyer (lol obligatory "lawyers are evil" joke).
By Mary, at July 13, 2006 4:38 AM

Wow, this Mary chick sounds like quite the cunt. I like her line about how she wishes she could make men feel small the same way we can do to her. It just shows that these Empowered Womyn can't even take a verbal jab. When I was in college I put up a piece of looseleaf paper on a bulletin board in the Women's Studies center reading "Women are Glorified Birth Machines". Mary's hyper sensitivity gives me hope that my small action successfully caused atleast 1 woman pain. Keep up the good work boys!

You know, I never did get to feel like the beautiful princess, either--possibly because I was too busy being ABUSED BY MEN.If the most these guys have to complain about is that they're too repulsive to get poontang, I WANT TO HAVE THEIR FUCKIN LIVES.Whatever, "wife"-buyers; whatever, Hugo; whatever, patriarchy. Just whatever.
By Mary, at July 13, 2006 5:41 AM

Jesus. What a bitch.

Excellent post! And damn, I'm right there with you on the defending these creeps thing. Quite frankly I don't give a fuck if these guys had hard lives. I don't give a crap if they're poor, sad souls beneath a hard crusty shell. I, and many, many women, have experienced the sting of abuse from men. As a whole women take ALL of the bullshit from men and you know what? It's never an excuse for us to act out. Nobody ever says, "Well, she was molested as a child" when a woman sexually abuses a child. Yet, when men are the issue the rallying cry which is inevitably prefaced with the obligatory, "I'm not excusing his behavior" is often, "Well, he WAS abused as a child". This society is way too keen on letting men have reasons and excuses and it's utter bullshit. *sigh* Now I have to run back to the Den and do a little post about excuses hehe.
By Biting Beaver, at July 13, 2006 7:20 AM

BB is the chick who is famous for saying she wished she aborted her own son. As to what she said about women never having/making excuses, she is insanely wrong. I'm not going over this issue again, she is just a dumbass.

seriously! there is no excuse for these men to behave and think the way they do. like mary said, they're repulsive - that's why they're alone.i guess why hugo's post bothered me to the extent that it did is that i read the same article he read and i saw absolutely no trace of humanity or decency in any of the men. i came away angry and disgusted and outraged at the men who think women are for sale. that they can check our "use by" date like we're a carton of milk.

You are you dumb bitch! I'm against relationships with women but some guys who do want women are naturally going to want the highest quality available. As long as there are women who are willing to sell themselves (and there always will be) there will be men to buy them. Unfortunately for these Ukranian women, today we are living in a bit of a "buyer's market", heh-heh-heh.

Stupid cunt in action

2007-09-24T12:25:00.000-07:00

The link: http://ginmar.livejournal.com/781488.html?thread=24356528

Here is an article about Darren Mack (a guy who stabbed his ex wife to death in retaliation for her screwing him in family court and then tried to off the judge who facilitated said screwing) by a loud mouthed cunt. This cunt goes by the name of ginmar and links to cunt queen Trish Wilson. She isn't quite as dumb as Wilson but that is kinda damning with faint praise, isn't it? Here are selections of her drivel with my sufficiently testerone fueled replies in bold. Sorry that this is all so out of date but I was not an MRA when the Mack incident happened so I am playing catch up. I don't even remember hearing about Mack on the news... probably because I don't watch it.

Crappy Article:

To wit:One scumbag, Darren Mack, kills his wife in the midst of a divorce. He's a millionaire, by the way, and owns a pawn shop, so he has access to weapons, vehicles, and capital. He used one of those weapons to subsequently shoot the judge in the case as well as a female staffer in the case. Now, if it were not for the shooting of the judge, the case would not have gone national. The murder of one woman and the shooting of another is just not news.

I take it Ms. Ginmar views this as an example of patriarchal bias in the media, you know, since every time a man is murdered it is front page news for monthes on end.

Pandagon has a good round up, too. Then CNN got in on the act, putting on a ranting MRA who said, basically, that poor Darren got driven mad by the injustice system that men labor under when they can't control and beat their wives any longer.

Typical feminine baloney. They get mad when THEIR money gets transferred to their ex's. Women either deliberately pretend that it is all about "control" or are really just too stupid to understand that it is about money.

CNN didn't check the murder cheerleader out; he's part of the same group that Mack was, and he's got quite the history, which Trish and Red State Feminist have both been on top of. Why didn't CNN check this guy out and find out he was a loon? ...Tell me about that liberal media again, I dare you.

Got to give the chick this one, I have not seen any liberal bias in the media for a long, long time.

This guy was allowed to say that Mack was driven to murder and attempted murder, as well as criticize one of the victims. It's a wife beater's fantasy; the ability to go on the air and just say, "Well, look what she made me do." These guys never take responsibility for the consequences of their actions, which have an alarming tendency to take the lives of women and children.

Whereas women like Andrea Yates, the Winkler ho, and that bitch who ran over her husband in her car a few years back are models of taking responsibility. Feminist showed how much they cared about children when they uniformilly demanded Yates receive the death penalty.

The only reasons these guys occasionally let women live is either carelessness or malice: after killing the kids, they know the woman will have to live with that for the rest of her life.

Scratch my earlier comment about this gal being smarter than Wilson, Wilson would never say something this stupid. I'm not even sure what this ho is getting at.

Darren Mack is currenlty on the run, and the basic refrain from the FRAs is that if these poor guys weren't denied justice, they wouldn't have to shoot their wives, or other people. They were driven to it, they claim. They had no choice.

Exactly, you don't blame the victim. We can't have people running around shooting up ho's or judges because that would be anarchy, but the real blame needs to be placed on the Matriarchy which created such unjust conditions for Mack in the first place.

Wouldn't you just love these guys raising boys and teaching them this stuff, as well as teaching girls how loathsome and disgusting they are?

Agreed, when couples split the men should take the boys and the women take the girls.

One thing that really pisses me off about discussing wife-beating is how people still perpetuate the notion that battered women are stupid to get involved with these guys.

You're right, these women are certifiable geniuses for getting involved with guys who use them for sparring practice and then staying with them. Men just can't understand feminine genius.

In fact, these guys study women, and more often than not they tend to go for women who have more traditional values or lower self esteem. They're often charming and seem to have come straight out of a romantic novel.

Hah! Sounds like ginmar here is talking from some personal experience!

This is why a good wife-beating statute will include some prohibition against threats or language.

We can't make this stuff up folks. So when men are violent or even verbally violent against a woman, who is supposedly their equal, there needs to be special laws to deal with that. Just another case of a woman admitting she is inferior to men and needs Big Sister to protect her.

When someone has previously been violent, being loud and threatening is intimidating or may even predictive behavior. Once the guy gets the woman hooked on him, he then subtly reverses direction and begins to tear her down in small steps, offering her 'advice' which is often insulting and demeaning in ways she can't quite identify. Because he has previously been so nice and complimentary, she thinks it's her. After all, people don't change, right? They do, however, conceal. He will be supportive and critical by turns, but he often seems to take her side against other people, cutting her away from them by either playing on or creating tensions. Once she's isolated from her support network, and has travelled a fairly far way down the pathway of destroyed confidence, he'll move to physically isolate her as well. He will pose this as for her own good or as something she's always wanted. Once he has her where he wants her, often times with children, he will become physically and emotionally abusive.

Sounds like someone has been reading too much Stephen King. This could have been a synopsis of the relationship between the upitty cunt in Rose Madder had with her husband Norman and what Beverly from It had with her husband Tom. (There is an upshot though in It when Tom beats the living shit out of Beverly's feminist best friend)

In the case of my mugging, a supposed 'lover's quarrel' involved a six foot four inch man beating a five foot three inch woman's face into the pavement till she was bloody and unconscious, seizing her purse and then running off.

I don't get it, why weren't you able to defend yourself from your equal?

Certain individuals like to claim that men never hit a woman, that men are told this. This is what they want to believe, much like the belief that bad things only happen to bad people.

Only a woman would believe something so stupid.

the court system is stacked against women with presumptions that wife beating and child abuse are signs of her failure as a mother, not his lack of character.

Like in Darren Mack's case where his ho got custody and 10 G's a month plus child support? This chick writing is an idiot.

becaus the standards of parenting are so incredibly higher for women than they are for men.

Which is why women almost always get custody, right? I think our friend ginny was on something when she wrote this article.

To add to the problem, divorcing couples then go before a divorce court system dominated by conservative white guys who often disapprove of women with jobs---and women without jobs.

In Red States things might be more balanced, but in Blue States as well as all of Britain, Canada and Austrailia the courts are totally stacked in womens favor, something that everyone knows. I'm not sure if this cunt is being deliberately dishonest or really is as ignorant as she is coming off.

In fact, the children are especially in danger from guys like this because they're simply vehicles of control and if that doesn't work---of revenge.

Pretty sure that it has been established that Feminists don't care about kids. Hey, nothing wrong with that, I don't care about kids either, but if such dishonesty about their motivation is never going to help any of these poor women land a husband.

Note I don't mention children there because it goes without saying: if women are easy to kill for these guys, children are effortless.

Just ask Andrea Yates.

Unless a woman has her own wealth or some solid foundation which enables her to be free of men, she can be vulnerable to any man.

Hate to break it to you bitch but even if she has her own wealth she is still dependent on the Matriarchy's force of mangina slave soldiers to keep her precious cunt safe.

For sexist men, their sole identity is being not women, and being better than women.

I wouldn't say that's my sole identity but it is a fair point. I would definately rather not exist than exist as a woman. Almost every guy feels the same way.

You have to attack another man [to make the news].

You have to either kill somebody who matters or kill a whole bunch of people, prefferably in a public place. It has nothing to do with sex. If Mack's judge had been a woman it would probably be even bigger news. You really are an idiot.

Feminist Criticism of MRA's: MRA's are Whiny

2007-09-19T11:22:00.000-07:00

Feminist often accuse MRA's of doing nothing but bitching and moaning. Feminist (probably due to their lack of a Y chromosome) are unable to see the truth, which is as follows:

1. Internet message boards are a place specifically designed for people to bitch and moan on. The teeth gnashing of MRA's on the internet is no more all there is to the movement than the feminist griping which is on Cunt liberation pages is all there is to the womyn's movement
2. Men, unlike women, actually have legitimate issues to complain about. We are facing government sanctioned discrimination, women on the other hand complain about the effects of their own inferiority. I am yet to see one example of government discrimination against women in the West. On the contrary, women are so inferior to men that they are always calling on the government to help improve their status, and that is the root of the problem we are facing today.
3. Men who do actually take means to resist the Matriarchy are always shrilly condemned by cunts as either being dangerous or loony. If you act you are a dangerous lunatic and if you complain you are just being a crybaby. The funny thing is that it isn't that women ignore the hypocrisy of such a stance, they are merely too stupid to see it.

Steven King is a Feminist Dick Monger

2007-09-17T05:41:00.001-07:00

Steven King loooooooves women. He thinks they are just sooooo great. Fuck that, women blow. Steven King should stop loving women so much. Steven King, if you are reading this: The AWC demands that you stop portraying women in such a positive light. If you do not comply with this demand we will have no choice but to make a totally hollow threat to boycott your future works.

I know what you are thinking, "You mean the guy who writes horror novels, don't bad things usually happen to women in horror novels?"

The short answer is "yes" and King has actually taken considerable heat from stupid feminist cunts for being a man, er... being insuffiently woman friendly; but most of said feminist cunts have not actually bothered to read his stuff. If they did they would find out that while some bad things do happen to King's female characters (not as much as happens to his male characters though), his main cuntachters always prove to be strong womyn who buck the odds and trounce their patriarchal opressors. While King personally denies being a feminist (::cough:: bullshit ::cough::), that he is one becomes an inavoidable conclusion once you notice that about 90 percent of his 10million or so books contain at least implicit pro-woman propaganda. Also interesting is that his books without feminist propaganda tend not to be very good. Conspiracy? I'll let you decide.

To be fair, King's ultimate feminst work Rose Madder is not very good either. I mean, it's okay but unlike most of his other stuff, it just isn't that good. Rose Madder is about an abused wife who becomes an uppity cunt (or, to translate for my female readers: an "empowered sheperson"). By the end of the novel you need to keep checking the cover page to make sure you haven't accidently picked up a work by an obscure feminist author named Stephanie King. All kidding aside, it becomes very difficult to believe that a man, even an extreme mangina, could produce such a cuntrology. The sad fact, however, is that while the Rose Madder is nothing special, it is still a million times too creative and the story is too well told to have been done by a woman. The conclusion: Your eyesight was not failing you and you are not reading the breakthrough work of bulldyke Stephanie King; Steven King is merely the world's biggest mangina.

King's severe case of woman-loveitis apparently comes from being raised by his Empowered(tm) and independent mother (and likewise not being raised by his abusive deadbeat of a father). In fact, his mother is allegedly the basis for the character Doloris Claiborne, the main character of the bizarely titled Dolores Claiborne. Claiborne is not really a feminist, per se, but she is empowered enough to kill her douchebag husband and so does her friend/enemy/employer Ms. Cunthair. Although I didn't think the book was that great, I did kinda sympathize with Claiborne. Yeah, she was a bitch, and a little bit uppity, but she wasn't so bad. She really wasn't a feminist though and unlike with Rose Madder it is hard to see women getting all wet over Dolores Claiborne. The AWC has decided to leave Dolores Claiborne off of the list of banned books.

Gerald's Game on the other hand is more feminist crap. It is also not particularly good. But didn't I say that it was King's non-feminist books that tended to be weak? The answer is yes, I said that, but his explicitly feminist one's aren't very good either. His best books are the one's which are implicitly pro-woman (It, The Stand, Insomnia). Actually, now that I think about it, I was wrong because a great deal of King's best books are not pro-woman either (Needful Things, Misery, Pet Semetary). Okay, forget what I said about King's non-feminist books not being that good, I was wrong on that point.

Anyway, back to Gerald's Game. It is a book about an uppity cunt and I wouldn't be surprised if many women found it more empowering than Rose Madder. My feminist readers must leave a comment or send me an email indicating which one they felt was more cunt-friendly.

In conclusion: Steven King is great! I fucking love Stephen King! The man is a genius and certainly one of the greatest writers of all time.

That said, the AWC cannot overlook the gratiutous woman-loving that permeates much of his writing. So listen good Stevie boy, your future books should focus more on women's flaws, I know that as a writer you delibrately avoid such easy assignments but we at the AWC have had it with your pro-woman propaganda. Women are lame, it is time for your writing to start reflecting that.

Anti-Feminist Myth: Feminism Has Destroyed the Family

2007-09-17T05:12:00.000-07:00

Feminism has not destroyed the family. I'm tired of hearing that it has.

By making DV laws, biased divorce courts and basically encouraging women to be total cunts, feminism has played a part in the weaking of the family in the West, but it is not the only or even the main reason for the decline of the family.

Let's examine the history and function of the family. Families in the past were necessary for survival. The family members supported eachother throughout their lives. People knew that when they got to old to work that they would need their children to fall back on. Families were needed in the pre-modern world.

As the world developed economically and technologically, that has changed. Many people would blame welfare and social security for the families demise, and while that is much closer to the truth than just yelling "Feminism!", it still misses the mark. If welfare/child support were eliminated it would not recreate the dependence women had on men and the dependence old people had family members in the past simply because the modern world has created so many options for women and the elderly. In a world where survival is based on hunting and fighting, women are basically useless except as human incubators and old people are entirely useless. But in a modernized society women are able to earn a living in many ways that don't require brawn (although obviously not as well as men can, because women are inferior to men mentally as well as physically, just not as dramatically). Similarly, if Social Security were eliminated people would not suddenly start popping out kids to care for them when they became old because modern economics have created a situation where people can essentially save up during their working years and live fairly comfortably until they head to that great old-folk's home in the sky.

Also commonly ignored is that the family is still an important part of our culture and it isn't going anywhere. The family is not as strong as it once was because of modernization but pretty much everybody has some form of family. When the Matriarchy collapses along with it's Nanny State apparatus, families will become healthier and happier (for the most part, to be fair a lot of families that should split up will no longer be able to because they will lack the support from "Big Sister") but people should not expect a return to an idealic 1950's scenerio that never existed in the real world anyway. Feminism sucks, women suck, but let's not blame them for everything.

Welcome

2007-09-13T00:16:00.000-07:00

Hello and Welcome to the Anti-Womens Coalition (AWC). As of now the AWC has only one member (me) but I think this blog can be a good way to get my message out and recruit new members and eventually become the premier Masculinist organization in the world. Such a lofty goal is surely a long way off but you have to start somewhere. (Insert cliched Chinese proverb here).

Let's begin with the AWC FAQ!

Q: What is the AWC's mission?
A: Well, there isn't just one, but I suppose the main mission is the same as that of all Men's Rights groups: the destruction of the Matriarchy and the liberation of men from female domination. I wanted to create this blog, however, because of several things I don't like about the Men's Movement itself. I want to steer the movement in a more radical and focussed direction.

Q: Hmm... I'm mildly interested now, what are your problems with the Men's Movement and what direction would you like to take it?
A: Basically, the Men's Movement is neither radical nor focussed enough. What do I mean? Well, the lack of radicalism I'm concerned with is primarilly the "soft" line taken visa vi women. In the Men's movement you will almost find statements like "we don't hate women, we hate feminism". I'm here to say, "fuck that". You cannot win a war in which you cannot even identify your enemy. Feminism is not the enemy, women are the enemy because ALL women are feminist. When you realise that women as a group need to be opposed, your strategy and tactics automatically shift and that leads to the "more focussed direction" I was talking about. The movement should have two goals: 1. To make laws that are favorable to men even if they hurt women and children 2. To encourage men to become independent from women. I am not ashamed to admit that I admire Feminism a great deal and see it as a model for Masculinism.

Q: Woah... all women are feminist? Are you sure?
A: All women: 1. Support alimony 2. Support Child Support 3. Support Family Courts unfair practices towards men 4. Support Domestic Violence laws which allow men to be thrown from their homes on the mere say so of a woman 5. Support women being able to make bullshit sexual harrassment suits 6. Support rape shield laws. 7. Support government money going to research for women's diseases 8. oppose laws creating draconian punishments for false rape accusations and paternity fraud (both should be mandatory life in prison).

Q: We can be sure you oppose those things?
A: Yes but so do all MRA's... atleast to a point. I oppose them absolutely. One issue I have with MRA's is over child custody. MRA's all agree men get shafted in family court but many of them don't advocate physical-joint custody because the inconvenience of such a life would not be in the best interest of the child. I say: fuck the goddamned child. We must take a page from the Feminist book here, just as Feminist worry exclusively about what is in women's best interest and ignore the rights of men and children; we need to exclusively worry about what is in men's best interest. Women's problems are not our problems.

Q: Well I'm a woman and I totally agree with everything you say, can I join up?
A: Sure, if you like. I'm not sure why you would want to join an organization that is opposed to your very sex, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Q: Is there any aspects of feminism you agree with?
A: Personally, yes. I support women's right to vote, own property, hold office, serve on juries, practice whatever proffession they wish, choose who and if they marry, get divorced, go to college, serve in the military, use contraception and terminate pregnancies. However I have no problem with men who oppose all of those things. I hate women and I don't care if they suffer, but I do believe they have rights, I just don't care if those rights get violated.

Q: You probably just can't get laid!
A: I'm sure I could (who couldn't?), but why would I want to? I hate women, I don't want anything to do with them.

That said, this criticism isn't that unfounded relating to many, maybe most, MRA's. Go to any MRA message board and you will find endless griping about how women go out with "bad boys" and eschew "nice guys" (presumably them). First of all, I do not know a single female that actively seeks out "bad boys", second of all even the most moderate feminist would (correctly) condemn such behavior as perpetuating Patriarchy. When Feminist criticize MRA's in this area it is one of many in which they are painfully correct about our movement. We have got a lot of house cleaning to do.

Q: Oh, so you are gay!
A: No, I'm not. But are you implying there is something wrong with being gay?

Q: You are just angry that you are losing some of your male priviledge! To bad bub, cause Feminism isn't going anywhere!
A: I have already made it clear I have no interest in having power over women so I don't really know what kind of priviledge you are talking about. And I really don't care whether the ideology of Feminism lives or dies, I just care that the Matriarchy that it has created dies. If you are implying that the Matriarchy is not going to be destroyed at the hands of men you are wrong. I have no interest in debating this. Our victory is inevitable.

Unfortunately, a lot of men in the movement do oppose Feminism becaause of what it has done to their status as heads of the family. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with men as the head of the house to some extent (generally speaking that is, there are certainly many exceptions) but a desire to turn back the clock is not a healthy basis for masculinism which should be about achieving male independence, not male dominance. Men who wish to turn back the clock do not anger me, and I embrace them in brothers in the stuggle against the matriarchy, but I do think that their ideology is archaic and is a bullseye for Feminists.

Q: You are hiding behind a computer you coward! If you said something like this to my face I'd kick your chauvinist ass!
A: No you wouldn't. You might try, but that would just result in me painting the sidewalk with your brains. You are used to men backing down to you because they fear the Feminist controlled courts, but I am one man who is willing to martyr himself if need be. Take your bully tactics elsewhere.

Q: If men are so great, how come they don't just roll back feminism?
A: Because the Matriarchy commands a force of 10's of millions of mangina slave-soldiers to deal with dissenters. Since this force is made up of men, it can not be defeated head on. (Were the Matriarchy to attempt to deploy females as its soldiers it would collapse overnight). Once men stop cooperating with the Matriarchy, your goose is cooked.

Q: Oh yeah, sure, I am just soooooo scared.
A: Yeah, I know you are. Women are horrible at hiding their emotions.

Q: Okay, we get your ideology, how do you plan to bring it about in the real world?
A: Great question! It must be done in phases:
1. Educate: Educate young men about the depth of the Matriarchal oppression they are facing. Spread hatred of women amongst men. Discourage men from enslaving themselves in relationships. Teaching men to be responsible and not knock girls up, thereby condemning themselves to (atleast) 18 years of child support. Teaching men that marriage (and even cohabitation) is a tool of Matriarchal oppression and that they must avoid it. We are doing this as we speak through word of mouth and mainly via the internet. So far we have had great success in raising conciousness of men's rights and hatred of women to all time highs amongst men in the West.
2. Withdrawl: Do not get married! Men must stop walking like lambs to the slaughter! Not marrying and not having children by themselves will weaken the Matriarchy more than any other action we can take. Marrying foreign women is not an acceptable alternative for marriage is slavery for men in the West no matter who they are married to. Foreign women will simply become feminist after awhile of living here. Also, any form of marriage promotes the Matriarchal myth that men need women. As of now one quarter of young men refuse to marry, the so called "marriage strike". We need to get that number up to at least 80 percent. (The remaining 20 percent would obviously consist of woman lovers who we can't help and don't want our help)
3. Infiltrate: Just like NOW controls the Democratic party, we in the men's movement must gain control of the Republican party. The AWC's very name makes it unable to fulfill such a role and a future umbrella group simply called the National Organization for Men could be very effective. We are in the opening stages of this phase of the campaign and have had some small successes, but nothing major.